Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 177–186 | Cite as

Collaborative healthcare research: Some ethical considerations

Article

Abstract

This article reviews some of the ethical aspects of collaborative research. Scientific collaboration has known potential benefits but it’s a challenging task to successfully accomplish a collaborative venture on ethically sound grounds. Current trends in international healthcare research collaboration reflect limited benefits for the majority of world population. Research collaboration between scientists of academia and industry usually has financial considerations. Successful cross-cultural and international collaborations have to overcome many regional and global barriers. Despite these difficulties, many scientific collaborations usually begin with an informal meeting or contact. With advancement in global communications, scientists have greater responsibility towards the world community while considering the impact of their collaborative partnerships. I review the basic factors that are required for forging a collaborative partnership and responsible attitudes to sustain the relationship. Finally I conclude that scientists in healthcare research can play important roles beyond collaborations and contribute to bringing harmony, resolving differences across the nations and countries in today’s troubled world.

Keywords

Collaborative Research Ethics Developing Countries Global Healthcare 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graham, O.C., Harnett, N.E., Harrison, E. & Considine, E. (1994) Collaborative research. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 26: 121–123.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Labonte, R. & Spiegel, J. (2003) Setting global health research priorities. British Medical Journal 326: 722–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jesus, J.E. & Higgs, E.S. (2002) International research ethics: progress, but not perfection. Trends in Molecular Medicine 8: 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swaminathan, M.S. (2000) Science in response to basic human needs. Science 287: 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benatar, S.R. (2001) Commentary: justice and medical research: a global perspective. Bioethics 15: 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The 10/90 report on health research 2000. Global Forum for Health Research, Geneva GHFR 2000. Online at: http://www.globalforumhealth.org/pages/index.asp (last accessed: 09-10-2004.)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drenth, P.J.D. (2001) Scientific academies in international conflict resolution. Technology in Society 23: 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benatar, S.R. (2002) Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine 54: 1131–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DuPont, H.L. (1991) Importance of collaborative research to improve world health. Journal of Infectious Diseases 163: 946–950.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anonymous. (1995) Geneva forum of UNESCO on science and society- Geneva declaration on science and society, in: Kouzminov V, Biggin S, and Santesso R, eds. First reflection meeting: International Symposium on Science and Power (Genoa, Italy). UNESCO, Paris. p. 183.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuenod, M. (1999) On the frontiers of science. Science 283: 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tripsas, M., Schrader, S. & Sobrero, M. (1995) Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R & D: A new role for government. Research Policy 24: 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gardner, J.K., Rall, L.C. & Peterson, C.A. (2002) Lack of multidisciplinary collaboration is a barrier to outcomes research. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 102: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OVretveit, J., Bate, P., Cleary, P., Cretin, S., Gustafson, D., McInnes, K., McLeod, H., Molfenter, T., Plsek, P., Robert, G., Shortell, S. & Wilson, T. (2002) Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Quality & Safety in Health care 11: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melin, G. (2000) Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wells, K.B. (2002) Science discovery in clinician-economist collaboration: legacy and future challenges. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 5: 89–94.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verkooyen, R.P., Noordhoek, G.T., Klapper, P.E., Reid, J., Schirm, J., Cleator, G.M., Ieven, M. & Hoddevik, G. (2003) Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41: 3013–3016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammond, E.L., Sayer, D., Nolan, D., Walker, U.A., Ronde, A., Montaner, J.S., Cote, H.C., Gahan, M.E., Cherry, C.L., Wesselingh, S.L., Reiss, P., & Mallal, S. (2003) Assessment of precision and concordance of quantitative mitochondrial DNA assays: a collaborative international quality assurance study. Journal of Clinical Virology 27: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saldanha, J., Gerlich, W., Lelie, N., Dawson, P., Heermann, K., & Heath, A. (2001) An international collaborative study to establish a World Health Organization international standard for hepatitis B virus DNA nucleic acid amplification techniques. Vox sanguinis 80: 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stokes, W.S., Schechtman, L.M. & Hill, R.N. (2002) The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): a review of the ICCVAM test method evaluation process and current international collaborations with the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 30 (Suppl 2): 23–32.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gu, D., Reynolds, K., Duan, X., Xin, X., Chen, J., Wu, X., Mo, J., Whelton, P.K. & He, J. (2003) Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the Chinese adult population: International collaborative study of cardiovascular disease in Asia (InterASIA). Diabetologia 46: 1190–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lubeck, P.S., Cook, N., Wagner, M., Fach, P. & Hoorfar, J. (2003) Toward an international standard for PCR-based detection of food-borne thermotolerant Campylobacters: validation in a multicenter collaborative trial. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 5670–5672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mire-Sluis, A., Gaines Das, R. & Lernmark, A. (2003) Standardization of antibody preparations for use in immunogenicity studies: a case study using the World Health Organization International Collaborative Study for Islet Cell Antibodies. Developmental Biology (Basel) 112: 153–63, 153–163.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burgers, J.S., Cluzeau, F.A., Hanna, S.E., Hunt, C. & Grol, R. (2003) Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health care 19: 148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kennedy, G.E., Peersman, G. & Rutherford, G.W. (2002) International collaboration in conducting systematic reviews: the Cochrane Collaborative Review Group on HIV Infection and AIDS. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 30 (Suppl 1): S56-S61.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robinson, D.F., Savage, G.T. & Campbell, K.S. (2003) Organizational learning, diffusion of innovation, and international collaboration in telemedicine. Health Care Management Review 28: 68–78.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Landry, R. & Amara, N. (1998) The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy 27: 901–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnes, T, Pashby I. & Gibbons, A. (2002) Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal 20: 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shane, S. (2002) Executive forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17: 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maina-Ahlberg, B., Nordberg, E. & Tomson, G. (1997) North-South health research collaboration: challenges in institutional interaction. Social Science & Medicine 44: 1229–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davenport, S., Davies J., & Grimes, C. (1998) Collaborative research programmes: Building trust from difference. Technovation 19: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosser, W.W., Culpepper, L., Lam, C.L., Parkerson, G., Poon, V. & Weel, C.V. (1997) Guidelines for international collaborative research. Family Practice 14: 330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Archibugi, D. & Coco, A. (2003) International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation 24: 517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neufeld, V., MacLeod, S., Tugwell, P., Zakus, D. & Zarowsky, C. (2001) The rich-poor gap in global health research: challenges for Canada. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association 164: 1158–1159.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pfeiffer, J. (2003) International NGOs and primary health care in Mozambique: the need for a new model of collaboration. Social Science & Medicine 56: 725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anonymous. (2000) Priority setting for health research: lessons from developing countries. The working group on priority setting. Health Policy and Planning 15: 130–136.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robison, V.A. (1998) Some ethical issues in international collaborative research in developing countries. International Dental Journal 48: 552–556.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tangwa, G.B. (2001) Moral agency, moral worth and the question of double standards in medical research in developing countries. Developing World Bioethics 1: 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ziman, J.M. (1998) Why must scientists become more ethically sensitive than they used to be? Science 282: 1813–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ziman, J. (2001) Getting scientists to think about what they are doing. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brenner, S. (1998) The impact of society on science. Science 282: 1411–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Calman, K. (2002) Conducting research ethically in developing countries. Drug Discovery Today 7: 1155–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Alpers, M.P. (2003) The buttressing coalition of the PNGIMR: an example of international collaborative research. Trends in Parasitology 19: 278–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fisher, I.S. & Gill, O.N. (2001) International surveillance networks and principles of collaboration. Euro Surveillance 6: 17–21.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lacroix, A., Lareng, L., Padeken, D., Nerlich, M., Bracale, M., Ogushi, Y., Okada, Y., Orlov, O.I., McGee, J., Sanders, J.H., Doarn, C.R., Prerost, S. & McDonald, I. (2002) International concerted action on collaboration in telemedicine: recommendations of the G-8 Global Healthcare Applications Subproject-4. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 8: 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fetzer, J. (2003) Collaborative research. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 376: 279–280.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ehlin, C. (1998) Fostering both sides of human nature-The foundation for collaborative relationships. Business Horizons 41: 15–25.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Landry, R., Traore, N. & Godin, B. (1996) A econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. Higher Education 32: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Child, J. (2001) Trust—the fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics 29: 274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    LeGris, J., Weir, R., Browne, G., Gafni, A., Stewart, L. & Easton, S. (2000) Developing a model of collaborative research: the complexities and challenges of implementation. International Journal of Nursing Studies 37: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bronstein, L.R. (2003) A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work 48: 297–306.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bossert, E.A., Evans, S., Cleve, L.V. & Savedra, M.C. (2002) Multisite research: A systems approach. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 17: 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sarkar, M.B., Aulakh, P.S. & Cavusgil, S.T. (1998) The strategic role of relational bonding in interorganizational collaborations: An empirical study of the global construction industry. Journal of International Management 4: 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee, Y.S. (1996) ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25: 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lee, C.C. (1997) The global future of professional counseling: Collaboration for international Social change. International Journal of International Relations 21: 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Endocrinology and Metabolism Research CenterTehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th Floor, Dr. Shariati HospitalTehranIran

Personalised recommendations