Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 535–551 | Cite as

Emotional engagement in professional ethics

Article

Abstract

Recent results from two different studies show evidence of strong emotional engagement in moral dilemmas that require personal involvement or ethical problems that involve significant inter-personal issues. This empirical evidence for a connection between emotional engagement and moral or ethical choices is interesting because it is related to a fundamental survival mechanism rooted in human evolution. The results lead one to question when and how emotional engagement might occur in a professional ethical situation. However, the studies employed static dilemmas or problems that offered only two choices whose outcome was certain or nearly so, whereas actual problems in professional ethics are dynamic and typically involve considerable uncertainty. The circumstances of three example cases suggest that increasing personal involvement and uncertainty could have been perceived as changes, threats, or opportunities and could therefore have elicited an emotional response as a way to ensure the reputation, integrity or success of oneself or a group to which one belongs. Such emotional engagement is only suggested and more studies and experiments are required to better characterize the role of emotional engagement in professional ethics.

Keywords

moral dilemmas professional ethics neuroimaging emotions emotional engagement decision-making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M. & Cohen, J.D. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connelly, S., Helton-Fauth, W. & Mumford, M.D. (2004) A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics 51: 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etzioni, A. (1988) Normative-affective factors: Toward a new decision-making model. Journal of Economic Psychology 9: 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frank, R.H. (1988) Passions within Reason. The Strategic Role of the Emotions. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibbard, A. (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaudine, A. & Thorne, L. (2001) Emotions and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 31:175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohan, J.A. (2002) “I Didn’t Know” and “I Was Only Doing My Job”: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics 40: 275–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein, S. (2002) The head, the heart, and business virtues. Journal of Business Ethics 39: 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haidt, J. (2003) Moral Emotions, in: Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. eds. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford University Press: 852–870.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foot, P. (1967) Abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review 5: 5–15.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomson, J.J. (1985) The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal 94 (6): 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naylor, M.B. (1988) The moral of the trolley problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (4): 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malm, H.M. (1989) Killing, letting die, and simple conflicts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (3): 238–258.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rachels, J. (2003) The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davidson, R. J. & Irwin, W. (1999) The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greene, J.D., Nystrom, L.E., Engell, A.D., Darley, J.M. & Cohen, J.D. (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Awh, E. & Gehring, W.J. (1999) The anterior cingulated cortex lends a hand in response selection. Nature Neuroscience 2: 853–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Connelly, M. S., Helton, W. B., Schultz, R., Van Doorn, J. R., Benavidez, J., Thompson, H. & Mumford, M. (2000) Assessment Tool Report: Review of Existing Tools and Development of New Tools (Vols. 1 and 2). Technical Report for the Department of Defense (contract No. 1999*I033800*000). Norman, OK, University of Oklahoma, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mumford, M.D., Gessner, T.L., Connelly, M.S., O’Connor, J.A. & Clifton, T. (1993) Leadership and destructive acts: Individual and situational influences. Leadership Quarterly 4: 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cornelius, A. R. (1996) The Science of Emotion. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, C. A. & Lazarus, R. S. (1993) Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion 7: 233–269.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Darwin, C. (1872) The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals. Philosophical Library, New York.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz, L. D. (2002) Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zajonc, R.B. (1980) Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35: 151–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moore, D.A. & Loewenstein, G. (2004) Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17: 189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    NSPE (2003) Code of Ethics for Engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers. Available at http://www.nspe.org/ethics/eh1-code.asp.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bell, T.E. & Esch, K. (1987) The fatal flaw in Flight 51-L. IEEE Spectrum, 24 (2): 36–51.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robison, W., Boisjoly, R., Hoeker, D. & Young, S. (2002) Representation and misrepresentation: Tufte and the Morton Thiokol engineers on the Challenger. Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rogers Commission (1986) Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. Available at http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/genindex.htm.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    See description of case by Roger Boisjoly at http://onlineethics.org/moral/boisjoly/RB1-6.html.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schwartz, H.S. (1987) On the psychodynamics of organizational disaster: The case of the space shuttle Challenger. Columbia Journal of World Business XXII (1), Spring: 59–67.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Feynman, R.P. (1988) An outsider’s inside view of the Challenger inquiry. Physics Today 41, (2): 26–37.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Starbuck, W.H. & Milliken, F.J. (1989) Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. Journal of Management Studies 25: 319–340.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boisjoly, R.P., Curtis, E.F. & Mellican, E. (1989) Roger Boisjoly and the Challenger disaster: the ethical dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 8: 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Werhane, P. (1991) Engineers and management: The challenge of the challenger incident, Journal of Business Ethics 10: 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tufte, E.R. (1997) Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics Press. (Available at www.edwardtufte.com).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davis, M. (1998) Thinking Like an Engineer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gintis, H. (2000) Game Theory Evolving. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J.K., Aronson, J.A., Nystrom, L.E. & Cohen, J.D. (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300: 1755–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rilling, J.K., Gutman, D.A., Zeh, T.R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G.S. & Kilts, C.D. (2002) A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Singer, T., Kiebel, S.J., Winston, J.S., Dolan, R.J. & Frith, C.D. (2004) Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron 41: 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Montague, P.R., Berns, G.S., Cohen, J.D., McClure, S.M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., Wiest, M. C., Karpov, I., King, R. D., Apple, N. & Fisher, R. E. (2002) Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage 16: 1159–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Adolphs, R. (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4(2): 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Integrated Engineering ProgramUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations