Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 389–400 | Cite as

Effectiveness of an ethics course delivered in traditional and non-traditional formats

  • Charles R. Feldhaus
  • Patricia L. Fox
Article

Abstract

This paper details a three-credit-hour undergraduate ethics course that was delivered using traditional, distance, and compressed formats. OLS 263: Ethical Decisions in Leadership is a 200-level course offered by the Department of Organizational Leadership and Supervision in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Students in engineering, technology, business, nursing, and other majors take the course. In an effort to determine student perceptions of course and instructor effectiveness, end-of-course student survey data were compared using data from traditional, distance, and compressed sections of the course. In addition, learning outcomes from the final course project were evaluated using a standardized assessment rubric and scores on the course project.

Keywords

ethics traditional compressed distance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Young, J.R. (2000). Scholar Concludes That Distance Ed Is as Effective as Traditional Instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education: Distance Education. http://chronicle.com/free/2000/02/2000021001u.htm.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Russell, T. L. (1999). The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunication, North Carolina State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carey, J. M. (2001). Effective student outcomes: A comparison of online and face-to face delivery modes. DEOSNEWS, Vol. 11, no. 9, ISSN 1062-9416. http://www.ed.psu.edu/ascde/deos/deosnews/deosarchives.asp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniel, E.L. (2000). A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34, 298–308.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynolds, K. C. (1993). Students in cohort programs and intensive schedule classes: Does familiarity breed differences? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Pittsburg, PA. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction No. ED365175).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott, P.A., & Conrad, C.F. (1991). A critique of intensive courses and an agenda for research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 8, 411–459.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott, P.A. (1995). Learning experiences in intensive and semester-length classes: Student voices and experiences. College Student Journal, 30, 207–213.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nixon, R.O. (1996). A source document on accelerated courses and programs at accredited two and four year colleges and universities. Tucson, AZ: Pima Community College (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED399827).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mims, S. K. (1983). The impact of time on art learning: Intensive vs. concurrent scheduling in higher education. Studies in Art Education, 24, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knowles, L. (1972). The intensive semester: An experimental approach to academic achievement. California Journal of Educational Research, 23, 109–114.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woodruff, J.C., & Mollise, T. (1995). Course Performance of students in weekly and daily formats. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 43, 10–15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wlodkowski, R.J. & Westover, T.N. (1999). Accelerated courses as a learning format for adults. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 13, 1–20.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wlodkowski, R.J., Mauldin, J.E., & Gahn, S.W. (August, 2001). Learning in the Fast Lane: Adult Learners’ Persistence and Success in Accelerated College Programs. Lumina New Agenda Series, 4, 1–50. http://www.luminafoundation.org/Publications/New%20Agenda%20Series/Fastlane.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carlisle, R. (2001). A four year study comparing English classes online, via television, and face-to-face. California State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, M. (2001). Introductory biology online: Assessing outcomes of two student populations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 5, 312–317.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Musumeci, D. (2001). The Spanish Project: Innovations in Online Learning. Center for Academic Transformation. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gagne, M. & Shepherd, M. (2001). Distance learning in accounting: A comparison between a distance and traditional graduate accounting class. T.H.E. Journal, 28, 9, 58–65.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowling, N., Ries, K., & Ivanitskaya, L. (August, 2002). How effective are compressed courses? Central Michigan University’s OnTarget newsletter, vol I, issue III. http://www.cel.cmich.edu/ontarget/aug02/compressed.htm.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ayub, B.M., & McCuen, R.H. (2003). Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational Research: An Introduction. Longman Publishers, White Plains, NY.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lau, A.S. (June, 2001). Transformations: Ethics and design. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Feldhaus
    • 1
  • Patricia L. Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Organizational Leadership and Supervision, Purdue School of Engineering and TechnologyIndiana University Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations