Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 493–502 | Cite as

Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors

  • Matko Marušić
  • Jadranka Božikov
  • Vedran Katavić
  • Darko Hren
  • Marko Kljaković-Gašpić
  • Ana Marušić
Article

Abstract

The authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) are widely accepted in biomedical journals, but many studies in large and prestigious journals show that a considerable proportion of authors do not fulfill these criteria. We investigated authorship contributions in a small medical journal outside the scientific mainstream, to see if poor adherence to authorship criteria is common in biomedical journals. We analyzed statements on research contribution, as checked by the corresponding author, for individual authors of 114 research articles, representing 475 authors, submitted to the Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) from 1999 to 2000. Only 40% of authors fulfilled the ICMJE authorship criteria. The authors listed first on the by-line were more likely to fulfill the authorship criteria than all other authors on the by-line. The percentage of authors fulfilling the ICMJE criteria of authorship decreased with the increase in the number of authors listed on the by-line. These results indicate that poor adherence to ICMJE authorship criteria is poor across biomedical journals, regardless of the size of the scientific community. Authorship and contributorship in biomedical journals, as well as editorial ethical responsibilities towards authorship criteria need critical redefinition and education of both editors and authors.

Keywords

authorship ethics publications 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    [Anonymous] (1982) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 96: 766–771.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    [Anonymous] (1985) Editorial consensus on authorship and other matters. Lancet 2: 595.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    [Anonymous] (1988) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258–265.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    [Anonymous] (1993) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Journal of the American Medical Association 269: 2282–2286.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    [Anonymous] (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine 126: 36–47.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidoff, F., Godlee, F., Hoey, J., Glass, R., Overbeke, J., Utiger, R., Nicholls, M.G., Horton, R., Nylenna, M., Hojgaard, L. & Kotzin, S. (2003) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 103: 137–149.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burman, K.D. (1982) “Hanging from the masthead”: reflections on authorship. Annals of Internal Medicine 97: 602–605.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Onwude, J.L., Staines, A. & Lilford, R.J. (1993) Multiple author trend worst in medicine. British Medical Journal 306: 1345.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kassirer, J.P. & Angell, M. (1991) On authorship and acknowledgments. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1510–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan, K.S., Nwosu, C.R., Khan, S.F., Dwarakanath, L.S. & Chien, P.F. (1999) A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181: 503–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huth, E.J. (1986) Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Annals of Internal Medicine 104: 257–259.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flanagin, A., Carey, L.A., Fontanarosa, P.B., Phillips, S.G., Pace, B.P., Lundberg, G.D. & Rennie, D. (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, R. (1997) Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? British Medical Journal 314: 992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    [Anonymous] (1997) Games people play with authors’ names. Nature 387: 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B. & DeAngelis, C.D. (2002) Authorship for research groups. Journal of the American Medical Association 288: 3166–3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horton, R. (1996) Prizes, publications, and promotion. Lancet 348: 1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horton, R. & Smith, R. (1996) Signing up for authorship. Lancet 347: 780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rennie, D., Flanagin, A. & Yank, V. (2000) The contributions of authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rennie, D. (2001) Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001. Muscle & Nerve 24: 1274–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (1999) Authorship criteria and academic reward. Lancet 353: 1713–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lawrence, P.A. (2002) Rank injustice. Nature 415: 835–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bennett, D.M. & Taylor, D.M. (2003) Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine 15: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    [Anonymous] (2003) Who’d want to work in a team? Nature 424: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E. & Ordway, S. (1996) Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shapiro, D.W., Wenger, N.S. & Shapiro, M.F. (1994) The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 438–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoen, W.P., Walvoort, H.C. & Overbeke, A.J. (1998) What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors’ names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 217–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hwang, S.S., Song, H.H., Baik, J.H., Jung, S.L., Park, S.H., Choi, K.H. & Park, Y.H. (2003) Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology 226: 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ward, B. (1994) Undue credit for supervisors. Nature 368: 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yank, V. & Rennie, D. (1999) Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Annals of Internal Medicine 130: 661–670.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (1999) Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. Croatian Medical Journal 40: 508–514.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marusic, A., Misak, A., Kljakovic-Gaspic, M. & Marusic, M. (2002) Educatione ad excelentiam — ten years of the Croatian medical journal. Croatian Medical Journal 43: 1–7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moulopoulos, S.D., Sideris, D.A. & Georgilis, K.A. (1983) For debate ... Individual contributions to multiauthor papers. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 287: 1608–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rennie, D. & Flanagin, A. (1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association 271: 469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rennie, D., Yank, V. & Emanuel, L. (1997) When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Drenth, J.P. (1998) Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 219–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Riesenberg, D. & Lundberg, G.D. (1990) The order of authorship: who’s on first? Journal of the American Medical Association 264: 1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Horton, R. (1998) The unmasked carnival of science. Lancet 351: 688–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marusic, A. & Marusic, M. (2003) Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med 78: 1235–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matko Marušić
    • 1
  • Jadranka Božikov
    • 1
  • Vedran Katavić
    • 1
  • Darko Hren
    • 1
  • Marko Kljaković-Gašpić
    • 1
  • Ana Marušić
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyZagreb University School of MedicineZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations