Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 471–482 | Cite as

Mentoring: Some ethical considerations

Abstract

To counter confusion about the term ‘mentor’, and address concerns about the scarcity of mentoring, I argue for an “honorific” definition, according to which a mentor is virtuous like a saint or hero. Given the unbounded commitment of mentors, mentoring relationships must be voluntary. In contrast, the role of advisor can be specified, mandated, and monitored. I argue that departments and research groups have a moral responsibility to devise a system of roles and structures to meet graduate students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ needs for information and advice.

Keywords

mentor advisor role model voluntary ethical duty collective responsibility department research group laxity scarcity transmission ethical standards 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Swazey, J.P & Anderson, M.S. (1996) Mentors, advisors, and role models in graduate and professional education. Association of Academic Health Centers, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barondess, J.A. (1995) A brief history of mentoring (President’s Address). Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 106. 1–24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stern, J.E. & Elliott, D. (1997) The ethics of scientific research: A guidebook for course development, University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vance, C. (1982) The mentor connection, Journal of Nursing Administration: 12.4: 7–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fried, Charles. (1976) The lawyer as friend: The moral foundations of the lawyer/client relation. Yale Law Journal 85: 1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darling, L.A. (1986) What To Do About Toxic Mentors, Nurse Educator. 11(2): 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weil, V. & Arzbaecher, R. (1995) Ethics and relationships in laboratories and research communities. Professional Ethics 4 (3&4): 83–125.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson, M.S., Louis, K.S., and Earle, J. (1994) Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct, The Journal of Higher Education, 65 (3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Broome, Taft H. (1996) The heroic mentorship, Science Communication 17 (4): 398–429.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Djerassi, Carl. (1991) Mentoring: A cure for science bashing? Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN), November 25, 30–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swazey, J.P. (1993) Teaching research ethics: needs, opportunities, and barriers in graduate programs. Paper presented at meeting of NSF Consortium Project: The production of educational modules for the teaching of research ethics, Lake Bluff, Il.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buchanan, A. (1996) Perfecting imperfect duties: collective action to create moral obligations. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henderson, J. & Welch, O.M (1993) Mentoring in higher education and industry: Is there a paradox? Paper presented at American Education Research Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Ethics in the ProfessionsIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations