Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 25–34

From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark

  • Daniel Andersen

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x

Cite this article as:
Andersen, D. SCI ENG ETHICS (2000) 6: 25. doi:10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x


In 1992, The Danish Medical Research Council established a national committee on scientific dishonesty with the twofold task of handling cases of scientific misconduct and taking preventive initiatives. Scientific dishonesty was proven in only five cases, but in another nine cases lesser degrees of deviations from good scientific practice were found. The experiences from a total of 24 treated cases indicated that three key areas were at the basis of most of the accusations and the deviations from good practice: uncertainty about 1) authorship, about 2) rights and duties to use scientific data and about 3) agreements at the initiation of joint studies. As a consequence guidelines on good practice have been issued on these key subjects.


authorship good scientific practice guidelines rights to use scientific data scientific fraud storage of scientific data 

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.The Danish Committee on Scientific DishonestyDanish Research AgencyCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations