Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 529–539 | Cite as

Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology

Article

Abstract

Survey data are presented on opinions about agricultural biotechnology and its applications held by agricultural science faculty at highly ranked programs in the United States with and without personal involvement in biotechnology-oriented research. Respondents believed biotech holds much promise, but policy positions vary. These results underscore the relationship between opinion and stakeholder interests in this research, even among scientific experts. Media accounts are often seen as causes, rather than artifacts, of the existence of public controversy; European and now U.S. opposition to food biotechnology is often explained away in terms of such a relationship. The authors argue that where even experts are divided, public opposition cannot reasonably be attributed to poor public understanding or sensationalistic media accounts. Ethical implications for communicating science are explored.

Keywords

biotechnology science journalism agriculture expert opinion mass media 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J. & Allum, N. C., (1999) Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science 285: 384–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziman, J. (1992) Not Knowing, Needing to Know, and Wanting to Know, in: Lewenstein, B.V. (ed.) When Science Meets the Public, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gandy, O. (1982) Beyond agenda-setting: Information subsidies and public policy, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Priest, S. and Talbert, J. (1994) Mass Media and the Ultimate Technological Fix: Newspaper Coverage of Biotechnology, Southwestern Mass Communication Journal 10 (1): 76–85.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewenstein, B. V., Allaman, T. & Parthasarathy, S. (1998) Historical Survey of Media Coverage of Biotechnology in the United States, 1970 to 1996. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD (August).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Priest, S. (1999) Selling an Uncertain Future: Biotechnology and the Media, in: Dunwoody, S., Friedman, S. & Rogers, C. (eds.) Communicating Uncertainty, Erlbaum, New Jersey: 95–112.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, Rev. Ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caplan, A. L. (1998) What Are the Real Ethical Issues Raises by Cloning? AMWA Journal 13(3): 17–19.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boulter, D. (1995) Plant biotechnology: Facts and public perception, Phytochemistry 40(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of JournalismTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations