Advertisement

Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 852–864 | Cite as

Quality and Safety Considerations of Incorporating Post-PEF Ageing into the Pulsed Electric Fields and Sous Vide Processing Chain

  • A. U. Alahakoon
  • I. Oey
  • P. BremerEmail author
  • P. Silcock
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of pulsed electric fields (0.7 and 1.5 kV/cm, specific energy 90–100 kJ/kg) processing followed by post–pulsed electric field (PEF) ageing ( 0, 3, 7, 14 days) on the safety and quality attributes of sous vide–processed (60 °C/12 or 24 h) beef briskets was assessed. Ageing did not significantly reduce the hardness of sous vide–processed meat except for those PEF treated either at 0.7 kV/cm followed by sous vide processing for 12 h or at 1.5 kV/cm followed by sous vide processing for 24 h. Post-PEF ageing time had no effect on the collagen solubility of sous vide–processed meat. The effect of PEF treatment on hardness was much greater than the effect of ageing time, and sous vide processing time. Sous vide processing (12 or 24 h) for all treatments reduced both aerobic and lactic acid bacteria numbers to below the detection limit. Initial peptide concentrations during in vitro peptic digestibility were significantly (P < 0.05) different between some treatments; however no significant (P > 0.05) differences were observed in digestion rates between any treatment. Ageing of PEF-treated meat for a few days prior to sous vide processing may improve tenderness; however, these gains in quality may be offset by a greater total water loss and an increase in lipid oxidation.

Keywords

Ageing Sous vide processing Meat quality Digestibility Pulsed electric fields 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the University of Otago for awarding a PhD scholarship to Amali Alahakoon.

Funding Information

This research was carried out as part of the Food Industry Enabling Technologies programme funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment (contract MAUX1402).

References

  1. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods 259.278 Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (vol 18). Arlington, VA. USA.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, D. E. (2010). Sous Vide for the Home Cook. NY: USA: Paradox Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, D. E. (2012). Sous vide cooking: A review. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 1(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  4. Bekhit, A. E. D. A., van de Ven, R., Suwandy, V., Fahri, F., & Hopkins, D. (2014a). Effect of pulsed electric field treatment on cold-boned muscles of different potential tenderness. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(11), 3136–3146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekhit, A. E. D. A., Carne, A., Ha, M., & Franks, P. (2014b). Physical interventions to manipulate texture and tenderness of fresh meat: a review. International Journal of Food Properties, 17(2), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekhit, A. E. D. A., Suwandy, V., Carne, A., van de Ven, R. V., & Hopkins, D. L. (2016). Effect of repeated pulsed electric field treatment on the quality of hot-boned beef loins and topsides. Meat Science, 111, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertram, H. C., Karlsson, A. H., & Andersen, H. J. (2003). The significance of cooling rate on water dynamics in porcine muscle from heterozygote carriers and non-carriers of the halothane gene-a low-field NMR relaxation study. Meat Science, 65(4), 1281–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhat, Z. F., Morton, J. D., Mason, S. L., & Bekhit, A. E. D. A. (2018). Applied and emerging methods for meat tenderization: a comparative perspective. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 17(4), 841–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouton, P. E., & Harris, P. V. (1972). The effects of cooking temperature and time on some mechanical properties of meat. Journal of Food Science, 37(1), 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouton, P. E., & Harris, P. V. (1981). Changes in the tenderness of meat cooked at 50–65 °C. Journal of Food Science, 46(2), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Church, F. C., Swaisgood, H. E., Porter, D. H., & Catignani, G. L. (1983). Spectrophotometric assay using o-phthaldialdehyde for determination of proteolysis in milk and isolated milk proteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 66(6), 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross, H. R., Carpenter, Z. L., & Smith, G. C. (1973). Effects of intramuscular collagen and elastin on bovine muscle tenderness. Journal of Food Science, 38(6), 998–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faridnia, F., Bekhit, A. E. A., Niven, B., & Oey, I. (2014). Impact of pulsed electric fields and post-mortem vacuum aging on beef longissimus thoracis muscles. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(11), 2339–2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goll, D. E., Bray, R. W., & Hoekstra, W. G. (1963). Age-associated changes in muscle composition. The isolation and properties of a collagenous residue from bovine musclea. Journal of Food Science, 28(5), 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, F. (1966). The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. Journal of Food Science, 31(2), 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huff-Lonergan, E., & Lonergan, S. M. (2005). Mechanisms of waterholding capacity in meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Science, 71(1), 194–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang, I. H., Devine, C. E., & Hopkins, D. L. (2003). The biochemical and physical effects of electrical stimulation on beef and sheep meat tenderness. Meat Science, 65(2), 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilian, M. A., Morton, J. D., Kent, M. P., Le Couteur, C. E., Hickford, J., Cowley, R., & Bickerstaffe, R. (2001). Intermuscular variation in tenderness: association with the ubiquitous and muscle-specific calpains. Journal of Animal Science, 79(1), 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Irurueta, M., Cadoppi, A., Langman, L., Grigioni, G., & Carduza, F. (2008). Effect of aging on the characteristics of meat from water buffalo grown in the Delta del Paran ́a region of Argentina. Meat Science, 79(3), 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolar, K. (1990). Colorimetric determination of hydroxyproline as measure of collagen content in meat and meat-products-NMKL collaborative study. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 73(1), 54–57.Google Scholar
  21. Minekus, M., Alminger, M., Alvito, P., Ballance, S., Bohn, T., Bourlieu, C., . . . Brodkorb, A. (2014). A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food - an international consensus. Food & Function, 5(6), 1113-1124.Google Scholar
  22. Monahan, F. J. (2000). Oxidation of lipids in muscle foods: fundamental and applied concerns. NY, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Morrissey, P. A., Sheehy, P. J. A., Galvin, K., Kerry, J. P., & Buckley, D. J. (1998). Lipid stability in meat and meat products. Meat Science, 49, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myhrvold, N., Young, C., & Bilet, M. (2011). Modernist Cuisine: The Art and Science of Cooking. USA: The cooking lab.Google Scholar
  25. Nam, K. C., & Ahn, D. U. (2003). Use of antioxidants to reduce lipid oxidation and off-odor volatiles of irradiated pork homogenates and patties. Meat Science, 63(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliver, C. N., Ahn, B. W., Moerman, E. J., Goldstein, S., & Stadtman, E. R. (1987). Age-related changes in oxidized proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 262(12), 5488–5491.Google Scholar
  27. Puertolas, E., Saldana, G., Condon, S., Alvarez, I., & Raso, J. (2010). Evolution of polyphenolic compounds in red wine from Cabernet Sauvignon grapes processed by pulsed electric fields during aging in bottle. Food Chemistry, 119(3), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Purslow, P. P. (2005). Intramuscular connective tissue and its role in meat quality. Meat Science, 70(3), 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Purslow, P. P. (2014). New Developments on the role of intramuscular connective tissue in meat toughness. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 5(1), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rhee, M. S., Wheeler, T. L., Shackelford, S. D., & Koohmaraie, M. (2004). Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science, 82(2), 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roldán, M., Antequera, T., Martín, A., Mayoral, A. I., & Ruiz, J. (2013). Effect of different temperature–time combinations on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and structural features of sous-vide cooked lamb loins. Meat Science, 93(3), 572–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roldan, M., Antequera, T., Armenteros, M., & Ruiz, J. (2014). Effect of different temperature–time combinations on lipid and protein oxidation of sous-vide cooked lamb loins. Food Chemistry, 149, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santé-Lhoutellier, V., Astruc, T., Marinova, P., Greve, E., & Gatellier P.J . (2008). Effect of meat cooking on physicochemical state and in vitro digestibility of myofibrillar proteins, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(4):1488–1494.Google Scholar
  34. Sitz, B. M., Calkins, C. R., Feuz, D. M., Umberger, W. J., & Eskridge, K. M. (2006). Consumer sensory acceptance and value of wet-aged and dry-aged beef steaks. Journal of Animal Science, 84(5), 1221–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Srinivasan, S., & Hultin, H. O. (1997). Chemical, physical, and functional properties of cod proteins modified by a nonenzymic free-radical-generating system. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45(2), 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stadtman, E. R. (1990). Metal ion-catalyzed oxidation of proteins: biochemical mechanism and biological consequences. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 9(4), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun, Q., Chen, F., Geng, F., Luo, Y., Gong, S., & Jiang, Z. (2018). A novel aspartic protease from Rhizomucor miehei expressed in Pichia pastoris and its application on meat tenderization and preparation of turtle peptides. Food Chemistry, 245, 570–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suwandy, V., Carne, A., van de Ven, R., Bekhit, A. E.-D. A., & Hopkins, D. L. (2015). Effect of pulsed electric field on the proteolysis of cold boned beef M. Longissimus lumborum and M. Semimembranosus. Meat Science, 100, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Talon, R., Setrin, S. L., & Fadda, S. (2002). In F. Toldra (Ed.), Bacterial starters involved in the quality of fermented meat products (pp. 175–191). Trivandrum, India: Research Signpost.Google Scholar
  40. Trout, G. R. (1989). Variation in myoglobin denaturation and color of cooked beef, pork, and turkey meat as influenced by ph, sodium chloride, sodium tripolyphosphate, and cooking temperature. Journal of Food Science, 54(3), 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, B., & Xiong, Y. L. (1998). Functional stability of antioxidant-washed, cryoprotectant-treated beef heart surimi during frozen storage. Journal of Food Science, 63(2), 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zakrys, P. I., Hogan, S. A., O’Sullivan, M. G., Allen, P., & Kerry, J. P. (2008). Effects of oxygen concentration on the sensory evaluation and quality indicators of beef muscle packed under modified atmosphere. Meat Science, 79(4), 648–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, W. G., Lonergan, S. M., Gardner, M. A., & Huff-Lonergan, E. (2006). Contribution of postmortem changes of integrin, desmin and μ-calpain to variation in water holding capacity of pork. Meat Science, 74(3), 578–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Riddet InstitutePalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations