Advertisement

Economic Feasibility of Soybean Oil Production by Enzyme-Assisted Aqueous Extraction Processing

  • Ming-Hsun Cheng
  • Kurt A. RosentraterEmail author
  • Jasreen Sekhon
  • Tong Wang
  • Stephanie Jung
  • Lawrence A. Johnson
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Aqueous oil extraction is an approach that could replace organic solvent extraction with water. Compared to typical solvent extraction and mechanical pressing processes, aqueous extraction has higher oil recovery (over 80%) than the mechanical pressing process, and resolve issues resulted from chemical loading and remaining in the hexane extraction. Proteases are used to assist free oil release from oil bodies by hydrolyzing cotyledon cell walls in aqueous extraction process. The resulting enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction process (EAEP) includes dehulling, flaking, extruding, enzymatic extraction, and enzymatic demulsification processes. SuperPro Designer was used to conduct a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the extraction process. The total capital investment, operation cost, and profits were evaluated. During EAEP, insolubility of water and oil allows the simultaneous extraction of protein and oil. This decreases operation costs, especially the oil purification process, and therefore increases profits made from the main product (soybean oil). This simultaneous extraction also increases the profit towards the coproduct, i.e., protein in skim. Additionally, the absence of chemical and enzyme recycling contribute to the better economic value of EAEP. Despite the increase in facility costs due to extraction and demulsification units, the value-added coproduct extraction and high free oil yield contribute to the economic feasibility of EAEP in industrial- and commercial-scale productions when skim and insoluble fiber are used as water and carbohydrate supplies for integrated soy/corn ethanol biorefinery processing.

Keywords

Enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction Techno-economic analysis Soybean oil Skim Operating costs Economic feasibility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Center for Crops Utilization Research (CCUR), Iowa State University, for their assistance.

Funding Information

This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Award 2013-67021-21083.

Supplementary material

11947_2018_2228_MOESM1_ESM.docx (137 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 136 kb)

References

  1. Alibaba.com. (2016). Soya fiber: http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/soya-fiber.html. Acessed 15 Jul 2016.
  2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Occupational Employment Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm. Accessed 15 Jul 2016.
  3. Chabrand, R., & Glatz, C. (2009). Destabilization of the emulsion formed during the enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of oil from soybean flour. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 45(1), 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Moura, J., Maurer, D., Jung, S., & Johnson, L. (2011). Pilot-plant proof-of-concept for integrated, countercurrent, two-stage, enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 88(10), 1649–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domíguez, H., Núñez, M., & Lema, J. (1994). Enzymatic pretreatment to enhance oil extraction from fruits and oilseeds: a review. Food Chemistry, 49(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feedstuffs Magazine. (1980–2015). Ingredient Market. Minnetonka, MN: Miller Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Haas, M., McAloon, A., Yee, W., & Foglia, T. (2006). A process model to estimate biodiesel production costs. Bioresource Technology, 97(4), 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heinzle, E., Biwer, A., & Cooney, C. (2006). Chapter 4: sustainability assessment. In E. Heinzle, A. Biwer, & C. Cooney (Eds.), Development of sustainable bioprocesses: modeling and assessment (pp. 81–117). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, L., & Lucas, E. (1983). Comparison of alternative solvents for oils extraction. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 60(2Part1), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jung, S., & Mahfuz, A. (2009). Low temperature dry extrusion and high-pressure processing prior to enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of full fat soybean flakes. Food Chemistry, 114(3), 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jung, S., Maurer, D., & Johnson, L. (2009). Factors affecting emulsion stability and quality of oil recovered from enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of soybeans. Bioresource Technology, 100(21), 5340–5347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lamsal, B., Murphy, P., & Johnson, L. (2006). Flaking and extrusion as mechanical treatments for enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of oil from soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 83(11), 973–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, Y., Griffing, E., Higgins, M., & Overcash, M. (2006). Life cycle assessment of soybean oil production. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 29(4), 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lucas, E., Lawhon, J., & Rhee, K. (1982). Producing edible oil and protein from oilseeds by aqueous processing. Oil Mill Gazetteer, 86, 28–33.Google Scholar
  15. Ngo, H., Yee, W., McAloon, A., & Haas, M. (2014). Techno-economic analysis of an improved process for producing saturated branched-chain fatty acids. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 158–168.Google Scholar
  16. Pare, A., Nema, A., & Singh, V. (2014). Combined effect of ohmic heating and enzyme assisted aqueous extraction process on soy oil recovery. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51, 1601–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peters, M., Timmerhaus, K., & West, R. (2011). Chapter 6: analysis of cost estimation. In M. Peters, K. Timmerhaus, & R. West (Eds.), Plant design and economics for chemical engineers (pp. 226–278). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenthal, A., Pyle, L., & Niranjan, K. (1996). Aqueous and enzymatic processes for edible oil extraction. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 19(6), 402–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sekhon, J., Jung, S., Wang, T., Rosentrater, K., & Johnson, L. (2015). Effect of co-products of enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of soybeans on ethanol production in dry-grind corn fermentation. Bioresor Technol, 192, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shah, S., Sharma, A., & Gupta, M. (2005). Extraction of oil from Jatropha curcas L. seed kernels by combination of ultrasonication and aqueous enzymatic oil extraction. Bioresource Technology, 96(1), 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sigma-Aldrich. (2016). Sodium hydroxide. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/substance/sodiumhydroxide4000131073211?lang=en&region=US. Accessed 15 Jul 2016.
  22. SuperPro Designer Data Base. (2015). SuperPro Designer heat exchange resource data base. SuperPro Designer heat exchange resource data base. Scotch Plains, NJ, USA: Intelligen Inc. Accessed 15 Jul 2016.Google Scholar
  23. Ulrich, G. (1984). Chapter 6: manufacturing cost estimation. In G. Ulrich (Ed.), A guide to chemical engineering process design and economics (pp. 324–342). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd..Google Scholar
  24. USA EIA. (2016). Electricity: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#sales. Accessed 15 Jul 2016.
  25. USDA ERS. (2016). United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Oil Crops Yearbook: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/oil-crops-yearbook.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2016.
  26. Valentova, O., Novotna, Z., Svoboda, Z., Schwartz, W., & Kas, J. (2000). Microwave heating and γ-irradiation treatment of rapeseed (Brassica napus). Journal of Food Lipids, 7, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, C., Rosentrater, K., & Muthukumarappan, K. (2014). Techno-economic modeling of a corn based ethanol plant in 2011/2012. Industrial Crops and Products, 56, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu, J., Johnson, L., & Jung, S. (2009). Demulsification of oil-rich emulsion from enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of extruded soybean flakes. Bioresource Technology, 100(2), 527–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yusoff, M., Gordon, M., & Niranjan, K. (2015). Aqueous enzyme assisted oil extraction from oilseeds and emulsion de-emulsifying methods: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 41(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Biosystems EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Food Science and Human NutritionIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Food Science and Human NutritionIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  5. 5.Department of Food Science and NutritionCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA
  6. 6.Department of Food Science and Human NutritionIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations