Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 1433–1444 | Cite as

Prediction of Physical Quality Parameters of Frozen Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei): An Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm Approach

  • Imran Ahmad
  • Chawalit Jeenanunta
  • Pisit Chanvarasuth
  • Somrote Komolavanij
Original Paper

Abstract

Application of genetic algorithm to optimize an artificial neural network (ANN) model for predicting end-of-storage quality parameters of frozen shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), which influence consumer purchase decisions, is demonstrated in this paper. Freezing rate (FR), thawing rate (TR), storage time, width, thickness, and length of frozen shrimp were measured and chosen as input variables to train the ANN against Commission International de l’ Eclairage Color L*a*b* values, and textural properties (hardness, cohesiveness, and chewiness) as dependent variables. Experimentally obtained randomized data points (500) were used to develop the network, of which 20 % were used for testing the network, as an unseen environment. The developed genetic algorithm–artificial neural network (GANN) which included one hidden layer with 3–17 neurons successfully predicted color and textural values with correlation coefficient, R 2, of >0.9 and root mean square error (RMSE) of <1.6. The redness (a*) and cohesiveness took the longest training time and highest number of generations, as compared to the other parameters. Percent relative importance of input variables to output variables indicated that TR, FR, and storage time were the most important variables for the prediction of color and texture parameters. The results are compared with multiple linear regression (MLR) and ANN trained with backpropagation (BP) algorithm. The results indicate that the GANN model shows much better prediction, as compared to MLR and BP with smallest RMSE and highest R 2.

Keywords

Frozen shrimp Freezing rate Thawing rate Storage temperature GANN Genetic algorithm Artificial neural networks 

Nomenclature and abbreviations

ANN

Artificial Neural Network

FR

Freezing rate (°C min−1)

TR

Thawing rate (°C min−1)

T1

Initial product temperature (°C)

T2

Final product temperature (°C)

t1

Starting time for storage (min)

t2

Ending time for storage (min)

L*a*b*

CIE color parameters

TH

Thickness (m)

W

Width (m)

L

Length (m)

H

Hardness

Co

Cohesiveness

Ch

Chewiness

GA

Genetic Algorithm

MSE

Mean squared error

RMSE

Root mean squared error

x

Input neurons

y

Output neurons

bij

Bias

w

Weights

References

  1. Ahmad, I., Komolavanij, S., and Chanvarasuth, P. (2010). Prediction of raw milk microbial quality using data mining techniques. Agricultural Information Research, 19(3), 64–70. www.jstage.jst.go.jp on 23/10/2012.
  2. Bourne, M. C. (1978). Texture profile analysis. Food Technology, 32, 62–72.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, C. R., & Ramaswamy, H. S. (2002). Modeling and optimization of variable retort temperature (VRT) thermal processing using coupled neural networks and genetic algorithms. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, C. T., Ragsdale, & Major, R. L. (2000). Combining a neural network with a genetic algorithm for process parameter optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 13, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Enitan, A. M., & Adeyemo, J. (2011). Food processing optimization using evolutionary algorithms. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(72), 16120–16127. doi: 10.5897/AJB11.410.Google Scholar
  6. Erdoğdu, F., & Balabana, M. O. (2000). Thermal processing effects on the textural attributes of previously frozen shrimp. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 9, 1–4.Google Scholar
  7. Fathi, M., Mohebbi, M., & Razavi, S. M. A. (2011a). Application of image analysis and artificial neural network to predict mass transfer kinetics and colour changes of osmotically dehydrated kiwifruit. Food Bioprocess Technology, 4, 1357–1366. doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0222-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fathi, M., Mohebbi, M., & Razavi, S. M. A. (2011b). Effect of osmotic dehydration and air drying on physicochemical properties of dried kiwifruit and modeling of dehydration process using neural network and genetic algorithm. Food Bioprocess Technology, 4, 1519–1526. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0452-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferentinose, K. P. (2005). Biological engineering application of feed forward neural network designed by genetic algorithm. Neural Networks, 18, 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garson, G. D. (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Artificial Intelligence Expert, 6, 47–51.Google Scholar
  11. Giannakourou, M. C., Taoukis, P. S., & Nychas, G. J. E. (2006). Monitoring and control of the cold chain. In D-W. Sun (Ed.), Handbook of frozen food processing and packaging (pp. 279). CRC.Google Scholar
  12. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Goni, S. M., Oddoned, S., Segura, J. A., Mascheroni, R. H., & Salvadori, V. O. (2008). Prediction of foods freezing and thawing times: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Food Engineering, 83, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Institute of Refrigeration. (1986). Recommendations for the processing and handling of frozen foods (3rd ed.). Paris: IIR. pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
  15. Izadifar, M., & Jahromi, M. Z. (2007). Application of genetic algorithm for optimization of vegetable oil hydrogenation process. Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jindal, V. K., & Chauhan, V. (2002). Neural networks approach to modeling food processing operations. In: J. Irudayaraj (Ed.), Food processing operations modeling: design and analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Kermani, B. G., Schiffman, S. S. & Nagle, H. T. (1999). Using neural networks and genetic algorithms to enhance performance in an electronic nose. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(4), 429–439.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, X., Chen, X., Wu, W., & Peng, G. (2007). A neural network for predicting moisture content of grain drying process using genetic algorithm. Food Control, 18, 928–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luzuriaga, A. D., Murat, O., Luzuriaga, A., Murat, D., Balaban, O., & Sencer, Y. (1997). Analysis of visual quality attributes of white shrimp by machine vision. Journal of Food Science, 62(1), 113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb04379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittal, G. S., & Zhang, J. (2000). Prediction of freezing time for food products using a neural network. Food Research International, 33, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monaco, R. D., Cavella R., & Masi, P. (2007). Predicting sensory cohesiveness, hardness and springiness of solid foods from instrumental measurements. Journal of Texture Studies 39(2), 129–149.Google Scholar
  22. Morimoto, T., Baerdemaeker, J. D., & Hashimoto, Y. (1997). An intelligent approach for optimal control of fruit-storage process using neural networks and genetic algorithms. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 18, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olden, J. D., & Jackson, D. A. (2002). Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecological Modeling, 154, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pathare, P. B., Opara, U. L., & Fahad Al-Said, A. (2013). Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: a review. Food Bioprocess Technology, 6, 36–60. doi: 10.1007/s11947-012-0867-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramesh, M. N., Kumar, M. A., & Rao, P. N. S. (1996). Application of artificial neural networks to investigate the drying of cooked rice. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 19, 321–329.Google Scholar
  26. Sigurgisladottir, S., Hafsteinsson, H., Jonsson, A., Lie, O., Nortvedt, R., & Thomassen, M. (1999). Textural properties of raw salmon fillets as related to sampling method. Journal of Food Science, 64(1), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taoukis, P. S., Fu, B., & Labuza, T. P. (1991). Time–temperature indicators. Food Technology, 45, 70–82.Google Scholar
  28. Taoukis, P. S., Labuza, T. P., & Saguy, I. S. (1997). Kinetics of food deterioration and shelf-life prediction. In K. J. Valentas, E. Rotstein, & R. P. Singh (Eds.), Handbook of food engineering practice (pp. 361–403). New York: CRC.Google Scholar
  29. Thai Frozen Food Association Thailand. (2011). Downloaded from http://www.thai-frozen.or.th/index.asp on 21/9/2011.
  30. Thybo, A. K., & Martens, M. (1999). Instrumental and sensory characterization of potato texture. J Texture Studies, 30, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsironi, T., Dermesonlouoglou, E., Giannakourou, M., & Taoukis, P. (2009). Shelf life modelling of frozen shrimp at variable temperature conditions. LWT - Food Science and Technology 42(2), 664–671.Google Scholar
  32. Tsironi, T., Dermesonlouoglou, E., Giannakourou, M., & Taoukis, P. (2009). Shelf life modeling of frozen shrimp at variable temperature conditions. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 42, 664–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vongsawasdi, P. (1996). Effects of handling and preservation methods on qualities of giant freshwater prawns. Ph.D. Diss., Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.Google Scholar
  34. Wu, D., and Sun, D-W. (2012). Colour measurements by computer vision for food quality control—a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 1–16 doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.08.004.
  35. Xie, G., Xiong, R., & Church, I. (1998). Comparison of kinetics, neural network and fuzzy logic in modelling texture changes of dry peas in long time cooking. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 31, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yu, R., Leung, P., & Bienfang, P. (2006). Predicting shrimp growth: artificial neural network versus nonlinear regression models. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeng, Q. Z., Thorarinsdottir, K. A., & Olafsdottir, G. (2005). Quality changes of shrimp (Pandalus borealis) stored under different cooling conditions. J. Food Science, 70(7), 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Ahmad
    • 1
  • Chawalit Jeenanunta
    • 1
  • Pisit Chanvarasuth
    • 1
  • Somrote Komolavanij
    • 2
  1. 1.Management Technology Program, Sirindhorn International Institute of TechnologyThammasat UniversityPathum ThaniThailand
  2. 2.Panyapiwat Institute of ManagementNonthaburiThailand

Personalised recommendations