Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 1832–1839 | Cite as

Determination of Rheological Behavior, Emulsion Stability, Color, and Sensory of Sesame Pastes (Tahin) Blended with Pine Honey

  • Mehmet AkbulutEmail author
  • Cemalettin Saricoban
  • M. Musa Ozcan
Original Paper


In this research, rheological properties of blends of pine honey (3%, 6%, and 9%) with sesame pastes (tahin) produced from hulled roasted sesame seeds, called simply tahin, and from unhulled roasted sesame seeds, so-called Bozkir tahin, were determined at temperatures ranging from 10°C to 60°C and at speeds ranging from 0.5 to 100 rpm. Tahin and Bozkir tahin blends with pine honey were found to exhibit non-Newtonian, pseudoplastic behavior at all temperatures. Apparent viscosities versus speed data were successfully fitted to the power law model. The flow behavior index, n, varied in the range of 0.4226–0.6228 for the tahin–pine honey blends, and in the range of 0.4661 to −0.7266 for the Bozkir tahin–pine honey blends. The consistency index, K, was in the range of 9.34–36.42 Pa·sn for tahin–honey blends, and in the range of 9.92–37.53 Pa·sn for Bozkir tahin–honey blends. The consistency index (K) increased with increasing honey levels in both tahin types. According to statistical analysis, the exponential model was a better model to describe the effect of the soluble solids on the viscosity of tahin samples represented by the pine honey percentage. The emulsion stability of both tahin types improved with the addition of pine honey. It was also correlated with activation energy (E a), Arrhenius constant, some sensory properties such as spreadibility, firmness and overall acceptance, and color parameters such as the C and h. Temperature sensitivity of the consistency index was assessed by applying an Arrhenius type equation, and E a value appeared in the range of 7.61–10.05 kJ/mol for tahin–honey blends and in the range of 9.02–10.50 kJ/mol for Bozkir tahin–honey blends.


Tahin Bozkir tahin Pine honey Rheology Emulsion stability Sensory properties 


  1. Akbulut, M. (2008). Comparative studies of mineral contents of hulled sesame paste (tahin), unhulled sesame paste (bozkir tahin) and their blends. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 20(3), 1801–1805.Google Scholar
  2. Akbulut, M., & Coklar, H. (2008). Physicochemical and rheological properties of sesame pastes (tahin) processed from hulled and unhulled roasted sesame seeds and their blends at various levels. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 31, 488–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbulut, M., Coklar, H., & Ozen, G. (2008). Rheological characteristics of Juniperus drupacea fruit juice (pekmez) concentrated by boiling. Food Science and Technology International, 14(4), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akbulut, M., & Ozcan, M. M. (2008). Some physical, chemical, and rheological properties of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) moench) pekmez (molasses). International Journal of Food Properties, 11, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akbulut, M., Ozcan, M. M., & Coklar, H. (2009). Evaluation of antioxidant activity, phenolic, mineral contents and some physicochemical properties of several pine honeys collected from Western Anatolia. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 60(7), 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alpaslan, M., & Hayta, M. (2002). Rheological and sensory properties of pekmez (grape molasses)/tahin (sesame paste) blends. Journal of Food Engineering, 54(1), 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arslan, E., Yener, M. E., & Esin, A. (2005). Rheological characteristics of tahin/pekmez (sesame paste/concentrated grape juice) blends. Journal of Food Engineering, 69, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, S., Bhat, K. K., & Raghuver, K. G. (1992). Rheology of Bengal gram Cicer arietinum flour suspensions. Journal of Food Engineering, 17, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheftel, J. C., Cuq, J. L., & Lorient, D. (1985). Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In O. R. Fennema (Ed.), Food chemistry (pp. 245–369). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  10. Chinnan, M. S., McWaters, K. H., & Rao, V. N. M. (1985). Rheological characterization of garin legume pastes and effect of hydration time and water level on apparent viscosity. Journal of Food Science, 50, 1167–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickinson, E. (1992). An Introduction to Food Colloids. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Emadzadeh, B., Razavi, S. M. A. & Mahallati, M. N. (2011). Effect of fat replacers and sweeteners on the time-dependent rheological characteristics and emulsion stability of low calorie pistachio butter: A response surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology, doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0490-6.
  13. Hill, M. A., Mitchell, J. R., & Sherman, P. A. (1995). The relationship between the rheological and sensory properties of a lemon pie filling. Journal of Texture Studies, 26(4), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jing, H., Yap, M., Wong, P. Y. Y., & Kitts, D. D. (2009). Comparison of physicochemical and antioxidant properties of egg-white proteins and fructose and inulin Maillard reaction products. Food and Bioprocess Technology, doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0279-7.
  15. Kokini, J. L., & Dickie, R. (1982). A model of food spredability from fluid mechanics. Journal of Texture Studies, 13, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maskan, M., & Göğüş, F. (2000). Effect of sugar on the rheological properties of sunflower oil-water emulsion. Journal of Food Engineering, 43, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClements, D. J. (1999). Food Emulsions: Principles, Practice and Techniques. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  18. McClements, D. J. (2003). The rheology of emulsion-based food products. In B. M. McKenna (Ed.), Texture in Food: Semi-solid Foods (pp. 3–15). New York: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClements, D. J. (2005). Food Emulsions: Principles, Practices, and Techniques. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  20. Prinyawiwatkul, W., Beuchat, L. R., & McWatters, K. H. (1993). Functional property changes in partially defatted peanut flour caused by fungal fermentation and heat treatment. Journal of Food Science, 58, 1318–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rao, M. A. (1999). Rheology of Fluid and Semisolid Foods: Principles and Applications. Gaithersburg: Aspen.Google Scholar
  22. Sato, T., & Miyata, G. (2000). The nutraceutical benefit, part II: Honey. Nutrition, 16, 468–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, S. K., Castell-Perez, M. E., & Moreira, R. G. (2000). Viscosity and textural attributes of reduced-fat peanut pastes. Journal of Food Science, 65, 849–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiss, J., Coupland, J. N., & McClements, D. J. (1996). Solubilization on hydrocarbon emulsion droplets suspended in nonionic surfactant micelle solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100, 1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weiss, J., & Liao, W. (2000). Addition of sugars influences color of oil-in-water emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 5053–5060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wendin, K., & Hall, G. (2001). Influences of fat, thickener and emulsifier contents on salad dressing: static and dynamic sensory and rheological analyses. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 34, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Akbulut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cemalettin Saricoban
    • 1
  • M. Musa Ozcan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering, Agriculture FacultySelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations