Advertisement

Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 5, Issue 8, pp 3230–3235 | Cite as

Enhanced Production of Iranian Kefir Grain Biomass by Optimization and Empirical Modeling of Fermentation Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Mehran Ghasemlou
  • Faramarz Khodaiyan
  • Seyed Mohammad Taghi Gharibzahedi
Communication

Abstract

This study focused on the optimization of key process parameters for maximizing kefir grain biomass yield using statistical methodology. A response surface methodology (RSM) was developed to describe the effects of whey lactose and yeast concentrations, temperature and pH on increases in kefir grain biomass using cheese whey as a fermentation medium. Initially, one factor at a time was applied to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen sources. The results showed that the concentration of yeast extract significantly influenced the biomass increase. Then, a 24 full-factorial central composite design was used to optimize the process conditions. By using multiple regression analysis, the experimental data were fitted to a second-order polynomial model. RSM analysis indicated good correlation between experimental and predicted values. The most suitable combination of variables for higher biomass increase (76.13%) was 88.4 and 21.3 g/l, 5.2, and 20 °C for concentration of whey lactose, concentration of yeast extract, pH, and temperature, respectively. At these optimal conditions, biomass increased by 81.34%, which was close to the amount predicted by the model.

Keywords

Kefir grain Process optimization Microbial biomass Biomass yield Central composite design Productivity improvement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported financially by the Department of Food Science and Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Faculty, University of Tehran.

References

  1. AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis, Association Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitaraf, M. S., Khodaiyan, F., Mohammadifar, M. A., & Mousavi, S. M. (2010). Application of response surface methodology to improve fermentation time and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus reuteri. Food and Bioprocess Technology. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0433-2.Google Scholar
  3. Chopra, R., Rastogi, N. K., & Sambaiah, K. (2009). Enrichment of rice bran oil with α-linolenic acid by enzymatic acidolysis: optimization of parameters by response surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology. doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0191-1.Google Scholar
  4. Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 38(3), 350–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goršek, A., & Tramšek, M. (2007). Quantitative examination of process parameters during kefir grain biomass production. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 5, S8.Google Scholar
  6. Jeon, I. J., Galitzer, S. J., & Hennessy, K. J. (1984). Rapid determination of lactose and its hydrolyzates in whey and whey permeate by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science, 67, 884–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khodaiyan, F., Razavi, S. H., & Mousavi, S. M. (2008). Optimization of canthaxanthin production by Dietzia natronolimnaea HS-1 from cheese whey using statistical experimental methods. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 40, 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schoevers, A., & Britz, T. J. (2003). Influence of different culturing conditions on kefir grain increase. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 56, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tramšek, M., & Goršek, A. (2007). A novel approach for assuring and following inoculums activity during kefir grains growth studies—application of dynamic pH profiles. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 54, 693–699.Google Scholar
  10. Tripathi, S., & Mishra, H. N. (2009). Modeling and optimization of enzymatic degradation of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in red chili powder using response surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology. doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0387-4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehran Ghasemlou
    • 1
  • Faramarz Khodaiyan
    • 1
  • Seyed Mohammad Taghi Gharibzahedi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Campus of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran

Personalised recommendations