Technological Assessment of Chestnut Flour Doughs Regarding to Doughs from Other Commercial Flours and Formulations
- 374 Downloads
The technological assessment of chestnut flour doughs was studied using Mixolab® apparatus, establishing a comparison with gluten (soft, hard and whole wheat) and gluten-free (rice and yellow corn) flour doughs as well as corn starch pastrymaking and breadmaking formulations. This equipment measures the torque in function of temperature and time, firstly at 30 °C (mixing curve) and secondly the mixing during heating (4 °C/min up to 90 °C) and cooling (4 °C/min up to 50 °C) steps (complete curve). Different hydrations of doughs ranging from 41.4% to 68.5% (flour basis) were necessary to reach the torque of 1.10 ± 0.07 Nm. Parameters of mixing such as water absorption, development time, stability and mixing tolerance index were obtained. Parameters of heating and cooling cycle related to weakening of proteins, gelatinization starch, amylase activity and starch retrogradation as well as range of gelatinization temperatures were also determined. Chestnut flour showed suitable parameters in the mixing stage such as arrival time (1.93 ± 0.1 min), stability (12.1 ± 0.4 min) and departure time (14.0 ± 0.3 min). In the heating cycle, chestnut flour exhibited close behaviour to soft wheat flour with cooking stability of 1.12 ± 0.01 min and seems to be suitable for pastrymaking products. Finally, in the cooling cycle the behaviour revealed that products of this flour can present problems of staling and crumbs firmness due to high values (2.88 Nm) of C5 parameter.
KeywordsWheat Rice Yellow corn Mixing Gelatinization Torque Mixolab®
- AACC. (1999). Method 54/21. Minnesota, USA: Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemisrty, AACC.Google Scholar
- AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis. Washington, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.Google Scholar
- Cato, L., & Mils, C. (2008). Evaluation of the Mixolab for assessment of flour quality. Food Australlian, 60, 577–581.Google Scholar
- Codina, G. G., Bordei, D., & Paslaru, V. (2008). The effects of different doses of gluten on rheological behaviour of dough and bread quality. Romanian Biotechnology Letters, 13, 37–42.Google Scholar
- D’Appolonia, B. L., & Kunerth, W. H. (1984). The farinograph handbook. Minnesota, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemistry.Google Scholar
- Eliasson, A. C., & Gudmundsson, M. (1996). Starch: Physochemical and functional aspects. In A. C. Eliasson (Ed.), Carbohydrates in food. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2009). < http://www.fao.org/infoods/directory_en.stm >.
- Galliard, T., & Bowler, P. (1987). Morphology and composition of starch. In T. Galliard (Ed.), Starch: Properties and potencial. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- ICC (2008) ICC-standard methods nos. 110/1, 115/1, 173. International Association for Cereal Chemistry.Google Scholar
- Levine, L., & Boehmer, E. (1997). Dough processing systems. In K. J. Valentas, E. Rotstein, & R. P. Singh (Eds.), Handbook of food engineering practice. New York, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- McGee. (2004). On food and cooking: The science and lore of the kitchen. Dallas, USA: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Medcalf, D. G., & Gillis, K. A. (1965). Wheat starches I. Comparison of physicochemical properties. Cereal Chemistry, 42, 558–568.Google Scholar
- Milde, L.B., Ramallo, L.A., & Puppo, M.C. (2010) Gluten-free bread based on tapioca starch: Texture and sensory studies. Food Bioprocess Technology, doi:10.1007/s11947-010-0381-x, in press.
- Mixolab®. (2008). Mixolab® user’s manual. Villeneuve la Garenne, France: Tripette & Renaud Chopin.Google Scholar
- Moreira, R., Chenlo, F., Torres, M.D., & Prieto, D.M. (2010a) Desorption isotherms and net isosteric heat of chestnut flour and starch. Food and Bioprocess Technology, doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0239-2, in press.
- Rosell, C. M., & Marco, C. (2008). Rice. In E. K. Arendt & F. Dal Bello (Eds.), Gluten free cereal product and beverages. London, UK: Academic.Google Scholar
- Rosell, C. M., Collar, C., & Haros, M. (2007). Assessment of hydrocolloid effects on the thermo-mechanical properties of wheat using the Mixolab. Food Hydrocolloids, 21, 454–462.Google Scholar