Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 300–307

Gloss Evaluation of Curved-surface Fruits and Vegetables

Original Paper


Gloss measurements are used to evaluate the quality and appearance of a product, especially in cases where esthetic appearance is of importance. Most commercial glossmeters are designed for measuring products of flat surface and therefore are not suitable for food products because of their uneven, curved surface. A new generation of commercial glossmeters is recently available for confined areas, curved surfaces, and surfaces that are not uniform. This article provides a brief review of gloss measurement principles and methods for fresh fruits and vegetables. It reports on the gloss measurement of apples and other fresh products using a commercial glossmeter and a specially designed spectrometer-based gloss measurement prototype integrated with imaging and automatic sample positioning capabilities. Results showed that the prototype had a nonlinear relationship with standard gloss measurements. With the new setup, the gloss of apples was measured with the repeatability for 90% of the measurements being better than 16%, calculated as the ratio of the difference between maximum and minimum gloss values to the mean value in percent. Further research is needed to simplify the imaging/mechanical configuration and improve the coordinate calculation algorithm to achieve more accurate, repeatable gloss measurements.


Gloss Appearance Quality Fruit Apple Spectrometer 


  1. Bai, J., Alleyne, V., Hagenmaier, R. D., Mattheis, J. P., & Baldwin, E. A. (2003a). Formulation of zein coatings for apples (Malus domestica Borkh). Postharvest Biology and Technology, 28(2), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, J. H., Hagenmaier, R. D., & Baldwin, E. A. (2003b). Coating selection for ‘delicious’ and other apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 28(3), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frary, A., Doganlar, S., Daunay, M. C., & Tanksley, S. D. (2003). QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant and implications for conservation of gene function during evolution of solanaceous species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 107(2), 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hunter, R. S., & Richard, W. H. (1987). The measurement of appearance (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Hutchings, J. B. (1999). Food color and appearance (2nd ed.). Gaithersburg, Md: Aspen.Google Scholar
  6. Jha, S. N., & Matsuoka, T. (2002). Development of freshness index of eggplant. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 18(5), 555–558.Google Scholar
  7. Jha, S. N., Matsuoka, T., & Miyauchi, K. (2002). Surface gloss and weight of eggplant during storage. Biosystems Engineering, 81(4), 407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nussinovitch, A., & Mey-Tal, E. (1994). Novel glossmeter for the measurement of food appearance including fresh produce and man-made materials. Israel patent application #109,033.Google Scholar
  9. Nussinovitch, A., Ward, G., & Lurie, S. (1996a). Nondestructive measurement of peel gloss and roughness to determine tomato fruit ripening and chilling injury. Journal of Food Science, 61(2), 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nussinovitch, A., Ward, G., & Mey-Tal, E. (1996b). Gloss of fruits and vegetables. Food Science and Technology (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft & Technologie), 29(1–2), 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Porat, R., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., & Biton, A. (2005). Effects of polyethylene wax content and composition on taste, quality, and emission of off-flavor volatiles in ‘Mor’ mandarins. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 38(3), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Szczesniak, A. S. (1983). Physical properties of foods. Paper read at IFT-IUFoST Basic Symposium, at Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  13. Ward, G., & Nussinovitch, A. (1996a). Gloss properties and surface morphology relationships of fruits. Journal of Food Science, 61(5), 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ward, G., & Nussinovitch, A. (1996b). Peel gloss as a potential indicator of banana ripeness. Food Science and Technology (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft & Technologie), 29(3), 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA ARS Sugarbeet and Bean Research UnitMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.School of PackagingMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Agricultural EngineeringAgricultural Research Organization, the Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael

Personalised recommendations