Difficult bile duct stones
- 70 Downloads
Bile duct stones are routinely removed at time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after biliary sphincterotomy with standard balloon or basket extraction techniques. However, in approximately 10% to 15% of patients, bile duct stones may be difficult to remove due to challenging access to the bile duct (periampullary diverticulum, Billroth II anatomy, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy), large (> 15 mm in diameter) bile duct stones, intrahepatic stones, or impacted stones in the bile duct or cystic duct. The initial approach to the removal of the difficult bile duct stone is to ensure adequate biliary sphincter orifice diameter with extension of biliary sphincterotomy or balloon dilation of the orifice. Mechanical lithotripsy is a readily available adjunct to standard stone extraction techniques and should be available in all ERCP units. If stone extraction fails with these maneuvers, two or more bile duct stents should be inserted, and ursodiol added to aid in duct decompression, stone fragmentation, and stone dissolution. Follow-up ERCP attempts to remove the difficult bile duct stones may be performed locally if expertise is available or alternatively referred to a tertiary center for advanced extracorporeal or intracorporeal fragmentation (mother-baby laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy) techniques. Nearly all patients with bile duct stones can be treated endoscopically if advanced techniques are utilized. For the rare patient who fails despite these efforts, surgical bile duct exploration, percutaneous approach to the bile duct, or long-term bile duct stenting should be discussed with the patient and family to identify the most appropriate therapeutic option. A thoughtful approach to each patient with difficult bile duct stones and a healthy awareness of the operator/endoscopy unit limitations is necessary to ensure the best patient outcomes. Consultation with a dedicated tertiary ERCP specialty center may be necessary.
KeywordsBile Duct Common Bile Duct Stone Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Bile Duct Stone Laser Lithotripsy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 7.Mathuna PM, White P, Clarke E, et al.: Endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty (papillary dilation) for bile duct stones: efficacy, safety, and follow-up in 100 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995, 42:468–474. initial study of a large number of patients revealing that papillary orifice balloon dilation in patients with average size stones up to 20 mm in diameter was effective in the majority of patients and relatively safe.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Baron TH, Harewood GC: Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1455–1460. Wwll-performed meta-analysis of eight controlled trials showing that papillary balloon dilation is the preferred strategy in patients with coagulopathy but should be used with caution in all patients because the risk of pancreatitis is higher as compared with sphincterotomy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F: Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:156–159. Papillary balloon dilation up to 20 mm in diameter in combination with biliary sphincterotomy at the same setting may be effective in duct clearance of large bile duct stones, with modestly increased risk of bleeding and mild pancreatitis.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ, et al.: A randomized trial of endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with a prior Billroth II gastrectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:19–26. In a population of 34 Billroth II patients with bile duct stones, papillary orifice balloon dilation is safer and does not increase procedure time or the need for mechanical lithotripsy as compared with sphincterotomy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, et al.: Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones; report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995, 42:195–201. A report on the high (40%) complication rate in patients with unextractable bile duct stones treated with long-term bile duct stents that further supports the use of temporary bile duct stenting prior to definitive treatment of the bile duct stones with intracorporeal lithotripsy with or without ESWL or surgery.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Garg PK, Tandon RK, Ahuja V, et al.: Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:601–605. A study of 87 patients with difficult bile duct stones requiring mechanical lithotripsy and the factors that would predict success of complete clearance of bile duct stones. Stones that were impacted and entrapped were the only significant predictors of failure. Size of stone, numbers of stones, bile duct diameter, and stone composition were not predictors of failure.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, et al.: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:2330–2334. A 12-year review of a large series of patients undergoing electrohydraulic lithotripsy revealing a successful outcome with complete clearance of stones in 96% of patients, with acceptable morbidity and no mortality.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Jakobs R, Adamek HE, Maier M, et al.: Fluoroscopically guided laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for retained bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study. Gut 1997, 40:678–682. This prospective, randomized trial comparing intra- and extracorporeal lithotripsy for large bile duct stones revealed a tendency toward a higher stone-free rate, fewer fragmentation sessions, and fewer number of ERCP required when intracorporeal laser lithotripsy was used as the first-line method.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Neuhaus H, Zillinger C, Born P, et al.: Randomized study of intracorporeal laser lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 47:327–334. A randomized trial comparing two endoscopic modalities for the management of difficult bile duct stones. Intracorporeal laser lithotripsy was the clear winner in this prospective study, with higher efficacy and fewer sessions. With both ESWL and intracorporeal laser lithotripsy, morbidity was low and mortality was zero. Laser lithotripsy was also effective in patients failing ESWL.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar