Nonsurgical therapy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

  • Phyllis R. Bishop
  • Michael J. Nowicki

Opinion statement

  • The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) remains problematic and is less than ideal. Prospective, well-designed studies assessing the efficacy of treatment for SRUS are few; most of the knowledge imparted for treating SRUS is experiential. As such, firm treatment recommendations can not be made. Rather, a conservative, stepwise, individualized approach must be employed. Diagnostic modalities should be incorporated in the management scheme to direct treatment when indicated.

  • Management must include patient reassurance that the underlying lesion is benign, because complete “cures” are uncommon in those with SRUS. The goals of therapy should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Although the ultimate goal is macroscopic and microscopic healing, a realistic goal is cessation or minimization of symptoms.

  • We outline a reasonable approach to the management of SRUS. Histologic confirmation of SRUS should prompt a discussion of the presumed pathogenic mechanisms with the patient. Conservative therapy with dietary fiber, bowel retraining, and bulk laxatives should be employed. If symptoms persist, the patient should receive a trial of sucralfate enemas for 6 weeks. Individuals who respond should continue conservative therapy. However, if symptoms persist, defecography can be done to assess for inappropriate puborectalis contraction and occult rectal mucosal prolapse. Patients with inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis can be offered biofeedback. Patients with occult rectal mucosal prolapse can be considered for surgery. However, the risks, benefits, and success rates of surgery should be discussed at length, prior to any procedure being performed. Rectopexy or Delorme’s procedure offer the best success rates to date; however, the choice of surgical procedure must take into account the experience of the surgeon and wishes of the patient.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Madigan MR, Morson BC: Solitary ulcer of the rectum. Gut 1969, 10:871–881.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin CJ, Parks TG, Biggart JD: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in Northern Ireland, 1971–1980. Br J Surg 1981, 68:744–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niv Y, Bat L: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome—clinical, endoscopic, and histological spectrum. Am J Gastroenterol 1986, 81:486–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy DK, Hughes ESR, Masterson JP: The natural history of benign ulcer of the rectum. Surg Gyn Obstet 1977, 144:718–720.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ford MJ, Anderson JR, Gilmour HM, et al.: Clinical spectrum of “solitary ulcer”of the rectum. Gastroenterology 1983, 84:1533–1540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tjandra JT, Fazio VW, Church JM, et al.: Clinical conundrum of solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum 1992, 35:227–234. One of the largest series of patients with SRUS reported to date (n = 80). The authors report on the clinical features, evaluation, and response to therapy of patients with SRUS and compare them with 11 previous large series. Also, the outcome of treatment is correlated with the type of lesion present and the presence or absence of rectal prolapse.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haray PN, Morris-Stiff GF, Foster ME: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome—an underdiagnosed condition. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997, 12:313–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowland R, Hecker R, Willing R, Gibson G: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. A report of fifteen cases. Med J Aust 1976, 1(suppl):21–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keighley MRB, Shouler P: Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1984, 27:507–512. This article reports on the manometric findings for patients with SRUS and compares them with normal controls. There is also a good discussion of clinical features and response to various treatment regimens.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stuart M: Proctitis cystica profunda. Incidence, etiology, and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1984, 27:153–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    vanden Brandt-Grädel V, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GNJ: Treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with highfiber diet and abstention of straining at defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1984, 29:1005–1008. Although a small study (n = 21), this is the best study to show the benefit of treatment with a high-fiber diet and avoidance of straining with defecation.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saul SH, Sollenberger LC: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Its clinical and pathological underdiagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 1985, 9:411–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Britto E, Borges AM, Path MRC, et al.: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Twenty cases seen at an oncology center. Dis Colon Rectum 1987, 30:381–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Womack NR, Williams NS, Holmfield JHM, Morrison JFB: Pressure and prolapse—the cause of solitary rectal ulceration. Gut 1987, 28:1228–1233. This study assessed the importance of intrarectal pressure and mucosal prolapse as causative factors in SRUS using defecography, manometry, and electromyography. Includes an excellent discussion and review of the pathophysiology of SRUS.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Binnie NR, Papachrysostomou M, Clare M, Smith AN: Solitary rectal ulcer: the place of biofeedback and surgery in the treatment of the syndrome. World J Surg 1992, 16:836–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vora IM, Sharma J, Joshi AS: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and colitis cystica profunda—a clinicopathological review. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1992, 2:94–102.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ho YH, Ho JMS, Parry BR, Goh HS: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: the clinical entity and anorectal physiological findings in Singapore. Aust N Z J Surg 1995, 65:93–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaizey CJ, Roy AJ, Kamm MA: Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback. Gut 1997, 41:817–820. A small study (n = 13) documenting the benefit of biofeedback in the treatment of patients with SRUS, despite the absence of any identifiable pretreatment prognostic predictors.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pescatori M, Quondamcarlo C: A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 1999, 14:245–249. This article proposes an endoscopic grading system for internal mucosal prolapse, then shows a correlation between the degree of prolapse and severity of symptoms. The authors offer an algorithm for the treatment of SRUS based on the degree of mucosal prolapse seen at proctoscopy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchal F, Bresler L, Brunaud L, et al.: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001, 16:228–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bishop PR, Nowicki MJ, Subramony C, Parker PH: Solitary rectal ulcer. A rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in an adolescent with hemophilia A. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001, 33:72–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Snooks SJ, Nicholls RJ, Henry MM, et al.: Electrophysiological and manometric assessment of the pelvic floor in the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1985, 72:131–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuijpers HC, Schreve RH, Hoedemakers HTC: Diagnosis of functional disorders of defecation causing the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1986, 29:126–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levin MS, Piccolello ML, Sollenberger LC, et al.: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a radiologic diagnosis? Gastrointest Radiol 1986, 11:187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Millward SF, Bayjoo B, Dixon MF, et al.: The barium enema appearances in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Clin Radiol 1985, 36:185–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P: Defecography. 1. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. 2. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984, 9:247–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goei R, Baeten C, Janevski B, et al.: The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: diagnosis with defecography. Am J Roentgenol 1987, 149:933–936.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mackle EJ, Parks TG: The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of rectal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol 1986, 15:985–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rutter KRP: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Proc R Soc Med 1975, 68:22–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA: Rectal prolapse, intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2001, 30:199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vaizey CJ, vanden Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, et al.: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998, 85:1617–1623. A very good overall review of SRUS that discusses pathogenic mechanisms, clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lam TCF, Lubowski DZ, King DW: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Bailliere’s Clin Gastroenterol 1992, 6:129–143. Another very good overall review of SRUS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mackle EJ, Parks TG: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: aetiology, investigation and management. Dig Dis 1990, 8:294–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Batman F, Arslan S, Telatar H: Effect of sucralfate in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer [letter]. Endoscopy 1988, 20:128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kochhar R, Mehta SK, Aggarwal R, et al.: Sucralfate enema in ulcerative rectosigmoid lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 1990, 33:45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zargar SA, Khuroo MS, Mahajan R: Sucralfate retention enemas in solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum 1991, 34:455–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carling L, Kagevi I, Borvall E: Sucralfate enema (SUC)—effective in IBD [letter]? Endoscopy 1986:18:115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ederle A, Bulighin G, Orlandi PG, Pilati S: Endoscopic application of human fibrin sealant in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Endoscopy 1992, 24:736–737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rau BK, Harikrishnan KM, Krishna S: Laser therapy of solitary rectal ulcers: a new concept. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994, 23:27–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Över H, Ülker A, Baysal Ç, Dagli Ü: Endoscopic balloon dilation of strictures complicating solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Endoscopy 1997, 29:427–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sitzler PJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, McKee RF: Long-term clinical outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998, 85:1246–1250. A retrospective review of outcome for patients (n = 81) having surgery for SRUS. This article includes a good review of the surgical options available for the treatment of SRUS.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schweiger M, Alexander-Williams J: Solitary-ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Its association with occult rectal prolapse. Lancet 1977, 1:70–71.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vilotte J, Siproudhis L, Leblanc S, et al.: Does retraining by biofeedback have a role in the treatment of solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1990, 14:405–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sarles J, Arnaud A, Joly A, Sielezneff I: Internal procidentia of the rectum: therapeutic possibilities. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1991, 15:124–129.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Halligan S, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI: Proctographic changes after rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and preoperative predictive factors for a successful outcome. Br J Surg 1995, 82:314–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tjandra JT, Fazio VW, Petras RE, et al.: Clinical and pathological factors associated with delayed diagnosis in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1993, 36:146–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nicholls RJ, Simson JNL: Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1986, 73:222–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yamagiwa H: Protruded variants in solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Acta Pathol Jpn 1988, 38:471–478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sielezneff I, Malouf A, Cesari J, et al.: Selection criteria for internal rectal prolapse repair by Delorme’s transrectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:367–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eigenmann PA, LeCoultre C, Cox J, et al.: Solitary rectal ulcer: an unusual cause of rectal bleeding in children. Eur J Pediatr 1992, 151:658–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phyllis R. Bishop
    • 1
  • Michael J. Nowicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations