Variceal hemorrhage

  • Lisa A. Brandenburger
  • Fredric G. Regenstein
Article

Opinion statement

Reducing morbidity and mortality from esophageal varices remains a challenge for physicians managing patients with chronic liver disease. For patients who have never bled from varices, prophylactic therapy with nonselective beta-blockers reduces the risk of initial variceal bleeding and bleeding-related death. Thus, patients with newly diagnosed cirrhosis should be considered for endoscopic variceal screening. All patients with Child’s class B and C cirrhosis should be offered endoscopic screening, whereas those with Child’s class A with evidence of portal hypertension (eg, platelet count less than 140,000 per milliliter, portal vein diameter larger than 13 mm, evidence of splenic varices on ultrasound) should be screened. The principal risk factors for variceal bleeding are variceal size, the presence of color changes on the variceal wall (indicative of decreased wall thickness), and degree of liver dysfunction. Patients with moderate or large sized varices and those with varices exhibiting color changes (eg, red wale marks, cherry red spots) should be treated with beta-blockers. Individuals without varices and those with small varices should undergo repeat endoscopy at approximately 2-year intervals. Patients unwilling or unable to take beta-blockers do not need to be screened. For patients with acute variceal bleeding, the combination of pharmacologic therapy plus endoscopic therapy is superior to either therapy alone. Octreotide is the drug most often used as initial therapy in the United States. Terlipressin is the preferred agent; however, it is not available in the United States. Endoscopy is performed as early as possible, and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or endoscopic variceal band ligation is employed if variceal bleeding is confirmed or suspected. Endoscopic therapy should be repeated until the varices are obliterated completely. The addition of beta-blockers to endoscopic sclerotherapy or ligation may decrease the rate of rebleeding compared with receiving endoscopic treatment alone. Patients with bleeding refractory to combined medical plus endoscopic therapy should be considered for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts or shunt surgery.

Keywords

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting Esophageal Varix Variceal Bleeding Main Drug Interaction Endoscopic Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    D’Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J: Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Sem Liver Dis 1999, 19:475–505. A comprehensive review of current pharmacologic approaches, including terlipressin, which currently is not available in the United States.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schepis F, Camma C, Niceforo D, et al.: Which patients with cirrhosis should undergo endoscopic screening for esophageal varices detection? Hepatology 2001, 33:333–338. Comments on screening patients and when to perform endoscopy on patients with known low-risk varices to improve cost effectiveness.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zaman A, Hapke R, Flora K, et al.: Factors predicting the presence of esophageal or gastric varices in patients with advanced liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:3292–3296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalasani N, Imperiale T, Ismail A, et al.: Predictors of large esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999, 94:3285–3291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann R, Fisher R, et al.: Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology 1985, 5:419–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rimola A, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M, et al.: Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. J Hepatol 2000, 32:142–153. Covers the spectrum of treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, including its usefulness as related to gastrointestinal hemorrhage.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merkel C, Marin R, Sacerdoti D, et al.: Long-term results of a clinical trial of nadolol with or without isosorbide mononitrate for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2000, 31:324–329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angelico M, Carli L, Piat C, et al.: Effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate compared with propranolol on first bleeding and long-term survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1997, 113:1632–1639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D’Amico G, Politi F, Morabito A, et al.: Octreotide compared with placebo in a treatment strategy for early rebleeding in cirrhosis. A double blind, randomized pragmatic trial. Hepatology 1998, 28:1206–1214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prophylactic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in men with alcoholic liver disease. A randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinic trial. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Variceal Sclerotherapy Group. N Eng J Med 1991, 324:1779–1784.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gralnek I, Jensen D, Kovacs T, et al.: The economic impact of esophageal variceal hemorrhage: costeffectiveness implications of endoscopic therapy. Hepatology 1999, 29:44–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corley D, Cello J, Adkisson W, et al.: Octreotide for acute esophageal variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2001, 120:946–954. Octreotide use in patients with acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage significantly improves sustained control of bleeding compared with other therapies and has comparable efficacy to immediate sclerotherapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lo G, Lai K, Cheng J, et al.: Endoscopic variceal ligation plus nadolol and sucralfate compared with ligation alone for the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a prospective, randomized trial. Hepatology 2000, 32:461–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cello J, Ring E, Olcott E, et al.: Endoscopic sclerotherapy compared with percutaneous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after initial sclerotherapy in patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. Ann Intern Med 1997, 126:858–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Russo M, Zacks S, Sander R, et al.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosytemic shunt (TIPS) versus endoscopic therapy for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding. Hepatology 2000, 31:358–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng Y, Pan S, Lien G, et al.: Adjuvant sclerotherapy after ligation for the treatment of esophageal varices: a prospective, randomized long-term study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:566–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakamura S, Mitsunaga A, Murata Y, et al.: Endoscopic induction of mucosal fibrosis by argon plasma coagulation (APC) for esophageal varices: a prospective randomized trial of ligation plus APC versus ligation alone. Endoscopy 2001, 33:210–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cejna M, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Thurner SA, et al.: Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with stent-grafts: initial experiences with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol endoprosthesis. Radiology 2001, 221:437–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa A. Brandenburger
    • 1
  • Fredric G. Regenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Gastroenterology and HepatologyTulane University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations