Advertisement

Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Arm and Chest Vasculature: Tips and Tricks

  • Devang S. Parikh
  • Kejal Gandhi
  • Adhir ShroffEmail author
Coronary Artery Disease (D Feldman and V Voudris, Section Editors)
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Purpose of review

The purpose of this review is to identify the anatomical difficulties an operator may encounter during the transradial approach for cardiac catheterization and to offer tips and tricks to overcome those challenges.

Recent findings

With increasing implementation of the transradial approach for cardiac catheterization, many new techniques have been utilized to overcome anatomical challenges. This article also discusses the difficulties faced during transradial approach in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Summary

Numerous large randomized trials have demonstrated the value of the transradial approach over the transfemoral approach during cardiac catheterization. However, this technique is routinely avoided or aborted due to anatomical variations in the upper arm and chest. These obstacles have delayed adoption of transradial access by operators despite the apparent benefits. This article reviews some of the available tips and tricks described in the literature to overcome anatomical obstacles. By implementing some of these tools into practice, an operator may realize improved procedural success, decreased procedure time, and improved patient comfort with the transradial approach.

Keywords

Transradial approach Cardiac catheterization Coronary artery bypass grafting Radial percutaneous coronary intervention 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention. historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh S, Singh M, Grewal N, Khosla S. Transradial vs transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32:777–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S, Rao S, Bertrand OF, Kwan T. Balloon-assisted tracking: a must-know technique to overcome difficult anatomy during transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dash D. Troubleshooting in transradial catheterization: the lessons learnt so far. Cit Dash D J Hear Heal. 2016;2:1–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbeau GR. Radial loop and extreme vessel tortuosity in the transradial approach: advantage of hydrophilic-coated guidewires and catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;59:442–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lo TS, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart. 2009;95:410–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rigatelli G, et al. Strategies to overcome hostile subclavian anatomy during transradial coronary angiography and interventions: impact on fluoroscopy, procedural time, complications, and radial patency. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27:428–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cha KS, Kim MH, Kim HJ. Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1220–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, et al. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Am Heart J. 2011;161:172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah RM, Patel D, Abbate A, Cowley MJ, Jovin IS. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:1027–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsen P, Shah S, Waxman S, Freilich M, Riskalla N, Piemonte T, et al. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel TM, Shah S, Pancholy SB. Strategies to traverse the arm and chest vasculature. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015;4:127–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valgimigli M, Campo G, Penzo C, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Ferrari R. Transradial coronary catheterization and intervention across the whole spectrum of Allen test results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1833–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burzotta F, Trani C, Hamon M, Amaroso G, Kiemeneij F. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: tips and tricks. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sandhu K, Butler R, Nolan J. Expert opinion: transradial coronary artery procedures: tips for success. Interv Cardiol (London, England). 2017;12:18–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois – ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.B.J. Medical College, AhmedabadAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations