Mobile Health Initiatives to Improve Outcomes in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

  • Bruno Urrea
  • Satish Misra
  • Timothy B. Plante
  • Heval M. Kelli
  • Sanjit Misra
  • Michael J. Blaha
  • Seth S. Martin
Prevention (L Sperling and D Gaita, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Prevention

Opinion statement

Cardiovascular disease affects more than a third of American adults and is the leading cause of mortality in the USA. Over the last 40 years, several behavioral and medical risk factors have been recognized as major contributors to cardiovascular disease. Effective management of many of these risk factors, particularly behavioral risk factors, remains challenging. With the growth of mobile health (mHealth) technology, a variety of novel strategies are now available to facilitate the delivery of interventions directed at reducing these risk factors. In this review, we discuss recent clinical studies and technologic innovations leveraging smartphone devices, social media, and wearable health tracking devices to facilitate behavioral interventions directed at three important and highly prevalent behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular disease: smoking, physical inactivity, and sub-optimal nutrition. We believe this technology has significant potential to provide low-cost, scalable, and individualized tools to improve management of these important cardiovascular disease risk factors.


Prevention Cardiovascular disease Risk factors Mobile health technology 

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance.

  1. 1.
    Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2014. Accessed 3 Sept 2015.
  2. 2.
    Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. 2014;131(4).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. Jama. 2014;311(8):806–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State indicator report on physical activity. Centers Dis Control Prev. 2010:15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general, executive summary. 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. Observatory. 2011;3:112.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith A. U.S. smartphone use in 2015. 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for health. Pew Internet. 2013:1–40.Google Scholar
  9. 9.••
    Spohr SA, Nandy R, Gandhiraj D, Vemulapalli A, Anne S, Walters ST. Efficacy of SMS text message interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015. Analysis of the current SMS text message based interventions for smoking cessation and their effect on individual quit rates.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whittaker R, Mcrobbie H, Bullen C, Borland R, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation (review). 2012;(11).Google Scholar
  11. 11.••
    Abroms LC, Boal AL, Simmens SJ, Mendel JA, Windsor RA. A randomized trial of Text2Quit. A text messaging program for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(3):242–50. Evaluates the effects of Text2Quit, a program that is widely offered in the U.S. through quitlines.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ybarra ML, Holtrop JS, Prescott TL, Strong D. Process evaluation of a mHealth program: lessons learned from stop my smoking USA, a text messaging-based smoking cessation program for young adults. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(2):239–43.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buller DB, Borland R, Bettinghaus EP, Shane JH, Zimmerman DE. Randomized trial of a smartphone mobile application compared to text messaging to support smoking cessation. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(3):206–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vilaplana J, Solsona F, Abella F, Cuadrado J, Alves R, Mateo J. S-PC: an e-treatment application for management of smoke-quitting patients. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2014;115(1):33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heffner JL, Vilardaga R, Mercer LD, Kientz JA, Bricker JB. Feature-level analysis of a novel smartphone application for smoking cessation. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41(1):68–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.••
    Abroms LC, Lee Westmaas J, Bontemps-Jones J, Ramani R, Mellerson J. A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(6):732–6. Evaluates the implementation of clinical practice guidelines and evidence based practices of popular apps on Android and IOS markets.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.••
    Bricker JB, Mull KE, Kientz JA, Vilardaga R, Mercer LD, Akioka KJ, et al. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:87–94. Compares the Smartquit app with the national cancer institute QuitGuide app, and highlights the importance of using behavioral change theories on smartphone applications.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    BinDhim NF, McGeechan K, Trevena L. Who uses smoking cessation apps? A feasibility study across three countries via smartphones. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):1–11.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duke JC, Hansen H, Kim AE, Curry L, Allen J. The use of social media by state tobacco control programs to promote smoking cessation: a cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(7):e169.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Struik LL, Baskerville NB. The role of facebook in crush the crave, a mobile- and social media-based smoking cessation intervention: qualitative framework analysis of posts. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(7):e170.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Propeller Health—the leading mobile platform for respiratory health management. [Online]. Available: Accessed 19 Aug 2015.
  22. 22.
    How it works—Proteus digital health. [Online]. Available: Accessed 19 Aug 2015.
  23. 23.
    MD2K. [Online]. Available: Accessed 14 Aug 2015.
  24. 24.
    D. C. Washington and 20201. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. The Secretary of Health and Human Services. 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franklin NC. Technology to promote and increase physical activity in heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2015;11(1):173–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bort-Roig J, Gilson ND, Puig-Ribera A, Contreras RS, Trost SG. Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2014;44(5):671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richards J, Thorogood M, Hillsdon M, Foster C. Face-to-face versus remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9(9), CD010393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naimark JS, Madar Z, Shahar DR. The impact of a web-based app (eBalance) in promoting healthy lifestyles: randomized controlled trial. 2015;17(3):1–14.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duncan M, Vandelanotte C, Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR, Caperchione CM, George ES, et al. Effectiveness of a web- and mobile phone-based intervention to promote physical activity and healthy eating in middle-aged males: randomized controlled trial of the ManUp study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e136.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Apple–iPhone 6–technology. [Online]. Available: Accessed 17 Aug 2015.
  31. 31.••
    Glynn LG, Hayes PS, Casey M, Glynn F, Alvarez-Iglesias A, Newell J, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care: the SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(624):e384–91. Evaluates of the effectiveness of a comercial available smartphone application to increase physical activity.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Casey M, Hayes PS, Glynn F, OLaighin G, Heaney D, Murphy AW, et al. Patients’ experiences of using a smartphone application to increase physical activity: the SMART MOVE qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(625):e500–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hekler EB, Buman MP, Grieco L, Rosenberger M, Winter SJ, Haskell W, et al. Validation of physical activity tracking via android smartphones compared to ActiGraph accelerometer: laboratory-based and free-living validation studies. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(2):e36.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.•
    Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. 2015;313(6):6–7. Assesses the step tracking accuracy of smarphone applications and wearable devices in comparison with a validated pedometer for research.Google Scholar
  35. 35.•
    Conroy DE, Yang CH, Maher JP. Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(6):649–52. Review of top ranked physical activity applications and the inclusion of behavioral change techniques in their platform.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.••
    Burke LE, Ma J, Azar KMJ, Bennett GG, Peterson ED, Zheng Y, et al. Current science on consumer use of mobile health for cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation. 2015;132(12):1157–213. Review of the use of mobile technologies to reduce cardiovascular risks, showing the necessity for more studies providing evidence for the effectiveness of technology in health interventions.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.•
    Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–60. Highlights the barriers present when using wearable devices as drivers for behavioral change.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.••
    Martin SS, Feldman DI, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Post WS, McKibben RA, et al. mActive: a randomized clinical trial of an automated mHealth intervention for physical activity promotion. JAHA. 2015;in press. Novel approach to improve physical activity by using an automated and personalized text messages platform.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Compernolle S, Vandelanotte C, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K. Effectiveness of a web-based, computer-tailored, pedometer-based physical activity intervention for adults: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e38.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.•
    Maddison R, Rawstorn JC, Rolleston A, Whittaker R, Stewart R, Benatar J, et al. The remote exercise monitoring trial for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (REMOTE-CR): a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1236. Novel approach to deliver remote cardiac rehabilitation and comparison of the effectiviness with traditional cardiac rehabilition.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Health app Pact saves hundreds on health insurance for healthy living—iMedicalApps. [Online]. Available: Accessed 17 Aug 2015.
  42. 42.
    Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Loria CM, Millen BE, Comuzzie AG, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society Methodology Members. 2013:1–70.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Calorie Counter–MyFitnessPal–android apps on Google Play. [Online]. Available: Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
  44. 44.
    Lose it! - how lose it! is helping real people. [Online]. Available: Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
  45. 45.
    Martin CK, Miller AC, Thomas DM, Champagne CM, Han H, Church T. Efficacy of SmartLoss SM, a smartphone-based weight loss intervention: results from a randomized controlled trial. Obesity. 2015;23(5):935–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.•
    Wharton CM, Johnston CS, Cunningham BK, Sterner D. Dietary self-monitoring, but not dietary quality, improves with use of smartphone app technology in an 8-week weight loss trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(5):440–4. Highlights the importance of integrating diet counseling to improve diet quality when using smartphone applications.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Temple NJ, Fraser J. Food labels: a critical assessment. Nutrition. 2013;30(3):1–4.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dunford E, Trevena H, Goodsell C, Ng KH, Webster J, Millis A, et al. FoodSwitch: a mobile phone app to enable consumers to make healthier food choices and crowdsourcing of national food composition data. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2(3):e37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Turner-McGrievy GM, Helander EE, Kaipainen K, Perez-Macias JM, Korhonen I. The use of crowdsourcing for dietary self-monitoring: crowdsourced ratings of food pictures are comparable to ratings by trained observers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014:1–6.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang W, Yu Q, Siddiquie B, Divakaran A, Sawhney H. ‘Snap-n-Eat’: food recognition and nutrition estimation on a smartphone. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(3):525–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Urrea
    • 2
  • Satish Misra
    • 3
  • Timothy B. Plante
    • 4
  • Heval M. Kelli
    • 5
  • Sanjit Misra
    • 6
  • Michael J. Blaha
    • 7
  • Seth S. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins HospitalJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins HospitalJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Division of CardiologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research InstituteEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  6. 6.Stanford Health CareStanfordUSA
  7. 7.Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins HospitalJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations