Advertisement

Use of Telemedicine and Helicopter Transport to Improve Stroke Care in Remote Locations

  • Mihaela Saler
  • Jeffrey A. Switzer
  • David C. HessEmail author
Cerebrovascular Disease and Stroke

Opinion statement

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is the only medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of acute stoke. Despite established efficacy, less than 3% of stroke patients receive treatment, and that number is even smaller for patients living in remote locations. This is in part due to a lack of neurologists and stroke specialists in these rural communities. The traditional model of “ship and drip” wastes crucial time, resulting in delays or loss of treatment. In this review, we discuss strategies to overcome geographic disparities in stroke care and improve acute treatment in remote locations. Helicopter transport from field to stroke center is one option to rapidly deliver patients to stroke centers. However, geography, weather, and unnecessary transport are potential drawbacks. Alternatively, “telestroke” facilitates remote evaluation of acute stroke patients via an audiovisual link and transmission of computerized tomography images. Despite the physical separation, stroke specialists are able to examine patients, review brain imaging and make correct treatment decisions; transfer to a stroke center can then be performed as appropriate. A cost-benefit analysis of telestroke is needed, although the recent proliferation of telestroke networks suggests an economic asset to some hospital systems.

Keywords

Acute Stroke Emergency Medical Service Stroke Care Stroke Center Basilar Artery Occlusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Disclosure

Mihaela Saler and Jeffrey A. Switzer and have no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article. David C. Hess is a cofounder of REACH CALL, Inc, has founder’s equity in REACH CALL, Inc, and is on the Board of Directors of REACH CALL, Inc.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update; a report from the American heart association statistics committee to stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113(6):e85–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States 1999 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 50(7):120–125Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care. A policy statement from the American heart association. Stroke. 2009;40:2635–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown DL, Boden-Albala B, Langa KM, et al. Projected costs of ischemic stroke in the United States. Neurology. 2006;67:1390–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. ECASS investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Del Zoppo GJ, Saver JL, Jauch EC, et al. Expansion of the time window for treatment of acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: a science advisory from the American heart association/American stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40(8):2945–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleindofer D, Xu Y, Moomav CJ. US geographic distribution of rt-PA utilization by hospital for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:3580–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bambauer KZ, Johnston SC, Bambauer DE, et al. Reasons why few patients with acute stroke receive tissue plasminogen activator. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(5):661–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    CASPR. Prioritizing interventions to improve rates of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:654–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradley WG. Neurology in the next two decades: report of the workforce task force of the American academy of neurology. Neurology. 2000;54(4):787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Switzer JA, Levine SR, Hess DC. Telestroke 10 years later- ‘telestroke 2.0’. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28:323–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Census 2000 Population statistics. Available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census. Accessed November 2010
  14. 14.
    Eberhardt MS, Pamuk ER. The importance of place of residence: examining health in rural and nonrural areas. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1682–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leira EC, Pary JK, Davis PH, et al. Slow progressive acceptance of intravenous thrombolysis for patients with stroke by rural primary care physicians. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:518–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leira EC, Hess DC, Torner JC, et al. Rural-urban differences in acute stroke management practices. A modifiable disparity. Arch Neurol. 2008;56(7):887–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alberts MJ, Hademenos G, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain attack coallition. JAMA. 2000;283(23):3102–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Facts about Primary Stroke Center Certification. Available at http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18Primary_Stroke_Certification.Pdf. Accessed November 2010
  19. 19.
    Albright KC, Branas CC, Meyer BC, et al. Acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(10):1210–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Switzer JA, Hess DC. Development of regional programs to speed treatment of stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8:35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frey JL, Jahnke HK, Goslar PW, et al. tPA by telephone: extending the benefits of a comprehensive stroke center. Neurology. 2005;64:154–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merino JG, Silver B, Wong E, et al. Extending tissue plasminogen activator use to community and rural stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:141–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an update pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9727):1695–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nedeltchev K, Arnold M, Brekenfeld C, et al. Pre- and in-hospital delays from stroke onset to intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke. 2003;34:1230–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silliman SL, Quinn B, Huggett V, et al. Use of a field-to stroke center helicopter transport program to extend thrombolytic therapy to rural residents. Stroke. 2003;34:729–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silbergleit R, Scott PA, Lowell MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of helicopter transport of stroke patients for thrombolysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:966–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leira EC, Lamb DL, Nugent AS, et al. Feasibility of acute clinical trials during aerial interhospital transfer. Stroke. 2006;37:2504–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leira EC, Ahmed A, Lamb DL, et al. Extending acute trials to remote populations. A pilot study during interhospital helicopter transfer. Stroke. 2009;40:895–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, et al. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2009;40:2616–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levine SR, Gorman M. “Telestroke”: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:464–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shafqat S, Kvedar JC, Guanci M, et al. Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability of remote administration of the NIH stroke scale. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2141–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Handschu R, Littmann R, Reulbach U, et al. Telemedicine in emergency evaluation of acute stroke: interrater agreement in remote video examination with a novel multimedia system. Stroke. 2003;34(12):2842–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang S, Lee SB, Pardue C, et al. Reliability of national institutes of health stroke scale via telestroke. Stroke. 2003;34:e188–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meyer BC, Lyden PD, Al-Khoury L, et al. Prospective reliability of the STRokE DOC wireless/site independent telemedicine system. Neurology. 2005;64(6):1058–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    LaMonte MP, Bahouth MN, Hu P, et al. Telemedicine for acute stroke. Triumphs and pitfalls. Stroke. 2003;34:725–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A, et al. Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(11):1193–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Audebert HJ, Kukla C, von Claranau SC, et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke. 2005;36(2):287–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, et al. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona. The initial mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke. 2010;41:1251–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hess DC, Wang S, Hamilton W, et al. REACH. Clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke. 2005;36:2018–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang S, Gross H, Lee SB, et al. Remote evaluation of acute stroke in rural community hospitals in Georgia. Stroke. 2004;35:1763–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Switzer JA, Hall C, Gross H, et al. A web-based telestroke system facilitates rapid treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients in rural emergency departments. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(1):12–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:742–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moskowitz A, Chan YF, Bruns J, et al. Emergency physician and stroke specialist beliefs and expectations regarding telestroke. Stroke. 2010;41:805–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pfefferkorn T, Holtmanssoptter M, Schmidt C, et al. Drips, ship and retrieve. Cooperative recanalization therapy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Stroke. 2010;41:722–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Elkins JS, Khatabi T, Fung L, et al. Recruiting subjects for acute stroke trials: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2006;37(1):123–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Switzer JA, Hall CE, Close B, et al. A telestroke network enhances recruitment into acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2010;41:566–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trail: a randomized, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(9):787–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weintraub MI. Thrombolysis (tissue plasminogen activator) in stroke: a medicolegal quagmire. Stroke. 2006;37(7):1917–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaela Saler
    • 1
  • Jeffrey A. Switzer
    • 1
  • David C. Hess
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyGeorgia Health Sciences UniversityAugustaUSA

Personalised recommendations