Transmyocardial laser revascularization
- 29 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Opinion statement
Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) has been performed on over 12,000 patients worldwide. Since 1990, the treatment has provided significant angina relief for symptomatic end-stage coronary disease that is refractory to medical therapy. Seventy-five percent of patients treated with TMR have demonstrated a decrease of two or more angina classes postoperatively. As a result, TMR has provided a significant improvement in quality of life for patients, resulting in fewer hospital admissions and decreased dependency on medications. Two different wavelengths of light, carbon dioxide (CO2) and holmium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG), have been employed. Results obtained using these lasers differ. The CO2 laser has demonstrated a perfusion benefit as well as long-term improvement in quality of life and angina relief. The Ho:YAG laser has not demonstrated these results. These differences may, in part, explain the failure of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization. This catheterbased approach was not as successful as TMR due to its partial thickness treatment of the myocardium as well as its use of the Ho:YAG laser. In addition to the patients with end-stage coronary disease who undergo TMR as sole therapy, there are an increasing number of patients who have been treated with a combination of coronary artery bypass grafting and TMR. This provides a more complete revascularization than leaving territories ungrafted. Further enhancement of the angiogenic response seen after TMR may be seen by the addition of gene therapy to TMR treatment.
Keywords
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Holmium Sole Therapy Laser Revascularization Transmyocardial LaserPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 1.Mirhoseini M, Muckerheide M, Cayton MM: Transventricular revascularization by laser. Lasers Surg Med 1982, 2:187–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Mirhoseini M, Fisher JC, Cayton M: Myocardial revascularization by laser: a clinical report. Lasers Surg Med 1983, 3:241–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Okada M, Ikuta H, Shimizu OK, et al.: Alternative method of myocardial revascularization by laser: experimental and clinical study. Kobe J Med Sci 1986, 32:151–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Okada M, Shimizu K, Ikuta H, et al.: A new method of myocardial revascularization by laser. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991, 39:1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Horvath KA, Mannting F, Cummings N, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization: operative techniques and clinical results at two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 111:1047–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Kadipasaoglu KA, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization: clinical experience with twelve-month follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 111:791–797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Horvath KA, Cohn LC, Cooley DA, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization: results of a multicenter trial using TLR as sole therapy for end stage coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997, 113:645–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Krabatsch T, Tambeur L, Lieback E, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization in the treatment of endstage coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998, 4:64–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hattler BG, Griffith BP, Zenati MA, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization in the patient with unmanageable unstable angina. Ann Thorac Surg 1999, 68:1203–1209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Milano A, Pratali S, Tartarini G, et al.: Early results of transmyocardial revascularization with a holmium laser. Ann Thorac Surg 1998, 65:700–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dowling RD, Petracek MR, Selinger SL, Allen KB: Transmyocardial revascularization in patients with refractory, unstable angina. Circulation 1998, 98(supp 2):II73-II75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Allen KB, Dowling RD, Fudge TL, et al.: Comparison of transmyocardial revascularization with medical therapy in patients with refractory angina. N Engl J Med 1999, 341:1029–1036. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of Ho:YAG TMR versus medical therapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Burkhoff D, Schmidt S, Schulman SP, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomized trial. Lancet 1999, 354:885–890. With reference [12], this provided the results that led to FDA approval.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jones JW, Schmidt SE, Richman BW, et al.: Holmium: YAG laser transmyocardial revascularization relieves angina and improves functional status. Ann Thorac Surg 1999, 67:1596–1602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Frazier OH, March RJ, Horvath KA: Transmyocardial revascularization with a carbon dioxide laser in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1999, 341:1021–1028. Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of CO2 TMR versus medical therapy. Basis for FDA approval. Demonstrated perfusion benefit from TMR.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schofield PM, Sharples LD, Caine N, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999, 353:519–524. Single institution, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of CO2 TMR versus medical therapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Aaberge L, Nordstrand K, Dragsund M, et al.: Transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Clinical results from the Norwegian randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 35:1170–1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Agarwal R, Ajit M, Kurian VM, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization: early results and 1-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 69:1993–1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Horvath KA: Results of prospective randomized controlled trials of transmyocardial laser revascularization. Heart Surg Forum 2002, 5:33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.De Carlo M, Milano AD, Pratali S, et al.: Symptomatic improvement after transmyocardial laser revascularization: how long does it last? Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 70:1130–1133. Loss of angina relief 3 years after Ho:YAG TMR.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schneider J, Diegeler A, Krakor R, et al.: Transmyocardial laser revascularization with the holmium:YAG laser: loss of symptomatic improvement after 2 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001, 19:164–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Horvath KA, Aranki SF, Cohn LH, et al.: Sustained angina relief 5 years after transmyocardial laser revascularization with a CO2 laser. Circulation 2001, 104(suppl 1):I81-I84. Long-term angina relief and improved quality of life after CO2 laser.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Aaberge L, Rootwelt K, Blomhoff S, et al.: Continued symptomatic improvement three to five years after transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39:1588–1593. Long-term follow-up on CO2 TMR and medical management. Medical therapy led to worsening symptoms and more unstable angina over time. CO2 TMR presented both.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kadipasaoglu KA, Sartori M, Masai T, et al.: Intraoperative arrhythmias and tissue damage during transmyocardial laser revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1999, 67:423–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sayeed-Shah U, Mann MJ, Martin J, et al.: Complete reversal of ischemic wall motion abnormalities by combined use of gene therapy with transmyocardial laser revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998, 116:763–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Doukas J, Ma CL, Craig D: Therapeutic angiogenesis induced by FGF-2 gene delivery combined with laser transmyocardial revascularization. Circulation 2000, 102:1214.Google Scholar
- 27.Lutter G, Dern P, Attmann T, et al.: Combined use of transmyocardial laser revascularization with basic fibroblastic growth factor in chronically ischemic porcine hearts. Circulation 2000, 102:3693.Google Scholar
- 28.Horvath KA, Doukas J, Lu CJ, et al.: Myocardial functional recovery after FGF2 gene therapy as assessed by echocardiography and MRI. Ann Thorac Surg 2002, 74:481–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar