Advertisement

Depression, hostility, and social isolation in patients with coronary artery disease

  • James L. Januzzi
  • Richard C. Pasternak
Article

Opinion statement

Psychosocial risk factors such as depression, hostility, and social isolation are substantially more prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) than is widely recognized. It has been demonstrated that patients with CAD who have these risk factors, individually or together, may have a substantially increased risk for recurrent ischemic events, as well as cardiac death, when compared with unaffected CAD patients. Numerous adverse physiologic changes that appear to occur as a consequence of these psychosocial risk factors have been identified, including increased platelet aggregation, hyperadrenergic states, elevated cortisol levels, abnormal endothelial function, and an increased propensity towards malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Each of these may explain the increased risk of recurrent coronary events (including death) among afflicted patients.

Under-recognition, and hence under-treatment, remains a principal obstacle for improvements in the care of patients with CAD who have psychosocial risk factors. The diagnosis of psychosocial risk factors depends on systematic patient evaluation by experienced clinicians trained in the recognition of these disorders. All clinicians must be aware of the potential importance of these factors, their sometimes subtle presenting characteristics, and the available treatment options. The universal use of comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation offers the ideal conduit for such evaluation and management.

Nonpharmacologic therapies for psychosocial risk factors include psychotherapy, stress-reduction techniques, and exercise therapy. Studies suggest that the reduction of social isolation among depressed patients with CAD may result in a reduced mortality rate in comparison with those without improvements in isolation. Pharmacologic therapies are mainly for the management of depression, and largely center on the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Several SSRIs (paroxetine and sertraline) recently have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of depression in patients with ischemic heart disease. Whether use of antidepressants attenuate the increased cardiac risk from depression in the setting CAD remains to be proven; however, their use improves the quality of life in properly selected patients.

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease Paroxetine Sertraline Social Isolation Bupropion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Januzzi JL, Stern TA, Pasternak RC, DeSanctis RW: The influence of anxiety and depression on outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160:1913–1921. A comprehensive review of two common psychosocial risk factors among patients with CAD and their effects on outcomes. Includes an extensive list of references.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J: Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation 1999, 99:2192–2217. A well-written summary of both experimental and clinical data supporting the link between psychosocial risk factors and CAD.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M: Depression following myocardial infarction. Impact on 6-month survival. JAMA 1993, 270:1819–1825. A landmark paper demonstrating that depression is not only common following acute MI, but is associated with a fourfold increase in mortality.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M: Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995, 91:999–1005. The follow-up of Frasure-Smith et al.’s original study [3], which demonstrates a persistently negative effect from depression on the prognosis of patients with CAD over 18 months of follow-up.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Juneau M, Theroux P: Depression and 1-year prognosis in unstable angina. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160:1354–1360. A recent published study that suggests that the risk of depression not only extends to patients with acute MI, but also to those with unstable angina pectoris as well.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al.: The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989, 262:914–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wells KB, Burnam MA, Rogers W, et al.: The course of depression in adult outpatients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992, 49:788–794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barefoot JC, Schroll M: Symptoms of depression, acute myocardial infarction, and total mortality in a community sample. Circulation 1996, 93:1976–1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donker FJ, Breteler MH, vander Staak CP: Assessment of hostility in patients with coronary heart disease. J Pers Assess 2000, 75:158–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keltikangas-Jarvinen L, Raikkonen K, Hautanen A, Adlercreutz H: Vital exhaustion, anger expression, and pituitary and adrenocortical hormones. Implications for the insulin resistance syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996, 16:275–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Markovitz JH: Hostility is associated with increased platelet activation in coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med 1998, 60:586–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niaura R, Banks SM, Ward KD, et al.: Hostility and the metabolic syndrome in older males: the normative aging study. Psychosom Med 2000, 62:7–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richards JC, Hof A, Alvarenga M: Serum lipids and their relationships with hostility and angry affect and behaviors in men. Health Psychol 2000, 19:393–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suarez EC, Bates MP, Harralson TL: The relation of hostility to lipids and lipoproteins in women: evidence for the role of antagonistic hostility. Ann Behav Med 1998, 20:59–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scherwitz LW, Perkins LL, Chesney MA, et al.: Hostility and health behaviors in young adults: the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Am J Epidemiol 1992, 136:136–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horowitz RI: Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1992, 117:1003–1009. A landmark study demonstrating a significant increase in mortality among socially isolated elderly patients.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brummett BH, Babyak MA, Barefoot JC, et al.: Social support and hostility as predictors of depressive symptoms in cardiac patients one month after hospitalization: a prospective study. Psychosom Med 1998, 60:707–713.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knox SS, Siegmund KD, Weidner G, et al.: Hostility, social support, and coronary heart disease in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 1998, 82:1192–1196. A well-designed study examining the effects of hostility and social isolation on the development of CAD.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orth-Gomer K, Unden AL, Edwards ME: Social isolation and mortality in ischemic heart disease. A 10-year follow-up study of 150 middle-aged men. Acta Med Scand 1988, 224:205–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorman JM, Sloan RP: Heart rate variability in depressive and anxiety disorders. Am Heart J 2000, 140(4 suppl):77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donker FJ: Cardiac rehabilitation: a review of current developments. Clin Psychol Rev 2000, 20:923–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lavie CJ, Milani RV: Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs on coronary patients with high levels of hostility. Mayo Clin Proc 1999, 74:959–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blumenthal JA, Wei J: Psychobehavioral treatment in cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiol Clin 1993, 11:323–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams RB, Littman AB: Psychosocial factors: role in cardiac risk and treatment strategies. Cardiol Clin 1996, 14:97–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD): study design and methods. The ENRICHD investigators. Am Heart J 2000, 139:1–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Prince RH, et al.: Randomised trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction. Lancet 1997, 350:473–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Gravel G, et al.: Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000, 101:1919–1924. An important article that suggests that high levels of social support are associated with an attenuation in the risk from depression and CAD.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adams, PB, Lawson S, Sanigorski A, Sinclair AJ: Arachidonic acid to eicosapentaenoic acid ratio in blood correlates positively with clinical symptoms of depression. Lipids 1996, 31(suppl):S157–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roose SP, Laghrissi-Thode F, Kennedy JS, et al.: Comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. JAMA 1998, 279:287–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shapiro PA, Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, et al.: An open-label preliminary trial of sertraline for treatment of major depression after acute myocardial infarction (the SADHAT Trial). Sertraline Anti-Depressant Heart Attack Trial. Am Heart J 1999 137:1100–1106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    qRx: Electronic Pharmacopeia, version 4.0 [computer software]. San Francisco: Epocrates, Inc; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Januzzi
    • 1
  • Richard C. Pasternak
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiology DivisionDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations