The Role of Urodynamics in the Pre-transplant Evaluation of Renal Transplant

  • Temitope Rude
  • Nima Nassiri
  • Aurash Naser-Tavakolian
  • David GinsbergEmail author
Female Urology (L Cox, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Female Urology


Purpose of Review

The goal of this study is to delineate the role of advanced urologic evaluation with urodynamics prior to renal transplantation. We seek to report on its indications, possible findings, and subsequent treatment pathways.

Recent Findings

This body of literature is largely comprised of retrospective, single-site studies. Patient selection for urodynamics can be determined based on patient history and voiding symptoms. Many of these renal transplant patients have urodynamic abnormalities such as decreased bladder capacity and compliance. Appropriate treatment of these abnormalities allows for average rates of graft survival.


Urodynamic evaluation is not needed in every renal transplant recipient. However, in patients with oliguria or bladder dysfunction, urodynamics can often reveal significant pathology. The well-selected patient with lower urinary tract symptoms may also benefit from urodynamic evaluation. Treatment options are widely variable, from observation to reconstructive surgery, and should be based on the patient and urodynamic findings.


Renal transplant Urodynamics End-stage renal disease 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Temitope Rude, Nima Nassiri, Aurash Naser-Tavakolian, and David Ginsberg each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    • Antoniewicz AA, Zapala L, Bogucki A, Malecki R. The standard of urological consultation of patients qualified for renal transplant - a review. Central European journal of urology. 2015;68(3):376–82 This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the current literature regarding urologic evaluation prior to renal transplantation. This is an excellent resource for the numerous factors to take into account, including oncologic concerns and management of the native kidney, in addition to functional considerations. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cairns HS, Leaker B, Woodhouse CR, Rudge CJ, Neild GH. Renal transplantation into abnormal lower urinary tract. Lancet (London, England). 1991;338(8779):1376–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sackett DD, Singh P, Lallas CD. Urological involvement in renal transplantation. Int J Urol. 2011;18(3):185–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Power RE, Hickey DP, Little DM. Urological evaluation prior to renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(10):2962–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singer JS, Zaid U, Gritsch HA, Lerman SE, Churchill BM. Selective use of voiding cystourethrography in children undergoing renal transplant evaluation. J Urol. 2009;182(3):1158–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glazier DB, Whang MI, Geffner SR, Lyman NW, Friedman GS, Viscuso R, et al. Evaluation of voiding cystourethrography prior to renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1996;62(12):1762–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalble T, Lucan M, Nicita G, Sells R, Burgos Revilla FJ. Wiesel M. EAU guidelines on renal transplantation. Eur Urol. 2005;47(2):156–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nitti VW, Brucker BM. Urodynamic and Video-urodynamic evaluation of the lower urinary tract. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh urology. 11th ed: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1718–42.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, Herndon CD, Kobashi KC, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2464–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dorsher PT, McIntosh PM. Neurogenic bladder. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:816274.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Errando C, Batista JE, Caparros J, Arano P, Villavicencio H. Is bladder cycling useful in the urodynamic evaluation previous to renal transplantation? Urol Int. 2005;74(4):341–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zermann DH, Loffler U, Reichelt O, Wunderlich H, Wilhelm S, Schubert J. Bladder dysfunction and end stage renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(1):93–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsunoyama K, Ishida H, Omoto K, Shimizu T, Shirakawa H, Tanabe K. Bladder function of end-stage renal disease patients. Int J Urol. 2010;17(9):791–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zachoval R, Borovicka V, Marada T, Viklicky O, Fronek J, Krhut J, et al. The effects of diuresis, duration of dialysis and age on lower urinary tract function in urologically healthy male patients on the waiting list for kidney transplant. Urol J. 2018;15(2):49–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kashi SH, Wynne KS, Sadek SA, Lodge JP. An evaluation of vesical urodynamics before renal transplantation and its effect on renal allograft function and survival. Transplantation. 1994;57(10):1455–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen JL, Lee MC, Kuo HC. Reduction of cystometric bladder capacity and bladder compliance with time in patients with end-stage renal disease. JFMA = Taiwan yi zhi. 2012;111(4):209–13.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turunc T, Micozkadioglu H, Dirim A, Kuzgunbay B, Aygun C, Ozkardes H, et al. Evaluation of video-urodynamic studies before renal transplantation in chronic renal failure patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(4):903–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Concodora CW, Reddy PP, VanderBrink BA. The role of video urodynamics in the management of the valve bladder. Current urology reports. 2017;18(3):24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Penna FJ, Elder JS. CKD and bladder problems in children. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2011;18(5):362–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ansari MS, Nunia SK, Bansal A, Singh P, Sekhon V, Singh D, et al. Bladder contractility index in posterior urethral valve: a new marker for early prediction of progression to renal failure. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(2):162.e1–5.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ouyang L, Bolen J, Valdez R, Joseph D, Baum MA, Thibadeau J. Characteristics and survival of patients with end stage renal disease and spina bifida in the United States renal data system. J Urol. 2015;193(2):558–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Theodorou C, Katsifotis C, Bocos J, Moutzouris G, Stournaras P, Kostakis A. Urodynamics prior to renal transplantation--its impact on treatment decision and final results. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(4):335–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu YJ, Veale JL, Gritsch HA. Urological complications of renal transplant in patients with prolonged anuria. Transplantation. 2008;86(9):1196–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Inoue T, Satoh S, Obara T, Saito M, Numakura K, Narita S, et al. Cystometric evaluation of recovery in hypocompliant defunctionalized bladder as a result of long-term dialysis after kidney transplantation. Int J Urol. 2016;23(8):694–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Silva DM, Prudente AC, Mazzali M, Borges CF, D’Ancona C. Bladder function evaluation before renal transplantation in nonurologic disease: is it necessary? Urology. 2014;83(2):406–10 The authors present prospective data regarding the changes in urodynamic parameters with return in diuresis. This provides the foundation for the option of observation for the well-selected pre-transplant patient with abnormal urodynamic findings. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salman B, Hassan A, Sultan S, Tophill P, Halawa A. Renal transplant in the abnormal bladder: long-term follow-up. experimental and clinical transplantation. official journal of the Middle ECT. 2018;16(1):10–5.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dorfman B, Yussim A, Gillon G, Shmuely D, Shaharabani E, Bar-Nathan N, et al. Conservative approach to lower urinary tract abnormalities in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1997;29(1–2):143–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Errando C, Batista JE, Caparros J, Vicente J, Arano P. Urodynamic evaluation and management prior to renal transplantation. Eur Urol. 2000;38(4):415–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Serrano DP, Flechner SM, Modlin CS, Wyner LM, Novick AC. Transplantation into the long-term defunctionalized bladder. J Urol. 1996;156(3):885–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karam G, Giessing M. Bladder dysfunction following renal transplantation is it predictable? Transplant Proc. 2011;43(1):387–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luke PP, Herz DB, Bellinger MF, Chakrabarti P, Vivas CA, Scantlebury VP, et al. Long-term results of pediatric renal transplantation into a dysfunctional lower urinary tract. Transplantation. 2003;76(11):1578–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaplan SA. AUA guidelines and their impact on the management of BPH: an update. Rev Urol. 2004;6(Suppl 9):S46–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, Sievert KD, Thompson C, Lam W, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2131–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lubetzky M, Ajaimy M, Kamal L, de Boccardo G, Akalin E, Kayler L. Kidney transplant complications from undiagnosed benign prostatic hypertrophy. Clin Transpl. 2015;29(6):539–42.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsaur I, Jones J, Melamed RJ, Blaheta RA, Gossmann J, Bentas W. Postoperative voiding dysfunction in older male renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2009;41(5):1615–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pereira PL, Urrutia MJ, Lobato R, Jaureguizar E. Renal transplantation in augmented bladders. Current urology reports. 2014;15(8):431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Churchill BM, Sheldon CA, McLorie GA, Arbus GS. Factors influencing patient and graft survival in 300 cadaveric pediatric renal transplants. J Urol. 1988;140(5 Pt 2):1129–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E, Antonopoulos I, David-Neto E, Ianhez LE, Sabbaga E, et al. Kidney transplantation in patients with bladder augmentation: surgical outcome and urodynamic follow-up. Transplant Proc. 1997;29(1–2):157–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zaragoza MR, Ritchey ML, Bloom DA, McGuire EJ. Enterocystoplasty in renal transplantation candidates: urodynamic evaluation and outcome. J Urol. 1993;150(5 Pt 1):1463–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Capozza N, Torino G, Collura G, Battaglia S, Guzzo I, Caione P, et al. Renal transplantation in patients with “valve bladder”: is bladder augmentation necessary? Transplant Proc. 2010;42(4):1069–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koo HP, Bunchman TE, Flynn JT, Punch JD, Schwartz AC, Bloom DA. Renal transplantation in children with severe lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol. 1999;161(1):240–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Riley P, Marks SD, Desai DY, Mushtaq I, Koffman G, Mamode N. Challenges facing renal transplantation in pediatric patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Transplantation. 2010;89(11):1299–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kamal MM, El-Hefnawy AS, Soliman S, Shokeir AA, Ghoneim MA. Impact of posterior urethral valves on pediatric renal transplantation: a single-center comparative study of 297 cases. Pediatr Transplant. 2011;15(5):482–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lopez Pereira P, Jaureguizar E, Martinez Urrutia MJ, Meseguer C, Navarro M. Does treatment of bladder dysfunction prior to renal transplant improve outcome in patients with posterior urethral valves? Pediatr Transplant. 2000;4(2):118–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Temitope Rude
    • 1
  • Nima Nassiri
    • 1
  • Aurash Naser-Tavakolian
    • 1
  • David Ginsberg
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations