Robotic Autotransplantation and Management of Post-transplant Anastomotic Strictures: the Future Is Here

  • Tad Kroczak
  • Luke F. Reynolds
  • Michael OrdonEmail author
Endourology (P Mucksavage, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Endourology


Purpose of Review

We set out to review the current published experience with robotic autotransplantation. Although the experience to date is limited, this surgery appears to be safe and technically feasible. We also examined the use of the robotic surgical platform for the management of post-transplant uretero-vesical anastomotic strictures.

Recent Findings

To date, only four reported cases of robotic autotransplantation have been described with two being performed completely intra-corporeally. An intra-corporeal approach is feasible for benign conditions, while malignant masses should be inspected and dissected extra-corporeally. Ureteric strictures after renal transplantation are common. To date, the experience with robotic surgical management is limited but has also been shown to be safe and feasible.


While robotic autotransplantation is still in its infancy, it is feasible and appears to be safe. Renal allograft function and surgical outcomes are favorable and provide patients the option to have a historically more morbid surgery performed with a minimally invasive approach.


Robotic surgery Autotransplantation Robotic renal transplantation 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Tad Kroczak, Luke F. Reynolds, and Michael Ordon each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Hardy JD. High ureteral injuries: management by autotransplantation of the kidney. JAMA. 1963;184(2):97–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McLoughlin MG, Williams GM, Stonesifer GL. Ex vivo surgical dissection: autotransplantation in renal disease. JAMA. 1976;235:1705–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M, Kher V, Ghosh P, Abaza R, et al. Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):991–1000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oberholzer J, Giulianotti P, Danielson KK, Spaggiari M, Bejarano-Pineda L, Bianco F, et al. Minimally invasive robotic kidney transplantation for obese patients previously denied access to transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(3):721–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doumerc N, Roumiguié M, Rischmann P, Sallusto F. Totally robotic approach with transvaginal insertion for kidney transplantation. Eur Urol. 2015;68(6):1103–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azhar B, Patel S, Chadha P, Hakim N. Indications for renal autotransplant: an overview. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13(2):109–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tran G, Ramaswamy K, Chi T, Meng M, Freise C, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation: safety, efficacy and long-term durability. J Urol. 2015;194(3):738–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R: Completely intracorporeal robotic autotransplantation. J Urol. 2014; 192(5): 1516–22. The first published report of a completely intracorporeal robotic autotransplantation. This landmark report demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic assisted ReATx. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    • Lee JY, Alzahrani T, Ordon M: Intra-corporeal robotic renal auto-transplantation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 9(9–10): E748–9. The first Canadian and second published report of completely intracorporeal robotic autotransplantation. The described technique was modified to minimize renal ischemia previously encountered by Abaza and colleagues. This was accomplished by performing the pelvic vessel dissection prior to the nephrectomy. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sood A, Jeong W, Ahlawat R, Abdollah F, Sammon JD, Bhandari M, et al. Minimally invasive renal autotransplantation. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):717–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Araki M, Wada K, Mitsui Y, Sadahira T, Kubota R, Nishimura S, et al. Robotic renal autotransplantation: first case outside of North America. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71(4):351–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whang M, Geffner S, Baimeedi S, Bonomini L, Mulgaonkar S. Urologic complications in over 1000 kidney transplants performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1375–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benoit G, Alexander L, Moukarzel M, et al. Percutaneous antegrade dilation of ureteral strictures in kidney transplants. J Urol. 1993;150:37–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Streem SB, Novick AC, Steinmuller DR, Zelch MG, Risius B, Geisinger MA. Long-term efficacy of ureteral dilation for transplant ureteral stenosis. J Urol. 1988;140:32–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giessing M. Transplant ureter stricture following renal transplantation: surgical options. Transplant Proc. 2011;43:383–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.A. Shoskes, D. Hanbury, Cranston PJ, Morris Urological complications in 1,000 consecutive renal transplant recipients J Urol, 153 (1995), pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bachar GN, Mor E, Bartal G, Atar E, Goldberg N, Belenky A. Percutaneous balloon dilatation for the treatment of early and late ureteral strictures after renal transplantation: long-term follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004;27:335–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kristo B, Phelan MW, Gritsch HA, Schulam PG. Treatment of renal transplant ureterovesical anastomotic strictures using antegrade balloon dilation with or without holmium: YAG laser endoureterotomy. Urology. 2003;62:831–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kroczak T, Koulack J, Mc Gregor T. Management of Complicated Ureteric Strictures After Renal Transplantation: Case Series of Pyelovesicostomy With Boari Flap. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(6):1850–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kozinn SI, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A. Robotic versus open distal ureteral reconstruction and reimplantation for benign stricture disease. J Endourol. 2012;26:147–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glinianski M, Guru KA, Zimmerman G, Mohler J, Kim HL. Robot-assisted ureterectomy and ureteral reconstruction for urothelial carcinoma. J Endourol. 2009;23:97–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee DI, Schwab CW, Harris A. Robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy in the adult: initial clinical series. Urology. 2010;75(3):570–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Musch M, Hohenhorst L, Pailliart A, Loewen H, Davoudi Y, Kroepfl D. Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients. BJU Int. 2013;111:773–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Shalhav AL, Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, Galocy RM, et al. Case report: robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy in a transplanted kidney with ureteral stricture. J Endourol. 2006;20:31–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Hauser, J. Schwartz, S. Tran, C. Iselin. Robotic assisted uretero-ureteral (receiver-donor) anastomosis. Eur Urol Suppl, 11 (2012), p. eV42.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benamran DA, Klein J, Hadaya K, Wirth GJ, Martin PY, Iselin CE. Post-kidney transplant robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral (donor-receiver) anastomosis for kidney graft reflux or stricture disease. Urology. 2017;108:96–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Michael’s Hospital, Division of Urology, Department of SurgeryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations