Current Urology Reports

, 15:444 | Cite as

The Evaluation and Management of Refractory Neurogenic Overactive Bladder

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (H Goldman and G Badlani, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction

Abstract

Patients with neurologic disease commonly develop overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms of urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence that remain bothersome despite oral pharmacologic therapy. Management of refractory OAB in the neurogenic population is a complex issue with no uniform treatment strategy. When treatment fails or patients generally are dissatisfied with the adverse effects of oral therapy, available options include sacral neuromodulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), botulinum toxin injections, and lower urinary tract reconstruction such as augmentation cystoplasty. A thorough knowledge and understanding of available and emerging treatment options for neurogenic detrusor overactivity is paramount to assisting clinicians in choosing an appropriate treatment. This article reviews the non-pharmacologic treatment options for neurogenic OAB, mainly botulinum toxin, neuromodulation, and lower urinary tract reconstruction, and discusses important relevant studies.

Keywords

Neurogenic bladder Neurogenic detrusor overactivity Spinal cord injury Botulinum toxin Neuromodulation Lower urinary tract reconstruction 

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Raj Kurpad declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Dr. Michael J. Kennelly reports grants and personal fees from Allergan, Medtronic, and Uroplasty, as well as grants from Hollister, Coloplast, and Bard.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.•
    Abrams P. Describing bladder storage function: overactive bladder syndrome and detrusor over-activity. Urology. 2003;62(Suppl):28. An excellent review of the pathophysiology of micturition. Additionally, this article provides an informative overview of overactive bladder.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth International consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:213–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cruz F, Siva C. Refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:22–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.•
    Wein AJ. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in neurologic injury and disease. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. New York: Saunders; 2007. p. 2011–45. The definitive standard and authority on defining, detailing, and presenting the evaluation and management of neurogenic bladder.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linsenmeyer TA, Linsenmeyer MA. Impact of annual urodynamic evaluations on guiding bladder management in individuals with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(5):420–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larijani FJ, Moghtaderi M, Hajizadeh N, Assadi F. Preventing kidney injury in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(12):1359–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.•
    Kennelly MJ, Devoe WB. Overactive bladder: pharmacologic treatments in the neurogenic population. Rev Urol. 2008;10(3):182–91. An excellent overview of the medical therapies available for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The authors also offer a broad outline of additional further therapies.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sahai A, Cortes E, Seth J, Khan MS, Panicker J, Kelleher C, et al. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity in patients with spinal cord injury: evaluation and management. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(6):404–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albanese A. Terminology for preparations of botulinum neurotoxins: what a difference a name makes. JAMA. 2011;305(1):89–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.•
    Linsenmeyer TA. Use of botulinum toxin in individuals with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: state of the art review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(5):402–19. A state-of-the-art review that provides excellent insight into the mechanism of action, as well as a review of the most current evidence available to support the use of botulinum toxin in the management of refractory neurogenic bladder.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grosse J, Kramer G, Stöhrer M. Success of repeat detrusor injections of botulinum A toxin in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;47(5):653–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schurch B, Stöhrer M, Kramer G, Schmid DM, Gaul G, Hauri D. Botulinum-A toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 1):692–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gamé X, Castel-Lacanal E, Bentaleb Y, Thiry-Escudié I, DeBoissezon X, Malavaud B, et al. Botulinum toxin A detrusor injections in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity significantly decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections. Eur Urol. 2008;53(3):613–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Del Zingaro M, Porena M. Six-year follow-up of botulinum toxin A intradetrusotial injections in patients with refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity: clinical and urodynamic results. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):705–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carlson JJ, Hansen RN, Dmochowski RR, Globe DR, Colayco DC, Sullivan SD. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in the United States. Clin Ther. 2013;35(4):414–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennelly M, Dmochowski R, Ethans K, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of onabotulinum toxin A in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenicdetrusor overactivity: an interim analysis. Urology. 2013;81(3):491–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson RU, Orenberg EK, Glowe P. Onabotulinum toxin A office treatment for neurogenic bladder incontinence in Parkinson's disease. Urology. 2014;83(1):22–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chancellor MB, Patel V, Leng WW, Shenot PJ, Lam W, Globe DR, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neurology. 2013;81(9):841–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sussman D, Patel V, Del Popolo G, Lam W, Globe D, Pommerville P. Treatment satisfaction and improvement in health-related quality of life with onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(3):242–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. In: Watson T, editor. Electrotherapy: evidence-based practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 253–96.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chancellor MB, Chartier-Kastler EJ. Neuromodulation. 2000;3(1):16–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leng WW, Morrisroe SN. Urol Clin N Am. 2006;33:491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amundsen CL, Romero AA, Jamison MG, Webster GD. Sacral neuromodulation for intractable urge incontinence: are there factors associated with cure? Urology. 2005;66:746–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Medtronic. MRI guidelines for InterStimTherapy neurostimulation systems [online], http://manuals.medtronic.com/wcm/groups/mdtcom_sg/@emanuals/@era/@neuro/documents/documents/contrib_119885.pdf (2012).
  26. 26.•
    Bartley J, Gilleran J, Peters K. Neuromodulation for overactive bladder. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(9):513–21. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.143. A detailed review of the mechanism of action and a review of the current literature regarding the various modalities of neuromodulation that may be used in the management of refractory neurogenic bladder.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peters KM, Kandagatla P, Killinger KA, Wolfert C, Boura JA. Clinical outcomes of sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurologic conditions. Urology. 2013;81(4):738–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lombardi G, Musco S, Celso M, Del Corso F, Del Popolo G. Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention in incomplete spinal cord patients: a ten-year follow-up single-centre experience. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amarenco G et al. Urodynamic effect of acute transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in overactive bladder. J Urol. 2003;169:2210–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zecca C, Digesu GA, Robshaw P, Singh A, Elneil S, Gobbi C. Maintenance percutaneous posterior nerve stimulation for refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: an open label, multicenter, prospective study. J Urol. 2014;191(3):697–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.•
    Sajadi KP, Goldman HB. Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13(5):389–93. An overview of the many types of urinary augmentation and diversion surgeries, their indications, and their techniques.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Biers SB, Venn SN, Greenwell TJ. The past, present and future of augmentation cystoplasty. BJUI. 2011;109:1280–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gurung, Attar KH, Abdul-Rahman A, et al. Long-term outcomes of augmentation ileocystoplasty in patients with spinal cord injury: a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. BJU Int. 2012;109:1236–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaida P, Pinter AB, Harangi F, et al. Metabolic findings after colocystoplasty in children. Urology. 2003;62:542–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kälble T, Hofmann I, Thüroff JW, et al. Secondary malignancies in urinary diversions. Urologe A. 2012;51(4):500. 502-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Coyne KS, Wein A, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Milsom I. Economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(2):130–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.McKay Department of UrologyCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations