Current Urology Reports

, 15:382 | Cite as

Affordable Care Act: Implications in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Female Urology


The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 marks an important milestone in redefining how healthcare will be practiced in the United States for decades to come. This review article will outline the basic concepts associated with the PPACA, including value-based purchasing, pay for performance, accountable care organizations, bundled payments, and patient-centered medical homes, and will discuss how each of these components of the PPACA will impact the subspecialty of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS).


Value-Based Purchasing Accountable Care Organizations Bundled Payments Patient-Centered Medical Homes Quality Measure Guideline Clinical Data Registry 


Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Anne M. Suskind has received a grant from NIDDK (T32).

Dr. J. Quentin Clemens has served as a consultant for Medtronic and Afferent Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Clemens owns stock in Merck. Dr. Clemens received multiple grants from NIDDK (U01 DK082345-05; R01 DK083927; R24 DK094583-01; U01 DK099932).

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.•
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Health Data 2012; how does the United States Compare. 2012. This is a good and contemporary descripton of how the United States compares in GDP and per capita health expenditures to other developed countries. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health care system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGlynn EA, Brook RH. Keeping quality on the policy agenda. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(3):82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;348(26):2635–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? The Milbank quarterly. 1998;76(4):517–63. 09.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anger JT, Saigal CS, Madison R, Joyce G, Litwin MS. Increasing costs of urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. The Journal of urology. 2006;176(1):247–51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00588-X. discussion 51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2001;98(4):646–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sung VW, Washington B, Raker CA. Costs of ambulatory care related to female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(5):483 e1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodenheimer T. The American health care system–the movement for improved quality in health care. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;340(6):488–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(11):1000–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.••
    American Urological Association. Guidelines. 2013. Accessed June 11, 2013 2013. Important access to all AUA guidelines
  12. 12.••
    Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines we can Trust. 2011. Good description on how to create and develop meaningful guidelines Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring Vol. 1. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR, Fleming B, Houck PM, Kussmaul AE, et al. Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284(13):1670–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.••
    Democratic Policy Committee. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Cost Containment. 2010. Very good summary on the Affordable Care Act Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Centers for Medicaire and Medicaid Services. 2013 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide -- Claims-based Reporting for Incentinve. 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.••
    Centers for Medicaire and Medicaid Services. 2012 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measures List. 2012. Important list of the measures used for the physician quality reporting sytstem Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keegan KA, Penson DF. The patient protection and affordable care act: The impact on urologic cancer care. Urologic oncology. 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Casale AS, Paulus RA, Selna MJ, Doll MC, Bothe Jr AE, McKinley KE, et al. “ProvenCareSM”: a provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Annals of surgery. 2007;246(4):613–21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a996. discussion 21–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Filson CP, Hollingsworth JM, Skolarus TA, Clemens JQ, Hollenbeck BK. Health care reform in 2010: transforming the delivery system to improve quality of care. World journal of urology. 2011;29(1):85–90. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0609-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palfrey JS. Child Health in America; Making a Difference Through Advocacy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grumbach K, Grundy P. Outcomes of Implementing Patient Centered Medical Home Interventions: A Review of the Evidence from Prospective Evaluation Studies in the United States. 2010Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fisher ES. Building a medical neighborhood for the medical home. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;359(12):1202–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0806233.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Progress on Pelvic Floor Disorders (PFDs); Research and Collaborative Efforts of Scientists, Clinicians, and Patients Result in Advances. 2013. Accessed June 17, 2013.
  25. 25.
    American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Building a national PFD registry. July 19, 2012.
  26. 26.
    FDA. Public Health Notificatoin: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. 2008;
  27. 27.
    FDA. Safety Communication: UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated wtih Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. 2011;
  28. 28.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants; FDA's Role and Activities. 2013. Accessed June 17, 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations