Current Urology Reports

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 184–191 | Cite as

Does Robotic Prostatectomy Meet Its Promise in the Management of Prostate Cancer?

Prostate Cancer (D Parekh, Section Editor)

Abstract

Following Walsh’s advances in pelvic anatomy and surgical technique to minimize intraoperative peri-prostatic trauma more than 30 years ago, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) evolved to become the gold standard treatment of localized prostate cancer, with excellent long-term survival outcomes [1•]. However, RRP is performed with great heterogeneity, even among high volume surgeons, and subtle differences in surgical technique result in clinically significant differences in recovery of urinary and sexual function. Since the initial description of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in 2000 [2], and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval shortly thereafter, RARP has been rapidly adopted and has overtaken RRP as the most popular surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer in the United States [3]. However, the surgical management of prostate cancer remains controversial. This is confounded by the idolatry of new technologies and aggressive marketing versus conservatism in embracing tradition. Herein, we review the literature to compare RRP to RARP in terms of perioperative, oncologic, and quality-of-life outcomes as well as healthcare costs. This is a particularly relevant, given the absence of randomized trials and long-term (more than 10-year) follow-up for RARP biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Open retropubic radical prostatectomy Outcomes Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy Oncological Outcomes Continence Potency 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998;160(6 Pt 2):2418–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol. 2000;10(4):520–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1392–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertsen PC, Kramer BS. The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273(7):548–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, Mehta SS, Carroll PR. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2141–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):981–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb 3rd RL, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chou R, Lefevre ML. Prostate cancer screening–the evidence, the recommendations, and the clinical implications. JAMA. 2011;306(24):2721–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crawford ED, Grubb III R, Black A, et al. Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):355–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Eng J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Eng J Med. 2012;366(11):981–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Eng J Med. 2011;364(18):1708–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Eng J Med. 2012;367(3):203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    • Thompson Jr IM, Tangen CM. Prostate cancer–uncertainty and a way forward. N Eng J Med. 2012;367(3):270–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    • Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carlsson S, Adolfsson J, Bratt O, et al. Nationwide population-based study on 30-day mortality after radical prostatectomy in Sweden. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(5):350–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gilbert SM, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Daignault S, Ye Z, Hollenbeck BK. Mortality after urologic cancer surgery: impact of non-index case volume. Urology. 2008;71(5):906–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol. 2010;183(3):990–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhandari A, Mcintire L, Kaul SA, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M. Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J Urol. 2005;174(3):915–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):945–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lasser MS, Renzulli 2nd J, Turini 3rd GA, Haleblian G, Sax HC, Pareek G. An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;75(5):1083–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2299–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lepor H, Kaci L. Contemporary evaluation of operative parameters and complications related to open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;62(4):702–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohamad BA, Marszalek M, Brossner C, et al. Radical prostatectomy in Austria: a nationwide analysis of 16,524 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):684–8. discussion 689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Optenberg SA, Wojcik BE, Thompson IM. Morbidity and mortality following radical prostatectomy: a national analysis of Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services beneficiaries. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1870–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF, et al. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100 % Medicare sample. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):803–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):453–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009;104(4):534–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Krambeck AE, Dimarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103(4):448–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bolenz C, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Costs of Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. In press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital. Sweden Urology. 2010;75(5):1092–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    •• Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(14):2278–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Breyer BN, Davis CB, Cowan JE, Kane CJ, Carroll PR. Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1734–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):679–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gainsburg DM, Wax D, Reich DL, Carlucci JR, Samadi DB. Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy. Jsls. 2010;14(1):1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kordan Y, Barocas DA, Altamar HO, et al. Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106(7):1036–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience. Rev Urol. 2010;12(1):35–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92(3):205–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yuh BE, Nazmy M, Ruel NH, et al. Standardized analysis of frequency and severity of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):806–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith Jr JA. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67(2):360–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nilsson AE, Carlsson S, Laven BA, Wiklund NP. Karolinska prostatectomy: a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(6):453–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;177(3):929–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168(3):945–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stattin P, Holmberg E, Johansson JE, Holmberg L, Adolfsson J, Hugosson J. Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(13):950–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1591–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Choi WW, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, D'amico AV, Williams SB, Hu JC. The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume. Urol Oncol. 2012;30(5):569–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    • Masterson TA, Cheng L, Boris RS, Koch MO. Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes. Urol Oncol. In press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):382–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1037–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, et al. Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):838–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1366–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chino J, Schroeck FR, Sun L, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy. BJU Int. 2009;104(10):1496–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Penson DF. The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2001;3(3):113–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1803–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, et al. Preoperative criteria to select patients for bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med. 2010;7(2 Pt 1):839–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36(3):259–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;74(3):619–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):418–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Salonia A, Burnett AL, Graefen M, et al. Prevention and management of postprostatectomy sexual dysfunctions part 1: choosing the right patient at the right time for the right surgery. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):261–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):413–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):2003–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 1999;162(2):433–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1729–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC. Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol. 1991;145(3):512–4. discussion 514–515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lei Y, Alemozaffar M, Williams SB, et al. Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59(2):235–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):72–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y, et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;56(6):972–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, et al. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;60(3):536–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cappelleri JC, Siegel RL, Glasser DB, Osterloh IH, Rosen RC. Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile dysfunction and the sexual health inventory for men. Clin Ther. 2001;23(10):1707–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RH. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care. 1998;36(7):1002–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000;56(6):899–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):541–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011;107(1):100–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    • Malcolm JB, Fabrizio MD, Barone BB, et al. Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1822–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    • Miller J, Smith A, Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 1):854–8. discussion 859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hohwu L, Akre O, Pedersen KV, Jonsson M, Nielsen CV, Gustafsson O. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(4):259–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1431–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wilson T, Torrey R. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21(3):200–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Scales Jr CD, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Smith Jr JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2385–9. discussion 2389–2390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Patel HR, Linares A, Joseph JV. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Surg Oncol. 2009;18(3):242–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations