Current Urology Reports

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 467–473 | Cite as

Update on Vasectomy Protocol

Office Urology (N Shore, Section Editor)
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Vasectomy is a commonly practiced form of male contraception with over half a million procedures performed annually. Among urologists who perform the procedure, there is considerable variation in pre-procedure patient counseling, vasectomy technique, and post-procedure practices regarding confirmation of sterility. We report an overview of the vasectomy literature published within the past year with a focus on guidelines that have been recently published by two major organizations, the American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU).

Keywords

Vasectomy Vasectomy reversal Sterilization Male contraceptive Male contraception Pregnancy Testis 

Notes

Disclosure

The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Vasectomy. In: Shoupe D, Haseltine FP, editors. Contraception. New York: Springer; 1993. p. 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, et al. Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 2006;26:1–142.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awsare NS, Krishnan J, Boustead GB, et al. Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(6):406–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. http://www.auanet.org/content/clinical-practice-guidelines/clinical-guidelines.cfm. Accessed 7/30/2012. This document outlines evidence-based recommendations based on a comprehensive review of vasectomy-related literature published from 1949-2011.
  5. 5.
    Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    •• European Association of Urology Working Group on Male Infertility. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):159-63. This article provides evidence-based information and recommendations based on a systematic review of literature published from 1980-2010. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alderman PM. The lurking sperm. A review of failures in 8879 vasectomies performed by one physician. JAMA. 1988;259(21):3142–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barone MA, Johnson CH, Luick MR, et al. Characteristics of men receiving vasectomies in the United States, 1998-1999. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kendrick JS, Gonzales B, Huber D, et al. Complications of vasectomies in the United States. J Fam Pract. 1987;25:245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morris C, Mishra K, Kirkman RJ. A study to assess the prevalence of chronic testicular pain in post-vasectomy men compared to non-vasectomised men. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002;28:142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leslie TA, Illing RO, Cranston DW, et al. The incidence of chronic scrotal pain after vasectomy: a prospective audit. BJU Int. 2007;100:1330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coady SA, Sharrett AR, Zheng ZJ, et al. Vasectomy, inflammation, atherosclerosis and long-term followup for cardiovascular diseases: no associations in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. J Urol. 2002;167:204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Seagrott V, et al. Cancer and cardiovascular disease after vasectomy: an epidemiological database study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    •• Massey Jr FJ, Bernstein GS, O’Fallon WM, et al. Vasectomy and health: results from a large cohort study. JAMA. 1984;252:1023–9. This large retrospective study establishes the absence of cardiovascular effects of vasectomy.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nienhuis H, Goldacre M, Seagroatt V, et al. Incidence of disease after vasectomy: a record linkage retrospective study. BMJ. 1992;304:743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas AA, Nguyen CT, Dhar N, et al. Topical anesthesia with EMLA does not decrease pain during vasectomy. J Urol. 2008;180:271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cooper TP. Use of EMLA cream with vasectomy. Urology. 2002;60:135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stockton DM, Davis LE, Bolton KM. No-scalpel vasectomy: a technique for family physicians. Am Fam Physician. 1992;46:1153–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li SQ, Goldstein M, Zhu J, et al. The no-scalpel vasectomy. J Urol. 1991;145:341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaplan KA, Huether CA. A clinical study of vasectomy failure and recanalization. J Urol. 1975;113:71–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt SS, Free MJ. The bipolar needle for vasectomy. I. Experience with the first 1000 cases. Fertil Steril. 1978;29:676.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Black T, Francome C. The evolution of the Marie Stopes electrocautery no-scalpel vasectomy procedure. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002;28:137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    • Cook LA, Van Vliet H, Lopez LM, et al. Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, CD003991. This article reviewed six randomized controlled trials comparing vasectomy techniques. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cooper G, Walker J, Harris D, et al. Use of text messaging to audit early clinical outcome following vasectomy in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(585):280–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Edwards IS. Earlier testing after vasectomy, based on the absence of motile sperm. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwingl PJ, Guess HA. Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    •• WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Fifth edition, 2010. This document establishes standards for the performance of semen analysis, which in turn forms the basis for determining success of vasectomy. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shulte RT, Keller LM, Hiner MR, et al. Temporal decreases in sperm motility: which patients should have motility checked at both 1 and 2 hours after collection? J Androl. 2008;29:2728.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Hancock P, McLaughlin E. British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:812–6. This article establishes principles for timing and interpretation of post-vasectomy semen samples.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Labrecque M, Hays M, Chen-Mok M, et al. Frequency and patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy. BMC Urol. 2006;6:25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haldar N, Cranston D, Turner E, et al. How reliable is vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men. Lancet. 2000;356:43–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyBeth Israel Medical Center of Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations