Urinary Tract Infections in Children: Recommendations for Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Evaluation. An Evidence-Based Approach
- 303 Downloads
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in children, but the routine work-up and treatment recommendations are still controversial. Long-term complications, including renal scarring, hypertension, and renal failure, have been the main concern and the reason for use of antibiotic prophylaxis and invasive imaging techniques. In the past several years, numerous studies have been published comparing different imaging protocols and questioning the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. The latest guidelines from the United Kingdom, published in 2007, recommend more selective approach based on evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the literature published in the past 5 years. The risk of developing long-term complications after a UTI is extremely low, and the evidence suggests selective imaging to a select group of children at risk. Finding those at risk for long-term complications is yet to be determined.
KeywordsUrinary tract infection Voiding cystourethrogram DMSA Evidence based
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Quality Improvement. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection [no authors listed]. Pediatrics 1999, 103:843–852.Google Scholar
- 3.Guidelines for the management of acute urinary tract infection in childhood. Report of a Working Group of the Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians [no authors listed]. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1991, 25:36–42.Google Scholar
- 13.• Roussey-Kesler G, Gadjos V, Idres N, et al.: Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux: results from a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2008, 179:674–679; discussion 679. This well-concluded randomized study demonstrated that prophylactic antibiotics do not reduce the overall incidence of UTI in children with low-grade VUR. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Claesson I, Jacobsson B, Jodal U, Winberg J: Early detection of nephropathy in childhood urinary tract infection. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981, 22:315–320.Google Scholar
- 17.• Novak TE, Mathews R, Martz K, Neu A: Progression of chronic kidney disease in children with vesicoureteral reflux: the North American Pediatric Renal Trials Collaborative Studies Database. J Urol 2009, 182:1678–1681. This well-designed retrospective cohort study showed that VUR was the cause of chronic kidney disease in only 8.2% of patients, and they had a slower rate of progression to end-stage kidney disease compared with children with other causes of chronic kidney disease. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Urinary tract infection in children: diagnosis, treatment and long-term management. In National Health and Clinical Excellence. Edited by National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. London: Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists Press; 2007:1–148. Available at http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG54.
- 24.• Pennesi M, Travan L, Peratoner L, et al.: Is antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux effective in preventing pyelonephritis and renal scars? A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2008, 121:e1489–e1494. This multicenter RCT demonstrated no significant reduction in rate of recurrent pyelonephritis or renal scarring in children with grades II through IV VUR on prophylactic antibiotics.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.• Montini G, Rigon L, Zucchetta P, et al.: Prophylaxis after first febrile urinary tract infection in children? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Pediatrics 2008, 122:1064–1071. This RCT showed no difference in the rate of recurrent febrile UTIs in children with or without nonsevere VUR on antibiotic prophylaxis after the first UTI. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.•• Craig JC, Simpson JM, Williams GJ, et al.: Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:1748–1759. This important study demonstrated a significant decrease in the number of UTIs in predisposed children on a long-term antibiotic prophylaxis. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.• Montini G, Zucchetta P, Tomasi L, et al.: Value of imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children: data from Italian renal infection study 1. Pediatrics 2009, 123:e239–e246. This well-designed study questioned the role of imaging in the acute phase of a UTI. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Soccorso G, Wagstaff J, Blakey K, et al.: Investigating febrile UTI in infants: is a cystogram necessary? J Pediatr Urol 2009 Jul 18 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 59.Herz D, Merguerian PA, Danielson C, et al.: 5-year prospective results of DMSA imaging in children with febrile urinary tract infections: proof the top-down approach works. Presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics National Convention. Washington DC; October 17–20, 2009.Google Scholar