Current Urology Reports

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 98–108 | Cite as

Urinary Tract Infections in Children: Recommendations for Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Evaluation. An Evidence-Based Approach

  • Paul A. Merguerian
  • Einar F. Sverrisson
  • Daniel B. Herz
  • Leslie T. McQuiston
Article

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in children, but the routine work-up and treatment recommendations are still controversial. Long-term complications, including renal scarring, hypertension, and renal failure, have been the main concern and the reason for use of antibiotic prophylaxis and invasive imaging techniques. In the past several years, numerous studies have been published comparing different imaging protocols and questioning the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. The latest guidelines from the United Kingdom, published in 2007, recommend more selective approach based on evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the literature published in the past 5 years. The risk of developing long-term complications after a UTI is extremely low, and the evidence suggests selective imaging to a select group of children at risk. Finding those at risk for long-term complications is yet to be determined.

Keywords

Urinary tract infection Voiding cystourethrogram DMSA Evidence based 

Notes

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Stark H: Urinary tract infections in girls: the cost-effectiveness of currently recommended investigative routines. Pediatr Nephrol 1997, 11:174–177; discussion 80–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Quality Improvement. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection [no authors listed]. Pediatrics 1999, 103:843–852.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guidelines for the management of acute urinary tract infection in childhood. Report of a Working Group of the Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians [no authors listed]. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1991, 25:36–42.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montini G, Toffolo A, Zucchetta P, et al.: Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ 2007, 335:386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jahnukainen T, Chen M, Celsi G: Mechanisms of renal damage owing to infection. Pediatr Nephrol 2005, 20:1043–1053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martinell J, Hansson S, Claesson I, et al.: Detection of urographic scars in girls with pyelonephritis followed for 13–38 years. Pediatr Nephrol 2000, 14:1006–1010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobson SH, Eklof O, Lins LE, et al.: Long-term prognosis of post-infectious renal scarring in relation to radiological findings in childhood: a 27-year follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol 1992, 6:19–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobson SH, Eklof O, Eriksson CG, et al.: Development of hypertension and uraemia after pyelonephritis in childhood: 27 year follow up. BMJ 1989, 299:703–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gordon I, Barkovics M, Pindoria S, et al.: Primary vesicoureteric reflux as a predictor of renal damage in children hospitalized with urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003, 14:739–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghiro L, Cracco AT, Sartor M, et al.: Retrospective study of children with acute pyelonephritis. Evaluation of bacterial etiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, drug management and imaging studies. Nephron 2002, 90:8–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams GJ, Wei L, Lee A, Craig JC: Long-term antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 3:CD001534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garin EH, Olavarria F, Garcia Nieto V, et al.: Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics 2006, 117:626–632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Roussey-Kesler G, Gadjos V, Idres N, et al.: Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux: results from a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2008, 179:674–679; discussion 679. This well-concluded randomized study demonstrated that prophylactic antibiotics do not reduce the overall incidence of UTI in children with low-grade VUR. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ridson RA: The small scarred kidney of childhood. A congenital or an acquired lesion? Pediatr Nephrol 1987, 1:632–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Claesson I, Jacobsson B, Jodal U, Winberg J: Early detection of nephropathy in childhood urinary tract infection. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981, 22:315–320.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Craig JC, Irwig LM, Knight JF, Roy LP: Does treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in childhood prevent end-stage renal disease attributable to reflux nephropathy? Pediatrics 2000, 105:1236–1241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Novak TE, Mathews R, Martz K, Neu A: Progression of chronic kidney disease in children with vesicoureteral reflux: the North American Pediatric Renal Trials Collaborative Studies Database. J Urol 2009, 182:1678–1681. This well-designed retrospective cohort study showed that VUR was the cause of chronic kidney disease in only 8.2% of patients, and they had a slower rate of progression to end-stage kidney disease compared with children with other causes of chronic kidney disease. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Urinary tract infection in children: diagnosis, treatment and long-term management. In National Health and Clinical Excellence. Edited by National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. London: Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists Press; 2007:1–148. Available at http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG54.
  19. 19.
    Androulakakis PA, Ransley PG, Risdon RA, et al.: Microvascular changes in the early stage of reflux pyelonephritis. An experimental study in the pig kidney. Eur Urol 1987, 13:219–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olbing H, Claesson I, Ebel KD, et al.: Renal scars and parenchymal thinning in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a 5-year report of the International Reflux Study in Children (European branch). J Urol 1992, 148:1653–1656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smellie JM, Barratt TM, Chantler C, et al.: Medical versus surgical treatment in children with severe bilateral vesicoureteric reflux and bilateral nephropathy: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001, 357:1329–1333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keren R: Imaging and treatment strategies for children after first urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Pediatr 2007, 19:705–710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weiss R, Duckett J, Spitzer A: Results of a randomized clinical trial of medical versus surgical management of infants and children with grades III and IV primary vesicoureteral reflux (United States). The International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol 1992, 148:1667–1673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    • Pennesi M, Travan L, Peratoner L, et al.: Is antibiotic prophylaxis in children with vesicoureteral reflux effective in preventing pyelonephritis and renal scars? A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2008, 121:e1489–e1494. This multicenter RCT demonstrated no significant reduction in rate of recurrent pyelonephritis or renal scarring in children with grades II through IV VUR on prophylactic antibiotics.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Montini G, Rigon L, Zucchetta P, et al.: Prophylaxis after first febrile urinary tract infection in children? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Pediatrics 2008, 122:1064–1071. This RCT showed no difference in the rate of recurrent febrile UTIs in children with or without nonsevere VUR on antibiotic prophylaxis after the first UTI. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    •• Craig JC, Simpson JM, Williams GJ, et al.: Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:1748–1759. This important study demonstrated a significant decrease in the number of UTIs in predisposed children on a long-term antibiotic prophylaxis. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smyth AR, Judd BA: Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis in urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child 1993, 68:235–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keren R, Carpenter MA, Hoberman A, et al.: Rationale and design issues of the Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) study. Pediatrics 2008, 122(Suppl 5):S240–S250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoberman A, Charron M, Hickey RW, et al.: Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marks SD, Gordon I, Tullus K: Imaging in childhood urinary tract infections: time to reduce investigations. Pediatr Nephrol 2008, 23:9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang HP, Lai YC, Tsai IJ, et al.: Renal ultrasonography should be done routinely in children with first urinary tract infections. Urology 2008, 71:439–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee MD, Lin CC, Huang FY, et al.: Screening young children with a first febrile urinary tract infection for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux with renal ultrasound scanning and technetium-99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid scanning. J Pediatr 2009, 154:797–802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luk WH, Woo YH, Au-Yeung AW, Chan JC: Imaging in pediatric urinary tract infection: a 9-year local experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:1253–1260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    • Montini G, Zucchetta P, Tomasi L, et al.: Value of imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children: data from Italian renal infection study 1. Pediatrics 2009, 123:e239–e246. This well-designed study questioned the role of imaging in the acute phase of a UTI. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muller L, Preda I, Jacobsson B, et al.: Ultrasonography as predictor of permanent renal damage in infants with urinary tract infection. Acta Paediatr 2009, 98:1156–1161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sastre JB, Aparicio AR, Cotallo GD, et al.: Urinary tract infection in the newborn: clinical and radio imaging studies. Pediatr Nephrol 2007, 22:1735–1741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soccorso G, Wagstaff J, Blakey K, et al.: Investigating febrile UTI in infants: is a cystogram necessary? J Pediatr Urol 2009 Jul 18 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Narchi H, Donovan R: Renal power Doppler ultrasound does not predict renal scarring after urinary tract infection. Scott Med J 2008, 53:7–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee HY, Hyun Soh B, Hee Hong C, et al.: The efficacy of ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in predicting vesicoureteral reflux in children below the age of 2 years with their first febrile urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol 2009, 24:2009–2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sinha MD, Gibson P, Kane T, Lewis MA: Accuracy of ultrasonic detection of renal scarring in different centres using DMSA as the gold standard. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007, 22:2213–2216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Temiz Y, Tarcan T, Onol FF, et al.: The efficacy of Tc99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (Tc-DMSA) scintigraphy and ultrasonography in detecting renal scars in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Int Urol Nephrol 2006, 38:149–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Levart TK, Kljucevsek D, Kenig A, Kenda RB: Sensitivity of ultrasonography in detecting renal parenchymal defects: 6 years’ follow-up. Pediatr Nephrol 2009, 24:1193–1197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Polito C, Rambaldi PF, Signoriello G, et al.: Permanent renal parenchymal defects after febrile UTI are closely associated with vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 2006, 21:521–526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moorthy I, Easty M, McHugh K, et al.: The presence of vesicoureteric reflux does not identify a population at risk for renal scarring following a first urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child 2005, 90:733–736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Westwood ME, Whiting PF, Cooper J, et al.: Further investigation of confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2005, 5:2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yamazaki Y, Shiroyanagi Y, Matsuno D, Nishi M: Predicting early recurrent urinary tract infection in pretoilet trained children with vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 2009, 182:1699–1702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wheeler DM, Vimalachandra D, Hodson EM, et al.: Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, 3:CD001532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chesney RW, Carpenter MA, Moxey-Mims M, et al.: Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR): background commentary of RIVUR investigators. Pediatrics 2008, 122(Suppl 5):S233–S239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Greenfield SP, Chesney RW, Carpenter M, et al.: Vesicoureteral reflux: the RIVUR study and the way forward. J Urol 2008, 179:405–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Mathews R, Chesney R, Hoberman A, et al.: Controversies in the management of vesicoureteral reflux: the rationale for the RIVUR study. J Pediatr Urol 2009, 5:336–341. This article discusses the rationale for the RIVUR study and its limitations. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cheng EY: PIC cystography: an effective test for the diagnosis of clinically significant occult reflux. J Urol 2009, 182:1264–1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pohl HG: PIC cystography: a selective approach to the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 2009, 182:1263–1264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hansson S, Dhamey M, Sigstrom O, et al.: Dimercapto-succinic acid scintigraphy instead of voiding cystourethrography for infants with urinary tract infection. J Urol 2004, 172:1071–1073; discussion 1073–1074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Preda I, Jodal U, Sixt R, et al.: Normal dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy makes voiding cystourethrography unnecessary after urinary tract infection. J Pediatr 2007, 151:581–584, 584.e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tseng MH, Lin WJ, Lo WT, et al.: Does a normal DMSA obviate the performance of voiding cystourethrography in evaluation of young children after their first urinary tract infection? J Pediatr 2007, 150:96–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tse NK, Yuen SL, Chiu MC, et al.: Imaging studies for first urinary tract infection in infants less than 6 months old: can they be more selective? Pediatr Nephrol 2009, 24:1699–1703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ajdinovic B, Jaukovic L, Krstic Z, Dopuda M: Impact of micturating cystourethrography and DMSA renal scintigraphy on the investigation scheme in children with urinary tract infection. Ann Nucl Med 2008, 22:661–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brader P, Riccabona M, Schwarz T, et al.: Value of comprehensive renal ultrasound in children with acute urinary tract infection for assessment of renal involvement: comparison with DMSA scintigraphy and final diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2981–2989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Herz D, Merguerian PA, Danielson C, et al.: 5-year prospective results of DMSA imaging in children with febrile urinary tract infections: proof the top-down approach works. Presented at the American Academy of Pediatrics National Convention. Washington DC; October 17–20, 2009.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chan YL, Chan KW, Yeung CK, et al.: Potential utility of MRI in the evaluation of children at risk of renal scarring. Pediatr Radiol 1999, 29:856–862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kavanagh EC, Ryan S, Awan A, et al.: Can MRI replace DMSA in the detection of renal parenchymal defects in children with urinary tract infections? Pediatr Radiol 2005, 35:275–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kovanlikaya A, Okkay N, Cakmakci H, et al.: Comparison of MRI and renal cortical scintigraphy findings in childhood acute pyelonephritis: preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 2004, 49:76–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Leyendecker JR, Clingan MJ: Magnetic resonance urography update: are we there yet? Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009, 30:246–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Leyendecker JR, Gianini JW: Magnetic resonance urography. Abdom Imaging 2009, 34:527–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Merguerian
    • 1
  • Einar F. Sverrisson
    • 1
  • Daniel B. Herz
    • 1
  • Leslie T. McQuiston
    • 1
  1. 1.Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonUSA

Personalised recommendations