Advertisement

Current Urology Reports

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 359–363 | Cite as

Thoughts on midurethral synthetic slings

  • Scott SerelsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Since the early 1900s, there have been many attempts to correct stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Over the years, it became accepted that the most effective way to correct SUI involved a procedure that supports the urethra. This simple premise spurred major innovations in the 1970s and 1980s by Shlomo Raz and Tom Stamey, many of which proved difficult to reproduce and were not universally accepted. In the mid-1990s, however, Ulf Ulmsten and Peter Petros revolutionized treatment of SUI, using a synthetic sling at the midurethra in a tension-free fashion. The urologic and urogynecologic world forever changed. In the last decade, further innovations have been based on these principles. There are currently three main types of synthetic sling procedures, including the retropubic synthetic sling, the obturator synthetic sling, and the single-incision synthetic sling.

Keywords

Stress Urinary Incontinence Pubovaginal Sling Transobturator Tape Vaginal Erosion Transobturator Sling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Cross CA, Cespedes RD, McGuire EJ. Our experience with pubovaginal slings in patients with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1998, 159:1195–1198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL: Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol 1999, 162:2070–2072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guerrero KL, Lucas MG: Do nonautologous biological slings have a future. Curr Opin Urol 2006, 16:229–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah DK, Paul EM, Amukele S, et al.: Broad based tensionfree synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year outcome. J Urol 2003, 170:849–851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M: A three-year follow up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999, 106:345–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nilsson CG, Falconer C, Rezapour M: Seven-year follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:1259–1262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morgan DM, Dunn RL, Fenner DE, et al.: Comparative analysis of urinary incontinence severity after autologous fascia pubovaginal sling, pubovaginal sling and tension-free vaginal slings. J Urol 2007, 177:604–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegel AL, Kim M, Goldstein M, et al.: High incidence of vaginal mesh extrusion using the intravaginal slingplasty sling. J Urol 2005, 174:1308–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Comiter CV, Colegrove PM: High rate of vaginal extrusion of silicone-coated polyester sling. Urology 2004, 63:1066–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giberti C, Roviodi S: Transvaginal bone-anchored synthetic sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: an outcome analysis. Urology 2000, 56:956–961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boublil V, Ciofu C, Traxer O, et al.: Complications of urethral sling procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002, 14:515–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker, L. et al.: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:805–823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolle D, Tamussino K, Hanzal E, et al.: Bleeding complications with the tension-free vaginal tape operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:2045–2049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamussino KF, Hanzal E, Kolle D, et al.: Tension-free vaginal tape operation: results of the Austrian registry. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 98:732–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeffry L, Deval B, Birsan A, et al.: Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology 2001, 58:702–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, et al.: Transobturator tape (uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2004, 45:203–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Botros SM, Miller JJ, Goldberg RP, et al.: Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence following trans obturator versus midurethral slings. Neuro Urodyn 2007, 26:42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grise P, Droupy S, Saussine, C, et al.: Transobturator sling for female stress incontinence with polypropylene tape and outsidein procedure: prospective study with 1 year follow-up and review of transobturator tape sling. Urology 2006, 68:759–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davila GW, Johnson JD, Serels S: Multicenter experience with the monarc transobturator sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006, 17:460–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Leval J, Waltregny D: New surgical technique for treatment of stress urinary incontinence TVT-Obturator: new developments and results. Surg Technol Int 2005, 14:212–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dietz HP, Barry C, Lim Y, et al.: TVT vs. monarc: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, 17:566–569.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee KS, Han DH, Choi YS, et al.: A prospective trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator vaginal tape inside-out for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1 year followup. J Urol 2007, 177:214–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barber MD, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Chen CC, et al.: Perioperative complications and adverse events of the monarc transobturator tape, compared with the tension-free vaginal tape. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195:1820–1825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lim JL, Quinlan DJ.: Safety of a new transobturator suburethral sling (TVT-O) procedure during the training phase. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007, 28:214–217.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karsenty G, Boman J, Elzayat E, et al.: Severe soft tissue infection of the thigh after vaginal erosion of transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, 18:207–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldman HB. Large thigh abscess after placement of synthetic transobturator sling. Int Urogyn J 2006, 17:295–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bladder Control Center of Norwalk, Section of UrogynecologyNorwalk HospitalNorwalkUSA

Personalised recommendations