Current Urology Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 376–383

A urogynecologist’s view of the pelvic floor effects of vaginal delivery/cesarean section for the urologist



Pregnancy and parturition have been implicated in the development of pelvic floor dysfunction. These disorders include urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and other pelvic and sexual dysfunctions. The urologist caring for women with urinary dysfunction needs to be familiar with the causes of pelvic floor dysfunction and their implications. Defects of the pelvic floor have clearly resulted from the traumatic effect of vaginal delivery. The likely mechanisms of injuries during vaginal delivery involve stretching and compression of the pudendal nerve and peripheral branches, as well as an additional tearing of muscles and connective tissue. Optimal management of labor and optimal techniques of repair of unavoidable sphincteric lacerations, ante- and postpartum pelvic floor muscle conditioning, and timely and proper indications for cesarean delivery will minimize the effect of incidental traumatic delivery.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al.: Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeLancey JO: The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1488–1495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, et al.: Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:489–497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Coates KW, et al.: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1998, 92:951–954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nygaard I: Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function? Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:253–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sand PK: Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function? Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:255–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genadry RR: Urogynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1993, 5:437–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu Z, Zhao Y, Pawlyk B, et al.: Failure of elastic fiber homeostasis leads to pelvic floor disorders. Am J Pathol 2006, 168:519–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harvey MA, Johnston SL, Davies GA: Second trimester serum relaxin concentrations are associated with pelvic organ prolapse following childbirth. J Pelvic Med Surg 2004, 10(suppl 1):S50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen B, Wen Y, Yu X, et al.: Elastin metabolism in pelvic tissues: Is it modulated by reproductive hormones? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1605–1613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee HY, Zhao S, Fields PA, et al.: Clinical use of Relaxin to facilitate birth: reasons for investigating the premise. Ann NY Acad Sci 2005, 1041:351–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Boyle AL, O’Boyle JD, Calhoun B, et al.: Pelvic organ support in pregnancy and postpartum. Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jundt K, Kiening M, Fischer P, et al.: Is the histomorphological concept of the female pelvic floor and its changes due to age and vaginal delivery correct? Neurourol Urodyn 2005, 24:44–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boreham MK, Zaretsky MV, Corton MM, et al.: Appearance of the levator ani muscle in pregnancy as assessed by 3-D MRI. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:2159–2164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kruger JA, Murphy BA, Heap SW: Alterations in levator ani morphology in elite nulliparous athletes: a pilot study. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 45:42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howard D, DeLancey JO, Tunn R, et al.: Racial differences in the structure and function of the stress urinary continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 2000, 95:713–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz HP, Hansell NK, Grace ME, et al.: Bladder neck mobility is a heritable trait. BJOG 2005, 112:334–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer S, Bachelard O, DeGrandi P: Do bladder neck mobility and urethral sphincter function differ during pregnancy compared with during the non-pregnant state? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1998, 9:397–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landon CR, Crofts CE, Smith AR, et al.: Mechanical properties of fascia during pregnancy: a possible factor in the development of stress incontinence of urine. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol 1990, 2:40–46.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Viktrup L, Lose G, Rolf M, et al.: The frequency of urinary symptoms during pregnancy and the puerperium in the primiparas. Int Urogynecol J 1993, 4:27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaliha C, Stanton SL: Urological problems in pregnancy. BJU Int 2002, 89:469–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burgio KL, Zyczynski H, Lochern JL, et al.: Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102:1291–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liebling RE, Swingler R, Patel RR, et al.: Pelvic floor morbidity up to one year after difficult instrumental delivery and cesarean section in the second stage of labor: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 194:4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, et al.: Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2004, 59:601–616. Good review of pertinent maternal and fetal issues related to the choice of delivery.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van der Bom JG, et al.:How do the prevalences of urogenital symptoms change during pregnancy? Neurourol Urodyn 2006, 25:135–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lal M: Prevention of urinary and anal incontinence: role of elective cesarean delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003, 15:439–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sze E, Sherard G, Dolezal J: Pregnancy, labor, delivery, and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 100:981–986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH: The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 107:1460–1470.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dannecker C, Hillemanns P, Strauss A, et al.: Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: the influence on the urethral pressure profile, anal manometric and other pelvic floor findings. Follow-up study of a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005, 84:65–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Handa V, Harris T, Ostergard D: Protecting the pelvic floor: obstetric management to prevent incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1996, 88:470–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lien KC, Morgan DM, DeLancey JO, et al.: Pudendal nerve stretch during vaginal birth: a 3-D computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1669–1676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, et al.: Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103:31–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, et al.: Injury to the innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984, 11:546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN: Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994, 101:22–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gregory WT, Lou JS, Stuyvesant A, et al.: Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:327–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dupuis O, Madelenat P, Rudigoz RC: Fecal and urinary incontinence after delivery: risk factors and prevention. Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite 2004, 32:540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, et al.: Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 2002, 166:326–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, et al.: Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:1397–1402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McKenna DS, Ester JB, Fischer JR: Elective cesarean delivery for women with a previous anal sphincter rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 189:1251–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Faridi A, Willis S, Schelzig P, et al.: Anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery—an argument for cesarean section on request? J Perinat Med 2002, 30:379–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fornell EU, Mattiesen L, Sjodahl R, et al.: Obstetric anal sphincter injury 10 years after: subjective and objective long-term effects. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 112:12–16.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wijma J, Potters A, deWolf B, et al.: Anatomical and functional changes in the lower urinary tract following spontaneous vaginal delivery. Inter J Obstet Gynaecol 2003, 110:658–663.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dolan LM, Hosker GL, Mallett VT, et al.: Stress incontinence and pelvic floor neurophysiology 15 years after the first delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003, 110:1107–1114.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yip SK, Sahota D, Chang A, et al.: Effect of one interval vaginal delivery on the prevalence of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn 2003, 22:558–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Levet C, et al.: Stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery: a retrospective cohort survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:941–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fritel X, Ringa V, Varnoux N, et al.: Mode of delivery and severe stress incontinence: a cross-sectional study among 2625 perimenopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 112:1646–1651.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Goldberg RP, Kwon C, Gandhi S, et al.: Urinary incontinence among mothers of multiple: the protective effect of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:1447–1453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baessler K, Schuessler B: Childbirth-induced trauma to the urethral continence mechanism: review and recommendations. Urology 2003, 62:39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rohr G, Kragstrup J, Gaist D, et al.: Genetic and environmental influences on urinary incontinence: a Danish population-based twin study of middle-aged and elderly women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:978–982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Buchsbaum GM, Chin M, Glantz C, et al.: Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in a cohort of nuns. Obstet Gynecol 2002, 100:226–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goldberg RP, Abramov Y, Botros S, et al.: Delivery mode is a major environmental determinant of stress urinary incontinence: results of the Evanston-Northwestern Twin Sisters Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:2149–2153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schaffer JI, Bloom L, Casey BM, et al.: A randomized trial of the effects of coached vs uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor on postpartum pelvic floor structure and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1692–1696. Trial of nulliparous women randomized to coached versus uncoached pushing during second stage. Negative impact of coached pushing identifies a modiflable obstetric practice.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP: Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996, 103:154–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M: Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:579–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rortveit G, Hannestad YS, Daltveit AK, et al.: Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 98:1004–1010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle-Schmidt M, et al.: Obstetric risk factors for symptomatic prolapse: a population-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 194:75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Casey BM, Schaffer JI, Bloom SL, et al.: Obstetric antecedents for postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005, 192:1655–1662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Viktrup L, Lose G: The risk of stress incontinence 5 years after first delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001, 185:82–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Handa V, Harvey L, Fox H, et al.: Parity and route of delivery: Does cesarean delivery reduce bladder symptoms later in life? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:463–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buchsbaum GM, Duecy EE, Kerr LA, et al.: Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women and their parous sisters. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 106:1253–1258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rortveit G, Dalveit A, Hannestad Y, et al.: Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:900–907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Demirci F, Ozden Z, Alpay E, et al.: The effects of vaginal delivery and cesarean section on bladder neck mobility and stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2001, 12:129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Groutz A, Rimon E, Peled S, et al.: Cesarean section: Does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn 2004, 23:2–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chaliha C, Digesu A, Hutchings A, et al.: Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004, 111:754–755.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Uma R, Libby G, Murphy D: Obstetric management of a woman’s first delivery and the implications for pelvic floor surgery in later life. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005, 112:1043–1046.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Culligan PJ, Myers JA, Goldberg RP, et al.: Elective cesarean section to prevent anal incontinence and brachial plexus injuries associated with macrosomia: a decision analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2005, 16:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    NIH State of the Science Conference: Cesarean delivery on maternal request 2006CSectionSOS027html.htm. Accessed June 12, 2006. Comprehensive review of pertinent publications and their relevance to answering the questions raised by cesarean on request.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, et al.: Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term. JAMA 2002, 287:1822–1831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF: Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 97:350–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF: Anal incontinence in primiparas. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can 2001, 23:321–326.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lal M, Mann CH, Callender R, et al.: Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence? Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101:305–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    MacArthur C, Glazener CM, Wilson PD, et al.: Obstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery. BJOG 2001, 108:678–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J: Elective cesarean delivery for term breech. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101:690–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LuthervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations