Advertisement

Incidence and prevalence of overactive bladder

  • 168 Accesses

  • 19 Citations

Abstract

Recent changes in terminology, diagnosis, and therapy have refocused attention on overactive bladder (OAB). This symptom syndrome is highly prevalent worldwide and significantly impairs the quality of life of those who suffer from it. Accurate epidemiologic incidence and prevalence studies of OAB have been hampered in the past by, among other issues, a generalized lack of agreement regarding definition of the disorder, and consequently, accurate case finding. This obstacle resulted in considerably wide estimates in the reported incidence and prevalence of OAB in the literature. A new symptom-based definition of OAB, formally adopted by the Standardization Committee at a recent International Continence Society meeting, should provide a framework for future epidemiologic studies. Current estimates of incidence, prevalence, effects on quality of life, and societal costs may need to be reassessed based on these new data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.

    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al.: The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002, 21:167–178. This paper reviews the important and pertinent changes in the ICS lexicon regarding lower urinary terminology. This is an essential and long overdue update.

  2. 2.

    Abrams P, Wein AJ: The overactive bladder: from basic science to clinical management. Urology 1997, 150(Suppl 6):1–3.

  3. 3.

    Abrams P, Wein AJ: The overactive bladder and incontinence: definitions and a plea for discussion. Neurourol Urodyn 1999, 18:413–416.

  4. 4.

    Payne CK: Overactive bladder. Urology 1998, 51:1062.

  5. 5.

    Artibani W: Diagnosis and significance of idiopathic overactive bladder. Urology 1997, 50(6ASuppl):25–32.

  6. 6.

    Wein AJ: Overactive bladder: defining the disease. Am J Manage Care 2000, 6(11 Suppl):S559–564.

  7. 7.

    Payne CK: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and evaluation of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder. Urology 1998, 51(2A Suppl):3–10.

  8. 8.

    Hampel C, Weinhold D, Benker N, et al.: Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinence. Urology 1997, 50(6A Suppl):4–14.

  9. 9.

    Milsom I, Stewart W, Thuroff J: The prevalence of overactive bladder. Am J Manage Care 2000, 6(Suppl):S565–573.

  10. 10.

    Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L, et al.: How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int 2001, 87:760–766. This paper describes a very large cross-sectional sampling of patients with OAB from several countries in Europe. This is probably one of the first papers to attempt to characterize the OAB population on a large scale.

  11. 11.

    Stewart W, Herzog R, Wein A, et al.: Prevalence and impact of overactive bladder in the US: results from the NOBLE program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society. Seoul, Korea. September 18–21, 2001. This is a well-validated study of patients with OAB.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rovner, E.S., Wein, A.J. Incidence and prevalence of overactive bladder. Curr Urol Rep 3, 434–438 (2002) doi:10.1007/s11934-002-0093-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Overactive Bladder
  • Detrusor Overactivity
  • Urge Incontinence
  • International Continence Society