Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Published series
- 28 Downloads
Next to the retropubic and perineal approaches, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become the third most common technique in the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer. Although long-term oncologic data are still lacking, based on several contemporary series, it seems likely that oncologic results will fulfill expectations. Over the past decade, quality-of-life issues have come into the spotlight in oncologic surgery in particular. In this regard, the aim of the laparoscopic technique is to become the best in terms of operative stress, postoperative morbidity, catheterization time, and return to normal activities. The unique intraoperative visibility and magnification of the operative field allow ultraprecise dissection and suturing of vital neural and sphincteric structures. Will the use of this new kind of surgery translate into better functional results? The goal of this review is to analyze the published results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the context of its rapidly evolving open surgical counterpart.
KeywordsRadical Prostatectomy Bladder Neck Localize Prostate Cancer Urethral Stricture Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 7.Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, et al.: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001, 40:65–69. The authors describe their original technique of purely extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. This is an indispensable work allowing us to understanding the advantages and inconveniences of different laparoscopic approaches.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001, 166:2101–2108. The authors describe their results of a slightly modified laparoscopic approach. Although the patient population differs significantly from other laparoscopic series, there is an interesting discussion of possible explanations of the different outcomes that different techniques create.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Huland H, Hammerer P, Henke RP, Huland E: Preoperative prediction of tumor heterogeneity and recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostatic carcinoma with digital rectal, examination prostate specific antigen and the results of 6 systematic biopsies. J Urol 1996, 155:1344–1347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar