Advertisement

Current Urology Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 141–147 | Cite as

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  • András Hoznek
  • David B. Samadi
  • Laurent Salomon
  • Leif E. Olsson
  • Fabien Saint
  • Dominique Chopin
  • Clément-Claude Abbou
Article

Abstract

Laparoscopy has become an integral part of urologic surgery. Its indications have been progressively extended to the most advanced oncologic and reconstructive procedures. Within this frame, radical prostatectomy is of major interest, especially considering the incidence and clinical significance of prostate cancer. The procedure comprises several steps of challenging dissection in which the preservation of delicate nerve and muscular structures should be conciliated with safe tumor excision. The intervention ends with vesicourethral anastomosis, which is considered the most difficult reconstructive procedure in urologic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gradually become a wholly standardized procedure, and it is now routinely performed in several centers throughout the world.

Keywords

Radical Prostatectomy Seminal Vesicle Bladder Neck Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Needle Holder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Hoznek A, Salomon L, Rabii R, et al.: Vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the running suture method. J Endourol 2000, 14:749–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al.: Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001, 166:1662–1664. This article illustrates how golden rules change as surgical techniques evolve.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000, 163:1643–1649. These authors, who have accumulated the most experience worldwide in the field of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, describe their technique.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gill IS, Zippe CD: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. Urol Clin North Am 2001, 28:423–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Türk I, Deger IS, Winkelmann B, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience with 145 procedures [in German]. Urologe A 2001, 40:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kavoussi LR, Schuessler WW, Vancaillie TG, Clayman RV: Laparoscopic approach to the seminal vesicles. J Urol 1993, 150:417–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 2001, 166:2101–2108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al.: Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 2001, 40:54–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raboy A, Albert P, Ferzli G: Early experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 1998, 12:1264–1267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, et al.: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001, 40:65–69. This is an interesting and original variant of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy that has the advantage of offering an entirely extraperitoneal approach. In this respect, the technique is closer to the standard retropubic open radical prostatectomy. Long-term data and prospective studies are required to determine whether this technique has a different outcome than transperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al.: Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 2000, 10:520–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, et al.: Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001, 40:70–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rassweiler J, Frede T, Seemann O, et al.: Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience. Eur Urol 2001, 40:75–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T: Robotic and telesurgery: will they change our future? Curr Opin Urol 2001, 11:309–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • András Hoznek
    • 1
  • David B. Samadi
    • 1
  • Laurent Salomon
    • 1
  • Leif E. Olsson
    • 1
  • Fabien Saint
    • 1
  • Dominique Chopin
    • 1
  • Clément-Claude Abbou
    • 1
  1. 1.Service d’UrologieCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri MondorCréteilFrance

Personalised recommendations