Abstract
Purpose of Review
To describe the multidisciplinary approach of the Brussels-based referral center, one of the two centers for women living with female genital mutilation (FGM) in Belgium. This approach is contextualized and compared to the latest literature on the subject.
Recent Findings
According to the World Health Organization, women who have undergone FGM should be able to benefit from multidisciplinary care. Clitoral reconstructive surgery appears to be a crucial but controversial element of this holistic treatment; its long-term benefits and role in sexual satisfaction are still the focus of many questions.
Summary
Clitoral reconstructive surgery has been reimbursed by Belgian social security since 2014 only in conjunction with multidisciplinary care. In our referral center, the care is provided by a gynecologist, a midwife, a psychotherapist, and a sexologist. Five preoperative consultations are mandatory to obtain the refund. CeMaVie’s first line of treatments is non-surgical therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance •• Of major importance
WHO. Eliminating female genital mutilation [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/9789241596442/en/
Unicef. UNICEF’S DATA WORK ON FGM/C [Internet]. Unicef; 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 14]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FGMC-2016-brochure_250.pdf
Russia orders inquiry into claims of FGM in Dagestan | Society | The Guardian [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/05/russia-orders-inquiry-into-claims-of-fgm-in-dagestan
Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund I. Female “circumcision” in Africa dimensions of the practice and debates. Vol. In Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.
Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund I. Transcultural Bodies: female genital cutting in global context. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2007.
Hosken F. Genital mutilation of women in Africa. Munger Afr Libr Notes. 1976;36:3–21.
O’Neill S. Defying the Law Negotiation Change: the Futanke’s opposition to the national ban on FGM in Senegal. Vol. Unpublished PhD Thesis. London: Goldsmiths, University of London; 2013.
Boddy J. Wombs and alien spirits: women, men, and the Zar cult in Northern Sudan [Internet]. University of Wisconsin Press; 1989 [cited 2018 Jan 12]. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/8761
Ahmadu F. Rites and wrongs: an insider/outsider reflects on power and excision. Vol. Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2000.
Ahmadu F, Ain’t I. A woman too? Challenging myths of sexual dysfunction in circumcised women. Vol. Transcultural bodies: female genital cutting in global context. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2007.
Kahn S. “You see, one day they cut”: the evolution, expression, and consequences of resistance for women who oppose female genital cutting. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2016 Nov 16;26(7–8):622–35.
Koukoui S, Hassan G, Guzder J. The mothering experience of women with FGM/C raising ‘uncut’ daughters, in Ivory Coast and in Canada. Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 5;14:51.
•• Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e006316. The meta-analysis we expected on the consequences of FGM. A work that confirms or invalidates some widely held beliefs, to be considered according to the limited data available.
•• Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(3):294–303. An in-depth summary of the issues that practitioners and researchers need to consider for the present and the future.
Legros C. Pierre Foldes et Frédérique Martz, après des mutilations sexuelles réparer les corps et les âmes. Le Monde.fr [Internet]. 2017 Jul 8 [cited 2018 Jan 12]; Available from: http://www.lemonde.fr/festival/visuel/2017/07/08/apres-des-mutilations-sexuelles-reparer-les-corps-et-les-ames_5157723_4415198.html
WHO. Health complications of female genital mutilation including sequelae in childbirth [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm/who_fch_wmh_00.2/en/
Dubourg D, Richard F. Etude de prévalence des femmes excisées et des filles à risque d’excision en Belgique. Brussels: SPF Santé Publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne alimentaire et Environnement; 2014.
Foldes P, Louis-Sylvestre C. Results of surgical clitoral repair after ritual excision: 453 cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34(12):1137–41.
Foldès P, Cuzin B, Andro A. Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;380(9837):134–41.
• CMR O, Madzou S, Simporé A, Combaud V, Ouattara A, Millogo F, et al. Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation at CHU Yalgado of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. About 68 patients operated. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(9):1099–106. The author proposes a new interesting technique
Abdulcadir J, Bianchi Demicheli F, Willame A, Recordon N, Petignat P. Posttraumatic stress disorder relapse and clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(2):371–6.
•• Berg RC, Taraldsen S, Said MA, Sørbye IK, Vangen S. The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; The most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis of FGM surgery.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun 1;67(6):361–70.
Mazer NA, Leiblum SR, Rosen RC. The brief index of sexual functioning for women (BISF-W): a new scoring algorithm and comparison of normative and surgically menopausal populations. Menopause N Y N. 2000;7(5):350–63.
DeMaria AL, Hollub AV, Herbenick D. The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): validation among a sample of female college students. J Sex Med. 2012;9(3):708–18.
Ouédraogo CMR, Madzou S, Touré B, Ouédraogo A, Ouédraogo S, Lankoandé J. Practice of reconstructive plastic surgery of the clitoris after genital mutilation in Burkina Faso. Report of 94 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013;58(3):208–15.
Abdulcadir J, Boulvain M, Petignat P. Reconstructive surgery for female genital mutilation. Lancet Lond Engl. 2012;380(9837):90–2.
Puppo V. Embryology and anatomy of the vulva: the female orgasm and women’s sexual health. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jan;154(1):3–8.
Abramowicz S, Oden S, Dietrich G, Marpeau L, Resch B. Anatomic, functional and identity results after clitoris transposition. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(8):963–71.
Merckelbagh H-M, Nicolas M-N, Piketty M-P, J-L-B B. Assessment of a multidisciplinary care for 169 excised women with an initial reconstructive surgery project. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015;43(10):633–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sociocultural Issues and Epidemiology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caillet, M., O’Neill, S., Minsart, AF. et al. Addressing FGM with Multidisciplinary Care. The Experience of the Belgian Reference Center CeMAViE. Curr Sex Health Rep 10, 44–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0145-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0145-6