Sadomasochism in Sickness and in Health: Competing Claims from Science, Social Science, and Culture
- 714 Downloads
This article reviews and compares competing depictions of sadomasochism (SM) sexuality, examining portrayals that range from sick to healthy, from normal to abnormal, and from dangerous to healing. The body of this article proceeds in four parts. The first section considers the treatment of SM in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The second section addresses debates about the costs, benefits, and scientific validity of the inclusion and definition of SM in the DSM-5. It further highlights how quantitative and qualitative empirical studies of SM practitioners indicate that they fall within normal ranges in psychological and social functioning. The third section examines research on one negative consequence of the inclusion of SM in the DSM: It may interfere with the therapeutic relationship with clients who practice SM or have SM desires by reinforcing broader societal stigma and encouraging diagnostic misuse. The fourth section reviews an emerging body of research that reverses the “SM as pathology” discourse by showing the therapeutic and healing potential of bondage-discipline-dominance-submission-sadism-masochism (BDSM) practice and ethos. Based on this review, the conclusion argues that there is no valid reason to continue identifying SM as a potential mental disorder, and furthermore, there are detrimental effects of its association with pathology in the DSM-5.
KeywordsSadomasochism SM Bondage-discipline-dominance-submission-sadism-masochism BDSM Kink DSM-5 Paraphilias Paraphilic disorders Forensics and sexuality Law and sexuality Societal stigma Diagnostic misuse Healing
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Ummni Khan declares she has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Text Revision. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.American Psychiatric Association, Task Force on DSM-IV. DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.Khan U. Vicarious kinks: S/M in the socio-legal imaginary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 8.Kleinplatz P, Moser C. Is S/M pathological. Lesbian Gay Psychol Rev. 2005;6(3):255–60.Google Scholar
- 9.Moser C, Kleinplatz PJ. Does heterosexuality belong in the DSM. Lesbian Gay Psychol Rev. 2005;6(3):261–7.Google Scholar
- 17.••Frances AJ, Widiger T. Psychiatric diagnosis: lessons from the DSM-IV past and cautions for the DSM-5 future. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:109–30. This article is of importance because it draws on the authors’ experiences with the DSM-IV to provide insight on how to improve future editions of the DSM.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.•Wright S. Kinky parents and child custody: the effect of the DSM-5 differentiation between the paraphilias and paraphilic disorders. Arch Sex Behav 2014:1–2. This short article is of importance because it provides early evidence that the explicit differentiation between a paraphilic interest and a paraphilic disorder in the DSM-5 has had a positive effect for parents who are associated with BDSM in child custody cases. Google Scholar
- 20.The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom. (February 16, 2010). Kinky is not a diagnosis. Retrieved December 11, 2014, from https://ncsfreedom.org/key-programs/DSM-5-revision-project/kinky-is-not-a-diagnosis.html.
- 23.Hinderliter AC. Defining paraphilia: excluding exclusion. Open Access J Forensic Psychol. 2010;2:241–72.Google Scholar
- 25.American Psychiatric Association. Paraphilic Disorders Fact Sheet. 2013; Available at: http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Paraphilic%20Disorders%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf. Accessed December, 11, 2014.
- 26.The DSM-5 Paraphilias Subworkgroup. U 05 Sexual sadism disorder, “Rationale” tab [no longer available on-line]. Previously available at: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=188#. Accessed December, 2012.
- 27.Blanchard, R. DSM-V options: paraphilias and paraphilic disorders, pedohebephilic disorder, and transvestic disorder. 28th annual meeting of the association for the treatment of sexual abusers, October 1, 2009: http://individual.utoronto.ca/ray_blanchard/index_files/ATSA_DSM.html; 2009. Accessed December, 11, 2014.
- 29.Krueger RB, Kaplan MS. Paraphilic diagnoses in DSM-5. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2012; 49(4).Google Scholar
- 30.Joyal CC, Cossette A, Lapierre V. What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? J Sex Med 2014Google Scholar
- 31.Ogas O, Gaddam S. A billion wicked thoughts: what the Internet tells us about sexual relationships. Penguin; 2011.Google Scholar
- 32.James EL. Fifty shades of grey: Random House; 2012.Google Scholar
- 33.Donahue, D. (2012, August 30). Publishing world is turned on by fifty shades of grey. Retrieved December 13, 2014, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/books/news/story/2012-08-29/erotica-trend-fifty-shades-of-grey/57416594/1.
- 34.Sax, D. (2012, May 24) The ‘fifty shades of grey’ stimulus. Retrieved December 13, 2014, from http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-05-24/the-fifty-shades-of-grey-stimulus.
- 35.•Moser C. Yet another paraphilia definition fails. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(3):483–5. This article is of importance because it carefully parses Blanchard’s proposed DSM-5’s definition of a paraphilia, which, with slight rewording, was essentially reproduced in the DSM-5. Moser shows that the definition fails to provide a coherent distinction between paraphilia and normophilia.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Blaustein M. May 30, 2013 | 6:44 pm Whips, chains and full of life: BDSM practitioners ‘healthier and less neurotic’ than ‘vanilla’ peers. (2013, May 30). Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://nypost.com/2013/05/30/whips-chains-and-full-of-life-bdsm-practitioners-healthier-and-less-neurotic-than-vanilla-peers/.
- 43.Pappas, S. (2013, May 29). Bondage benefits: BDSM practitioners healthier than ‘vanilla’ people. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://www.livescience.com/34832-bdsm-healthy-psychology.html.
- 44.Gray, E. (2013, June 5). BDSM correlated with better mental health, says study. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/bdsm-better-mental-health-study_n_3390676.html.
- 45.••Wismeijer AA, Assen MA. Psychological characteristics of BDSM practitioners. J Sex Med. 2013;10(8):1943–52. This article is of importance because its comparison of BDSM practitioners and a control group found that the psychological profile of BDSM practitioners was healthy and balanced. Major newspapers picked up the study because it also revealed that BDSM practitioners have some psychological strengths and advantages over non-BDSM practitioners.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Faccio E, Casini C, Cipolletta S. Forbidden games: the construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM ‘players’. Culture, health & sexuality 2014(ahead-of-print):1–13.Google Scholar
- 48.•Hébert A, Weaver A. An examination of personality characteristics associated with BDSM orientations. Can J Hum Sex. 2014;23(2):106–15. This study is important because it compared personality characteristics between dominants and submissives, groups that are normally lumped together in studies of BDSM practitioners.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Kleinplatz P, Moser C. Toward clinical guidelines for working with BDSM clients. Contemp Sex. 2004;38(6):1.Google Scholar
- 51.Barker M, Iantaf A, Gupta C. Kinky clients, kinky counselling? Feeling queer or queer feelings?: radical approaches to counselling sex, sexualities and genders. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 106–24.Google Scholar
- 52.Barker M. Turning the world upside down: developing a tool for training about SM. In: Langdridge D, Barker M, editors. Safe, sane and consensual: contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 261–70.Google Scholar
- 54.•Nichols M. Couples and kinky sexuality: the need for a new therapeutic approach. Critical Topics in Family Therapy: Springer; 2014. p. 139–149. This paper is important because it outlines clinical issues that a therapist might confront when working with BDSM clients. Google Scholar
- 57.Pillai-Friedman S, Pollitt J, Castaldo A. Becoming kink-aware—a necessity for sexuality professionals. Sex Relationsh Ther 2014(ahead-of-print):1–15.Google Scholar
- 58.The Kink Aware Professionals Directory: https://ncsfreedom.org/key-programs/kink-aware-professionals/kap-program-page.html. Accessed December 28, 2014.
- 60.Pope KS, Vasquez MJT. Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: a practical guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.Google Scholar
- 61.Hoff G, Sprott RA. Therapy experiences of clients with BDSM sexualities: listening to a stigmatized sexuality. Electron J Hum Sex. 2009;12(9):30.Google Scholar
- 63.Barker M, Gupta C, Iantaffi A. The power of play: the potentials and pitfalls in healing narratives of BDSM. In: Langbridge D, Barker M, editors. Safe, sane and consensual: contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. London: Palgrave; 2007. p. 197–216.Google Scholar
- 64.Henkin WA, Langdridge D, Barker M. Some beneficial aspects of exploring personas and role play in the BDSM context. In: Langbridge D, Barker M, editors. Safe, sane and consensual: contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. London: Palgrave; 2007. p. 229–40.Google Scholar
- 65.Easton D, Hardy JW. Radical ecstasy: SM journeys to transcendence. Greenery: Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 66.Easton D. Shadowplay: S/M journeys to our selves. In: Langbridge D, Barker M, editors. Safe, sane and consensual: contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. London: Palgrave; 2007. p. 217–28.Google Scholar