Current Sexual Health Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 94–105

The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the ‘Pornography Addiction’ Model

CURRENT CONTROVERSIES (PJ KLEINPLATZ AND C MOSER, SECTION EDITORS)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Current Controversies

Abstract

The addiction model is rarely used to describe high-frequency use of visual sexual stimuli (VSS) in research, yet common in media and clinical practice. The theory and research behind ‘pornography addiction’ is hindered by poor experimental designs, limited methodological rigor, and lack of model specification. The history and limitations of addiction models are reviewed, including how VSS fails to meet standards of addiction. These include how VSS use can reduce health-risk behaviors. Proposed negative effects, including erectile problems, difficulty regulating sexual feelings, and neuroadaptations are discussed as non-pathological evidence of learning. Individuals reporting ‘addictive’ use of VSS could be better conceptualized by considering issues such as gender, sexual orientation, libido, desire for sensation, with internal and external conflicts influenced by religiosity and desire discrepancy. Since a large, lucrative industry has promised treatments for pornography addiction despite this poor evidence, scientific psychologists are called to declare the emperor (treatment industry) has no clothes (supporting evidence). When faced with such complaints, clinicians are encouraged to address behaviors without conjuring addiction labels.

Keywords

Pornography addiction Pornography addiction model Visual sexual stimulus (VSS) Libido Sensation-seeking Erectile dysfunction Addiction model Impulsivity Compulsivity 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Coleman E. Sexual compulsivity: definition, etiology, and treatment considerations. J Chem Depend Treat. 1987;1(1):189–204.Google Scholar
  2. 2.••
    Mudry TE, Hodgins DC, el-Guebaly N, Wild TC, Colman I, Patten SB, et al. Conceptualizing excessive behaviour syndromes: a systematic review. Curr Psychiatr Rev. 2011;7(2):138–51. doi:10.2174/157340011796391201. An extensive review of numerous attempts to classify excessive behaviors as disorders. Highlights the many methodological problems and limited data in these areas.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein DJ, Black DW, Pienaar W. Sexual disorders not otherwise specified: compulsive, addictive, or impulsive? CNS Spectr. 2000;5(1):60–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kor A, Fogel YA, Reid RC, Potenza MN. Should hypersexual disorder be classified as an addiction? Sex Addict Comp. 2013;20(1–2):27–47. doi:10.1080/10720162.2013.768132.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benton D. The plausibility of sugar addiction and its role in obesity and eating disorders. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(3):288–303. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziauddeen H, Farooqi IS, Fletcher PC. Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(4):279–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2001;17(2):187–95. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker M. Some problems with the concept of “gambling addiction”: should theories of addiction be generalized to include excessive gambling? J Gambl Stud. 1989;5(3):179–200. doi:10.1007/bf01024386.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McFall RM. Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. Clin Psychol. 1991;44:75–88.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Hook JN, Garos S, Manning JC, Gilliland R, et al. Report of findings in a DSM-5 field trial for hypersexual disorder. J Sex Med. 2012;9(11):2868–77. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02936.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gewirtz P. On “I know it when I see it”. Yale Law J. 1996;105(4):1023–47.Google Scholar
  12. 12.••
    Brown JD, L’Engle KL. X-rated: sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Commun Res. 2009;36(1):129–51. doi:10.1177/0093650208326465. In a rare longitudinal data set, the authors try to separate the effects of VSS viewing from individual differences. Sensation seeking in children may drive them to seek VSS that further increase sexual behaviors associated with high sensation seeking.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carnes P, Schneider JP. Recognition and management of addictive sexual disorders: guide for the primary care clinician. Lippincott’s Prim Care Pract. 2000;4(3):302–18.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simons RF, Detenber BH, Roedema TM, Reiss JE. Emotion processing in three systems: the medium and the message. Psychophysiology. 1999;36(5):619–27. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3650619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Courtney CG, Dawson ME, Schell AM, Iyer A, Parsons TD. Better than the real thing: eliciting fear with moving and static computer-generated stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;78(2):107–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.06.028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith ME, Gevins A. Attention and brain activity while watching television: components of viewer engagement. Media Psychol. 2004;6(3):285–305. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0603_3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prause N, Staley C, Roberts V. Frontal alpha asymmetry and sexually motivated states. Psychophysiology. 2014. doi:10.1111/psyp.12173.
  18. 18.
    Buzzell T. Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sex Cult. 2005;9(1):28–48. doi:10.1007/bf02908761.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rainie L, Pew Research Center. Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics: Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2010. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Internet-broadband-and-cell-phone-statistics.aspx.
  20. 20.
    Wright P, Bae S, Funk M. United States women and pornography through four decades: exposure, attitudes, behaviors, individual differences. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(7):1131–44. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0116-y.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krcmar M, Farrar K, McGloin R. The effects of video game realism on attention, retention and aggressive outcomes. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(1):432–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.005.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carnes P. Don’t call it love: recovery from sexual addiction. New York: Bantam; 1991.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Skegg K, Nada-Raja S, Dickson N, Paul C. Perceived “out of control” sexual behavior in a cohort of young adults from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(4):968–78. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9504-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watson MA, Smith RD. Positive porn: educational, medical, and clinical uses. Am J Sex Educ. 2012;7(2):122–45. doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.680861.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKee A. The positive and negative effects of pornography as attributed by consumers. Aust J Commun. 2007;34(1):87–104.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hald GM, Malamuth NM. Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(4):614–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Häggström-Nordin E, Hanson U, Tydén T. Associations between pornography consumption and sexual practices among adolescents in Sweden. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16(2):102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Štulhofer A, Buško V, Landripet I. Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(1):168–78. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9387-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weinberg MS, Williams CJ, Kleiner S, Irizarry Y. Pornography, normalization, and empowerment. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(6):1389–401. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9592-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peterson Z, Janssen E. Ambivalent affect and sexual response: the impact of co-occurring positive and negative emotions on subjective and physiological sexual responses to erotic stimuli. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36:793–807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prause N, Staley C, Fong T. No evidence of emotion dysregulation in “hypersexuals” reporting their emotions to a sexual film. Sex Addict Comp. 2013;20:106–26. doi:10.1080/10720162.2013.772874.
  32. 32.•
    Diamond M. Pornography, public acceptance and sex related crime: a review. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(5):304–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.06.004. Review which challenges many assumptions regarding pornography use and sexual crime.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brannigan A, Kapardis A. The controversy over pornography and sex crimes: the criminological evidence and beyond. Aust N Z J Criminol. 1986;19(4):259–84. doi:10.1177/000486588601900406.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kutchinsky B. The effect of easy availability of pornography on the incidence of sex crimes: the Danish experience. J Soc Issues. 1973;29(3):163–81. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00094.x.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baron RA, Bell PA. Sexual arousal and aggression by males: effects of type of erotic stimuli and prior provocation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35(2):79–87. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.•
    O’Brien CP, Volkow N, Li TK. What’s In a word? Addiction versus dependence in DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(5):764–5. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.764. Useful exploration of the use and misuse of the word “addiction”.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hasin DS, O’Brien CP, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A, et al. DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(8):834–51. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Petry NM, Blanco C, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Crowley TJ, et al. An overview of and rationale for changes proposed for pathological gambling in DSM-5. J Gambl Stud. 2013. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9370-0.
  39. 39.
    Stepney R. The concept of addiction: its use and abuse in the media and science. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 1996;11(S1):S15–20.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Drew LR. Beyond the disease concept of addiction: drug use as a way of life leading to predicaments. J Drug Issues. 1986;16(2):263–74.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walker MB. Some problems with the concept of “gambling addiction”: should theories of addiction be generalized to include excessive gambling? J Gambl Stud. 1989;5(3):179–200. doi:10.1007/bf01024386.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wood R. Problems with the concept of video game “addiction”: some case study examples. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2008;6(2):169–78. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9118-0.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koob GF, Le Moal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(2):97–129. doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(00)00195-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive–sensitization view. Addiction. 2000;95(8s2):91–117. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.8s2.19.x.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(10):1642–52.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kalivas PW, O’Brien C. Drug addiction as a pathology of staged neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(1):166–80. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smith DE. Editor’s note: the process addictions and the new ASAM definition of addiction. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012;44(1):1–4. doi:10.1080/02791072.2012.662105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fong TW, Reid RC, Parhami I. Behavioral addictions: where to draw the lines? Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2012;35(2):279–96. doi:10.1002/cpp.609.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Orford J. Addiction as excessive appetite. Addiction. 2001;96(1):15–31. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961152.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Short MB, Black L, Smith AH, Wetterneck CT, Wells DE. A review of Internet pornography use research: methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(1):13–23. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.••
    Döring NM. The Internet’s impact on sexuality: a critical review of 15 years of research. Comput Hum Behav. 2009;25(5):1089–101. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.003. Review of research on Internet and sexuality, underscoring methodological issues inherent in these studies.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Steele V, Staley C, Fong T, Prause N. Sexual desire, not hypersexuality, is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2013. http://www.socioaffectiveneuroscipsychol.net/index.php/snp/article/view/20770. Accessed 7 Feb 2014.
  53. 53.
    Griffiths M. Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychol Behav. 2000;3(2):211–8. doi:10.1089/109493100316067.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chudasama Y, Passetti F, Rhodes SEV, Lopian D, Desai A, Robbins TW. Dissociable aspects of performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate, infralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex in the rat: differential effects on selectivity, impulsivity and compulsivity. Behav Brain Res. 2003;146(1–2):105–19. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moran CC. Short-term mood change, perceived funniness, and the effect of humor stimuli. Behav Med. 1996;22(1):32–8. doi:10.1080/08964289.1996.9933763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schnarrs PW, Rosenberger JG, Satinsky S, Brinegar E, Stowers J, Dodge B, et al. Sexual compulsivity, the Internet, and sexual behaviors among men in a rural area of the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010;24(9):563–9. doi:10.1089/apc.2010.0117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Storholm E, Fisher D, Napper L, Reynolds G, Halkitis P. Proposing a tentative cut point for the compulsive sexual behavior inventory. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(6):1301–8. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9712-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Coleman E. Masturbation as a means of achieving sexual health. J Psychol Hum Sex. 2003;14(2–3):5–16. doi:10.1300/J056v14n02_02.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Elders MJ. Sex for health and pleasure throughout a lifetime. J Sex Med. 2010;7 Suppl 5:248–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.•
    Wright PJ. U.S. Males and pornography, 1973–2010: consumption, predictors, correlates. J Sex Res. 2013;50(1):60–71. One of the few longitudinal studies examining VSS use, showing unhappiness and lower life satisfaction as moderating variables.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.•
    Capogrosso P, Colicchia M, Ventimiglia E, Castagna G, Clementi MC, Suardi N, et al. One patient out of four with newly diagnosed erectile dysfunction is a young man–worrisome picture from the everyday clinical practice. J Sex Med. 2013;10(7):1833–41. doi:10.1111/jsm.12179. Examination of rates of E.D. in young men, explained by health and life variables.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mialon A, Berchtold A, Michaud PA, Gmel G, Suris JC. Sexual dysfunctions among young men: prevalence and associated factors. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2012;51(1):25–31. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.008.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hagemann JH, Berding G, Bergh S, Sleep DJ, Knapp WH, Jonas U, et al. Effects of visual sexual stimuli and apomorphine SL on cerebral activity in men with erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2003;43(4):412–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Levin RJ. Revisiting post-ejaculation refractory time—what we know and what we do not know in males and in females. J Sex Med. 2009;6(9):2376–89. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01350.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Freund M. Effect of frequency of emission on semen output and an estimate of daily sperm production in man. J Reprod Fertil. 1963;6(2):269–86. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0060269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Magnus Ø, Tollefsrud A, Árbyholm T, Purvis K. Effects of varying the abstinence period in the same individuals on sperm quality. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 1991;26(3):199–203. doi:10.3109/01485019108987644.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Plaud JJ, Martini JR. The respondent conditioning of male sexual arousal. Behav Modif. 1999;23(2):254–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Both S, Laan E, Spiering M, Nilsson T, Oomens S, Everaerd W. Appetitive and aversive classical conditioning of female sexual response. J Sex Med. 2008;5(6):1386–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hoffmann H, Janssen E, Turner SL. Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(1):43–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.•
    Pfaus JG, Erickson KA, Talianakis S. Somatosensory conditioning of sexual arousal and copulatory behavior in the male rat: A model of fetish development. Physiol Behav. 2013;122:1–7. A model for the development of sexual preferences is described. The possible relevance to humans shaped by sexual experiencesis outlined.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Both S, Laan E, Everaerd W. Focusing “hot” or focusing “cool”: attentional mechanisms in sexual arousal in men and women. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):167–79. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02051.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Conaglen H, Evans I. Pictorial cues and sexual desire: an experimental approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):197–212.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Koukounas E, Over R. Changes in the magnitude of the eyeblink startle response during habituation of sexual arousal. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(6):573–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Laan E, Everaerd W. Habituation of female sexual arousal to slides and film. Arch Sex Behav. 1995;24(5):517–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Carretiè L, Hinojosa JA, Mercado F. Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli. Psychophysiology. 2003;40(3):381–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Winters J, Christoff K, Gorzalka BB. Conscious regulation of sexual arousal in men. J Sex Res. 2009;46(4):330–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Moholy M, Staley C, Prause N. Experimental and first functional neuro studies of the sex addiction model. International Academy of Sex Research Annual Meeting. Chicago: IL; 2013.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Reid RC, Karim R, McCrory E, Carpenter BN. Self-reported differences on measures of executive function and hypersexual behavior in a patient and community sample of men. Int J Neurosci. 2010;120(2):120–7. doi:10.3109/00207450903165577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Reid RC, Garos S, Carpenter BN, Coleman E. A surprising finding related to executive control in a patient sample of hypersexual men. J Sex Med. 2011;8(8):2227–36. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02314.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Twohig MP, Crosby JM, Cox JM. Viewing internet pornography: for whom is it problematic, how, and why? Sex Addict Compul. 2009;16(4):253–66. doi:10.1080/10720160903300788.Google Scholar
  81. 81.•
    Winters J, Christoff K, Gorzalka BB. Dysregulated sexuality and high sexual desire: distinct constructs? Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(5):1029–43. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9591-6. Empirical study with self-identified sex addicts, underscoring role of religious values and sexual desire in the identification of problematic sexual behaviors.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ross M, Månsson S-A, Daneback K. Prevalence, severity, and correlates of problematic sexual internet use in Swedish men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(2):459–66. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9762-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wright PJ. U.S. males and pornography, 1973-2010: consumption, predictors, correlates. J Sex Res. 2013;50(1):60–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Vrana SR, Spence EL, Lang PJ. The startle probe response: a new measure of emotion? J Abnorm Psychol. 1988;97(4):487–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Weinberg A, Hajcak G. Beyond good and evil: the time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content. Emotion. 2010;10(6):767–82. doi:10.1037/a0020242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kühn S, Gallinat J. A quantitative meta-analysis on cue-induced male sexual arousal. J Sex Med. 2011;8(8):2269–75. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02322.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bocher M, Chisin R, Parag Y, Freedman N, Meir Weil Y, Lester H, et al. Cerebral activation associated with sexual arousal in response to a pornographic clip: A 15O-H2O PET study in heterosexual men. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1 Pt 1):105–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Georgiadis JR, Kortekaas R, Kuipers R, Nieuwenburg A, Pruim J, Reinders AATS, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow changes associated with clitorally induced orgasm in healthy women. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24(11):3305–16. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05206.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wehrum S, Klucken T, Kagerer S, Walter B, Hermann A, Vaitl D, et al. Gender commonalities and differences in the neural processing of visual sexual stimuli. J Sex Med. 2013;10(5):1328–42. doi:10.1111/jsm.12096.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18(3):247–91. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, et al. Reward deficicency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32(Suppl):1–68.Google Scholar
  92. 92.•
    Georgiadis JR, Kringelbach ML. The human sexual response cycle: brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Prog Neurobiol. 2012;98(1):49–81. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.004. Review of neurobiological research, indicating that sexual response and desires are not neurologically distinct from other nonsexual likes and desires.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Moser C. Hypersexual disorder: just more muddled thinking. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):227–9. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9690-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.•
    Hillman CH, Cuthbert BN, Cauraugh J, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Psychophysiological responses of sport fans. Motivation & Emotion. 2000;24(1):13–28. Study demonstrating neurological effects of interest and prefernces for nonsexual stimuli.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gable PA, Harmon-Jones E. Relative left frontal activation to appetitive stimuli: considering the role of individual differences. Psychophysiology. 2008;45(2):275–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schaefer M, Knuth M, Rumpel F. Striatal response to favorite brands as a function of neuroticism and extraversion. Brain Res. 2011;1425:83–9. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Demos KE, Heatherton TF, Kelley WM. Individual differences in nucleus accumbens activity to food and sexual images predict weight gain and sexual behavior. J Neurosci. 2012;32(16):5549–52. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5958-11.2012.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Fjell AM, Aker M, Bang KH, Bardal J, Frogner H, Gangås OS, et al. Habituation of P3a and P3b brain potentials in men engaged in extreme sports. Biol Psychol. 2007;75(1):87–94. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.12.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Salamone JD, Correa M. Dopamine and food addiction: Lexicon Badly Needed. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(9):e15–24. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Arnow BA, Millheiser L, Garrett A, Lake Polan M, Glover GH, Hill KR, et al. Women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder compared to normal females: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience. 2009;158(2):484–502. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Fonteille V, Stoléru S. The cerebral correlates of sexual desire: functional neuroimaging approach. Sexologies. 2011;20(3):142–8. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2010.03.011.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Pihl RO, Peterson J, Finn PR. Inherited predisposition to alcoholism: characteristics of sons of male alcoholics. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990;99(3):291–301. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.99.3.291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Harden KP. Genetic influences on adolescent sexual behavior: why genes matter for environmentally oriented researchers. Psychol Bull. 2013. doi:10.1037/a0033564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Dawood K, Kirk KM, Bailey JM, Andrews PW, Martin NG. Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005;8(1):27–33. doi:10.1375/1832427053435427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Dunn KM, Cherkas LF, Spector TD. Genetic influences on variation in female orgasmic function: a twin study. Biol Lett. 2005;1(3):260–3. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0308.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Grueter BA, Robison AJ, Neve RL, Nestler EJ, Malenka RC. ∆FosB differentially modulates nucleus accumbens direct and indirect pathway function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(5):1923–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221742110.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wong CCY, Mill J, Fernandes C. Drugs and addiction: an introduction to epigenetics. Addiction. 2011;106(3):480–9. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03321.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Teegarden SL, Scott AN, Bale TL. Early life exposure to a high fat diet promotes long-term changes in dietary preferences and central reward signaling. Neuroscience. 2009;162(4):924–32. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.029.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Pitchers KK, Frohmader KS, Vialou V, Mouzon E, Nestler EJ, Lehman MN, et al. ΔFosB in the nucleus accumbens is critical for reinforcing effects of sexual reward. Genes Brain Behav. 2010;9(7):831–40. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00621.x.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Watanabe H, Henriksson R, Ohnishi YN, Ohnishi YH, Harper C, Sheedy D, et al. HUMAN STUDY: FOSB proteins in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices of human alcoholics. Addict Biol. 2009;14(3):294–7. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00155.x.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Pettit M. The queer life of a lab rat. Hist Psychol. 2012;15(3):217–27. doi:10.1037/a0027269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Theta Wellness Centers. Theta Advanced Technology Menu. 2013. http://www.thetawellnesscenter.com/medical-research/theta-medical-research-studies-drug-abuse-in-utah.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2013.
  113. 113.
    Bostwick JM, Bucci JA. Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(2):226–30. doi:10.4065/83.2.226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Dalley Jeffrey W, Everitt Barry J, Robbins TW. Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron. 2011;69(4):680–94. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Reay B, Attwood N, Gooder C. Inventing sex: the short history of sex addiction. Sex Cult. 2013;17(1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9136-3.Google Scholar
  116. 116.•
    Grant JE, Kim SW. Brain circuitry of compulsivity and impulsivity. CNS Spectr. 2013;1–7. doi:10.1017/S109285291300028X. The differences between compulsivity and impulsivity models are reviewed. The relevance of these concepts to addiction models is discussed.
  117. 117.
    Reid R. No more disposition to do evil [Audio CD]: Cedar Fort. 2008.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Hilton DL. He restoreth my soul: understanding and breaking the chemical and spiritual chains of pornography through the atonement of Jesus Christ. 3rd ed. LLC: Forward Press Publishing; 2011.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Weiss R. 101 Freedom exercises: a Christian guide for sex addiction recovery. Los Angeles, CA: Discovery Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Cantor J, Klein C, Lykins A, Rullo J, Thaler L, Walling B. A treatment-oriented typology of self-identified hypersexuality referrals. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(5):883–93. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0085-1.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Dabbs Jr JM, Bassett JF, Dyomina NV. The palm IAT: a portable version of the implicit association task. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp J Psychon Soc Inc. 2003;35(1):90–5.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Svedin CG, Akerman I, Priebe G. Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. J Adolesc. 2011;34(4):779–88. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Schächtle U, Schöler T, Altstötter-Gleich C. Watching pornographic pictures on the internet: role of sexual arousal ratings and psychological–psychiatric symptoms for using internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14(6):371–7. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0222.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Cooper A, Griffin-Shelley E, Delmonico DL, Mathy RM. Online sexual problems: assessment and predictive variables. Sex Addict Compul Spec Issue Prepar DSM-V. 2001;8(3):267–85.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Peter J, Valkenburg PM. The use of sexually explicit material and its antecedents: a longitudinal comparison of adolescents and adults. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(5):1015–25. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9644-x.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Yoder KK, Morris ED, Constantinescu CC, Cheng T-E, Normandin MD, O’Connor SJ, et al. When what you see isn’t what you get: alcohol cues, alcohol administration, prediction error, and human Striatal dopamine. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33(1):139–49. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00821.x.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Griffiths MD. Internet sex addiction: a review of empirical research. Addict Res Theory. 2012;20(2):111–24. doi:10.1037/0893-164x.18.3.223.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Gilliland R, Karim R. Problems of self-concept in a patient sample of hypersexual men with attention-deficit disorder. J Addict Med. 2011;5(2):134–40. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e6ad32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Gable PA, Adams DL. Nonaffective motivation modulates the sustained LPP (1,000–2,000 ms). Psychophysiology. 2013;50(12):1251–4. doi:10.1111/psyp.12135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Pripfl J, Neumann R, Köhler U, Lamm C. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on risky decision making are mediated by ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ decisions, personality, and hemisphere. Eur J Neurosci. 2013:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/ejn.12375.
  131. 131.
    Rupp H, Librach G, Feipel N, Ketterson E, Sengelaub D, Heiman J. Partner status influences women’s interest in the opposite sex. Hum Nat. 2009;20(1):93–104. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Davies S, Katz J, Jackson JL. Sexual desire discrepancies: effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28(6):553–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Nongpiur A, Sinha VK, Praharaj SK, Goyal N. Theta-patterned, frequency-modulated priming stimulation enhances low-frequency, right prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in depression: a randomized, sham-controlled study. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(3):348–57. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.23.3.348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Izzo AA, Piscitelli F, Capasso R, Aviello G, Romano B, Borrelli F, et al. Peripheral endocannabinoid dysregulation in obesity: relation to intestinal motility and energy processing induced by food deprivation and re-feeding. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158(2):451–61. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00183.x.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Cooper A, Galbreath N, Becker MA. Sex on the internet: furthering our understanding of men with online sexual problems. Psychol Addict Behav. 2004;18(3):223–30. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.3.223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Laier C, Schulte FP, Brand M. Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance. J Sex Res. 2012; doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.716873.
  137. 137.
    Kalisch R, Wiech K, Herrmann K, Dolan RJ. Neural correlates of self-distraction from anxiety and a process model of cognitive emotion regulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(8):1266–76. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1266.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    McRae K, Hughes B, Chopra S, Gabrieli JDE, Gross JJ, Ochsner KN. The neural bases of distraction and reappraisal. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010;22(2):248–62. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Sheppes G, Catran E, Meiran N. Reappraisal (but not distraction) is going to make you sweat: physiological evidence for self-control effort. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;71(2):91–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.06.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Steele V, Prause N, Staley C, Fong GW. Sexual desire, not hypersexuality, is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2013;3:20770. doi:10.3402/snp.v3i0.20770.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Petrican R, Burris CT, Moscovitch M. Shame, sexual compulsivity, and eroticizing flirtatious others: an experimental study. J Sex Res. 2013:1-12. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.829796.
  142. 142.
    Cooper A, Delmonico DL, Burg R. Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 2000;7(1–2):5–29. doi:10.1080/10720160008400205.
  143. 143.
    Thomsen R, Soltis J. Male masturbation in free-ranging japanese macaques. Int J Primatol. 2004;25(5):1033–41. doi:10.1023/b:ijop.0000043350.75897.89.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Borbély AA, Baumann F, Brandeis D, Strauch I, Lehmann D. Sleep deprivation: effect on sleep stages and EEG power density in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981;51(5):483–93. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(81)90225-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Polivy J, Herman CP. Dieting and binging: a causal analysis. Am Psychol. 1985;40(2):193–201. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Raffaelli M, Crockett LJ. Sexual risk taking in adolescence: the role of self-regulation and attraction to risk. Dev Psychol. 2003;39(6):1036–46. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Wetterneck CT, Burgess AJ, Short MB, Smith AH, Cervantes ME. The role of sexual compulsivity, impulsivity, and experiential avoidance in internet pornography use. Psychol Rec. 2012;62(1):3–17.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Paul B. Predicting internet pornography use and arousal: the role of individual difference variables. J Sex Res. 2009;46(4):344–57. doi:10.1080/00224490902754152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Miner MH, Raymond N, Mueller BA, Lloyd M, Lim KO. Preliminary investigation of the impulsive and neuroanatomical characteristics of compulsive sexual behavior. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2009;174(2):146–51.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Prause N, Steele VR, Staley C, Sabatinelli D, Hajcak G, Fong T. Neural evidence of underreactivity to sexual stimuli in those reporting problems regulating their viewing of visual sexual stimuli. 2013. manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Davis FC, Knodt AR, Sporns O, Lahey BB, Zald DH, Brigidi BD, et al. Impulsivity and the modular organization of resting-state neural networks. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23(6):1444–52. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Odlaug BL, Chamberlain SR, Schreiber LRN, Grant JE. Where on the obsessive impulsive–compulsive spectrum does hair-pulling sisorder belong? Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2013;17(4):279–85. doi:10.3109/13651501.2013.828079.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Sinković M, Štulhofer A, Božić J. Revisiting the association between pornography use and risky sexual behaviors: the role of early exposure to pornography and sexual sensation seeking. J Sex Res. 2012;50(7):633–41. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.681403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Seigfried-Spellar KC, Rogers MK. Does deviant pornography use follow a Guttman-like progression? Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(5):1997–2003. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.018.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Bavelier D, Davidson RJ. Brain training: games to do you good. Nature. 2013;494(7438):425–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Moser C. Hypersexual disorder: searching for clarity. Sex Addict Comp. 2013;20:48–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New Mexico SolutionsAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations