Advertisement

Current Rheumatology Reports

, 15:305 | Cite as

Low Back Pain and Lumbar Spine Osteoarthritis: How Are They Related?

  • Adam P. Goode
  • Timothy S. Carey
  • Joanne M. Jordan
CHRONIC PAIN (LJ CROFFORD, SECTION EDITOR)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Chronic Pain

Abstract

Lumbar spine osteoarthritis (OA) is very common, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 40–85 %. The process of degeneration of the spine has commonly been classified as OA (disc space narrowing together with vertebral osteophyte formation); however, anatomically, the facet joint is the only synovial joint in the spine that has a similar pathological degenerative process to appendicular joints. Low back pain (LBP) is also a common condition, with nearly 80 % of Americans experiencing at least one episode of LBP in their lifetime. The complex relationship between spine radiographs and LBP has many clinical and research challenges. Specific conservative treatments for spine degeneration have not been established; there has, however, been recent interest in use of exercise therapy, because of some moderate benefits in treating chronic LBP. An understanding of the relationship between spine degeneration and LBP may be improved with further population-based research in the areas of genetics, biomarkers, and pain pathways.

Keywords

Low back pain Osteoarthritis Spine osteoarthritis Disc space narrowing Intervertebral disc degeneration Vertebral osteophytes Facet joint osteoarthritis Epidemiology Treatment Risk factors Prevalence Gender Race 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr Goode is supported by the NIH Loan Repayment Program, the National Institute of Arthritis Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1-L30-AR057661-01), and by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) K-12 Comparative Effectiveness Career Development Award grant number HS19479-01. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAMS or AHRQ.

The authors would like to thank Holly R. Thompson, BA, for her careful editing of the manuscript.

Disclosure

Dr Goode has received grant support from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Dr Carey has served as a consultant for Blue Cross and the Blue Shield Association. Dr Jordan has received grant support from Johnson and Johnson, has received honoraria from LEK Consulting and Marston Consulting, holds stock options in Algynomics, and has had travel and/or accommodation expenses covered and/or reimbursed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International and the Arthritis Foundation.

References

Paper of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance, •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(1):26–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991–94. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2271–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):226–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy DJ, Fredericson M. Introduction. Pm R. 2012;4(5 Suppl):S1–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Battie MC, Videman T, Parent E. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(23):2679–2690.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borenstein D. Does osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine cause chronic low back pain? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2004;6(1):14–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubin DI. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):353–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 2:21–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo HR, Tanaka S, Halperin WE, Cameron LL. Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(7):1029–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ricci JA, Stewart WF, Chee E, Leotta C, Foley K, Hochberg MC. Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers. Spine. 2006;31(26):3052–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2443–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner DK, Haggerty CL, Kritchevsky SB, Harris T, Simonsick EM, Nevitt M, et al. How does low back pain impact physical function in independent, well-functioning older adults? Evidence from the Health ABC Cohort and implications for the future. Pain Med. 2003;4(4):311–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(1):11–19.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(7):586–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross Jr JT, Shekelle P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB. Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1491–1502.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, Jackman AM, Darter JD, Wallace AS, et al. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):251–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carey TS, Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Castel L, Darter J, Agans R, et al. A long way to go: practice patterns and evidence in chronic low back pain care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(7):718–724.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine. 1997;22(4):427–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varlotta GP, Lefkowitz TR, Schweitzer M, Errico TJ, Spivak J, Bendo JA, et al. The lumbar facet joint: a review of current knowledge: part 1: anatomy, biomechanics, and grading. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(1):13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis: a review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;37(2):69–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Videman T, Battie MC, Gill K, Manninen H, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD. Magnetic resonance imaging findings and their relationships in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Insights into the etiopathogenesis of spinal degeneration. Spine. 1995;20(8):928–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Urban JPG, Roberts S, Ralphs JR. The nucleus of the intervertebral disc from development to degeneration. Amer Zool. 2000;40(1):53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eyre DR, Muir H. Quantitative analysis of types I and II collagens in human intervertebral discs at various ages. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;492(1):29–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, et al. The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(4):996–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Menkes CJ, Lane NE. Are osteophytes good or bad? Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2004;12 Suppl A:S53–54.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snodgrass JJ. Sex differences and aging of the vertebral column. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(3):458–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alonge TO, Oni OO. An investigation of the frequency of co-existence of osteophytes and circumscribed full thickness articular surface defects in the knee joint. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000;29(2):151–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boegard T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K. Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(7):401–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Suri P, Miyakoshi A, Hunter DJ, Jarvik JG, Rainville J, Guermazi A, et al. Does lumbar spinal degeneration begin with the anterior structures? A study of the observed epidemiology in a community-based population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:202. This was an ancillary study using data from the Framingham Heart Study to determine if the anterior structures of the spine degenerate in sequence to the posterior structures of the spine. For most participants, anterior structure degeneration occurred before posterior; however, there were cases of posterior structure degeneration in isolation of anterior structures, suggesting that facet joint OA may occur without intervertebral disc degeneration. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nuki G. Osteoarthritis: a problem of joint failure. Z Rheumatol. 1999;58(3):142–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Muraki S, Akune T, Oka H, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Yoshida M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for radiographic lumbar spondylosis and lower back pain in Japanese men and women: the ROAD study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(7):712–718. This is one of few longitudinal studies aimed at determining the incidence of lumbar spondylosis changes and risk factors for progression. Findings from this study indicate an overall high proportion of Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) graded lumbar spondylosis. The incidence of K-L ≥ 2 was greater among men, as was the progression of lumbar spondylosis. Severe K-L grade at baseline was significantly associated with the incidence of low back pain. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hassett G, Hart DJ, Manek NJ, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Risk factors for progression of lumbar spine disc degeneration: the Chingford Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(11):3112–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    •• de Schepper EI, Damen J, van Meurs JB, Ginai AZ, Popham M, Hofman A, et al. The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain: the influence of age, gender, and individual radiographic features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(5):531–536. This is the largest population-based study describing the prevalence and associations with low back pain of individual radiographic features of disc space narrowing and vertebral osteophytes. Their findings indicate a significant association between disc space narrowing and vertebral osteophytes and low back pain. However, the associations with vertebral osteophytes were small and have not been replicated in other studies. This is also the first study to determine the relationship between spine radiographic features and physical function with some associations being stronger than with low back pain alone. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    •• Goode A, Marshall, SW, Renner, JB, Carey, TS, Kraus, VB, Irwin, DE, Sturmer, T, Jordan, JM. Lumbar spine radiographic features and demographic, clinical and concomitant knee, hip and hand OA: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project [in press]. Arthritis Care Res. 2012. This is the only community-based study in the US of spine radiographic features and their relationship between hip, knee, and hand OA and low back symptoms. Only disc space narrowing was significantly associated with low back symptoms. Associations differed by appendicular joint OA with significant associations between facet joint OA and knee and hand OA, but no associations between disc space narrowing and knee or hand OA. No radiographic feature in the spine was associated with hip OA. This was also the first study to determine that associations between spine radiographic features differed by race. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muraki S, Oka H, Akune T, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, et al. Prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis and its association with low back pain in elderly subjects of population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(9):1401–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pye SR, Reid DM, Smith R, Adams JE, Nelson K, Silman AJ, et al. Radiographic features of lumbar disc degeneration and self-reported back pain. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(4):753–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, et al. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(1):95–103.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kalichman L, Li L, Kim DH, Guermazi A, Berkin V, O’Donnell CJ, et al. Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population. Spine. 2008;33(23):2560–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    •• Scheele J, de Schepper EI, van Meurs JB, Hofman A, Koes BW, Luijsterburg PA, et al. Association between spinal morning stiffness and lumbar disc degeneration: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2012. This study is the first to describe the involvement of morning stiffness in combination with low back pain among those with spine degeneration. The associations between self reported morning stiffness in conjunction with low back symptoms were stronger than self reported low back pain alone. These findings are of particular importance because self-reported low back pain has only had modest associations with spine degeneration. Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Symmons DP, van Hemert AM, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. II. Radiographic findings. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50(3):162–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Symmons DP, van Hemert AM, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. I. Clinical findings. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50(3):158–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bigos SJ, Holland J, Holland C, Webster JS, Battie M, Malmgren JA. High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults. Spine J. 2009;9(2):147–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Buchbinder R, Pransky G, Hayden J. Recent advances in the evaluation and management of nonspecific low back pain and related disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):147–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(3):CD000335.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):492–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    •• Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Wellman RD, Cook AJ, Hawkes RJ, Delaney K, et al. A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):2019–2026. This randomized clinical trial examined stretching, yoga, and self-care books for primary care patients. Although not specific to spine degeneration, these findings indicate that yoga was more effective than self-care books but no more effective than stretching classes for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Both types of intervention resulted in improved symptoms and increased physical function with benefits lasting for several months. These results support several other reports that some exercise is better than no exercise for low back pain. Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Karppinen J, Shen FH, Luk KD, Andersson GB, Cheung KM, Samartzis D. Management of degenerative disk disease and chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42(4):513–528, viii.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician. 2009;12(1):9–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, Rosenquist RW. Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine. 2009;34(10):1078–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    van Spil WE, DeGroot J, Lems WF, Oostveen JC, Lafeber FP. Serum and urinary biochemical markers for knee and hip-osteoarthritis: a systematic review applying the consensus BIPED criteria. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(5):605–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gruber HE, Hanley EN. Do we need biomarkers for disc degeneration? Biomark Insights. 2007;1:131–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Arlot M, Christiansen C, Delmas PD. Association between spine disc degeneration and type II collagen degradation in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(10):3137–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Meulenbelt I, Kloppenburg M, Kroon HM, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Garnero P, Hellio Le Graverand MP, et al. Urinary CTX-II levels are associated with radiographic subtypes of osteoarthritis in hip, knee, hand, and facet joints in subject with familial osteoarthritis at multiple sites: the GARP study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(3):360–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    •• Goode A, Marshall, SW, Kraus, VB, Renner, JB, Sturmer, T, Carey, TS, Irwin, DE, Jordan, JM. Association between serum and urine biomarkers and individual radiographic features in the spine: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project [in press]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012. This study examined a broad range of urine and serum biomarkers and their associations with either disc space narrowing or vertebral osteophytes. Associations between biomarkers and disc space narrowing were stronger than association of biomarkers with vertebral osteophytes. This is the only study to compare a wide range of biomarkers among those with and without low back symptoms. Interestingly, serum COMP was significantly associated with disc space narrowing among those with low back symptoms but not among those without low back symptoms. Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang Y, Sun Z, Liu J, Guo X. Advances in susceptibility genetics of intervertebral degenerative disc disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2008;4(5):283–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. The genetics of intervertebral disc degeneration. Associated genes. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(4):388–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chan D, Song Y, Sham P, Cheung KM. Genetics of disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 3:S317–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ala-Kokko L. Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med. 2002;34(1):42–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kao PY, Chan D, Samartzis D, Sham PC, Song YQ. Genetics of lumbar disk degeneration: technology, study designs, and risk factors. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42(4):479–486, vii.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Arendt-Nielsen L, Nie H, Laursen MB, Laursen BS, Madeleine P, Simonsen OH, et al. Sensitization in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. Pain. 2010;149(3):573–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, et al. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(10):1424–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Goode A, Shi, XA, Renner, JR, Gracely, R, Maleki-Fischban, M, Jordan, JM. Association Between Pain Threshold, Symptoms and Radiographic Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project [accepted abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 2012.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Giesecke T, Williams DA, Harris RE, Cupps TR, Tian X, Tian TX, et al. Subgrouping of fibromyalgia patients on the basis of pressure-pain thresholds and psychological factors. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(10):2916–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Petzke F, Clauw DJ, Ambrose K, Khine A, Gracely RH. Increased pain sensitivity in fibromyalgia: effects of stimulus type and mode of presentation. Pain. 2003;105(3):403–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, Nachemson A, Petzke F, Williams DA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(2):613–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    O’Neill S, Kjaer P, Graven-Nielsen T, Manniche C, Arendt-Nielsen L. Low pressure pain thresholds are associated with, but does not predispose for, low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(12):2120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam P. Goode
    • 1
  • Timothy S. Carey
    • 2
  • Joanne M. Jordan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Community and Family MedicineDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Thurston Arthritis Research CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations