Advertisement

Current Rheumatology Reports

, 13:543 | Cite as

Web-Based Behavioral Interventions for the Management of Chronic Pain

  • David A. WilliamsEmail author
RHEUMATOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS OF OTHER DISEASES (ROLAND STAUD, SECTION EDITOR)

Abstract

The Internet is rapidly becoming a part of the pain practitioner’s arsenal for bringing relief to patients. Along with the promise come a number of caveats for selecting the most appropriate technologies for a given practice. This article provides an overview of why the Internet holds potential for filling a gap in pain practice, reviews some of the fastest emerging uses of the Internet for pain, and identifies both merits and limitations the practitioner should consider when contemplating adopting an Internet technology for his or her practice.

Keywords

Chronic pain Cognitive-behavioral therapy Behavioral therapy Internet Websites Management Behavioral inventions e-Health 

Notes

Disclosure

Dr. Williams has served as a consultant for Eli Lilly and Company.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    • IOM, Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care Education, and Reserach. 2011, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. This is a recent report from the Institute of Medicine that indicates the growing need for better and cost-effective pain treatments, as well as the importance of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic forms of care. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    • Kroenke, K., E.E. Krebs, and M.J. Bair, Pharmacotherapy of chronic pain: a synthesis of recommendations from systematic reviews. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2009. 31(3): p. 206–19. This is a review that indicates that while there are many pharmacologic interventions available for pain, effects remain modest for most patients. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turk DC. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(6):355–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjordal JM et al. Short-term efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain: a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(2):125–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2010;150(3):573–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulanger A et al. Chronic pain in Canada: have we improved our management of chronic noncancer pain? Pain Res Manag. 2007;12(1):39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loeser JD, Melzack R. Pain: an overview. Lancet. 1999;353(9164):1607–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apkarian AV et al. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(4):463–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams DA, Gracely RH. Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. Functional magnetic resonance imaging findings in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(6):224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):492–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman BM et al. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Glombiewski, J.A., et al., Psychological treatments for fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Pain, 2010. 151(2): p. 280–95. This is a review of current psychological therapies for fibromyalgia, a type of chronic pain. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rossy LA et al. A meta-analysis of fibromyalgia treatment interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(2):180–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keefe FJ et al. Pain coping skills training in the management of osteoarthric knee pain-II: follow-up results. Behav Ther. 1990;21:435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keefe FJ et al. Analyzing pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pain coping strategies in patients who have had knee replacement surgery. Pain. 1991;46(2):153–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keefe FJ, Abernethy AP, Campbell LC. Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:601–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruehl S, Chung OY. Psychological and behavioral aspects of complex regional pain syndrome management. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(5):430–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lorig K et al. A comparison of lay-taught and professional-taught arthritis self-management courses. J Rheumatol. 1986;13(4):763–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brosseau L et al. Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for aerobic fitness exercises in the management of fibromyalgia: part 1. Phys Ther. 2008;88(7):857–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    • Clauw, D.J., Pain management: Fibromyalgia drugs are ‘as good as it gets’ in chronic pain. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2010. 6(8): p. 439–40. This is a review paper in which matching treatment to the mechanism of pain is discussed, as is the importance of including nonpharmacologic modalities with pharmacologic modalities for the best management of pain. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Moore M. Patients’ perceived barriers to active self-management of chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(3):300–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sierpina V et al. Use of mind-body therapies in psychiatry and family medicine faculty and residents: attitudes, barriers, and gender differences. Explore (NY). 2007;3(2):129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smitherman TA, Penzien DB, Rains JC. Challenges of nonpharmacologic interventions in chronic tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007;11(6):471–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Internet_World_Stats. Usage and Population Statistics. [Internet site] 2011 [cited 2011 August 17, 2011]; Available at http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
  25. 25.
    • Rosser, B.A., et al., Technologically-assisted behaviour change: a systematic review of studies of novel technologies for the management of chronic illness. J Telemed Telecare, 2009. 15(7): p. 327–38. This is a review of studies that have advanced the use of e-health technologies for the management of chronic illnesses in general. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Bender, J.L., et al., Can pain be managed through the Internet? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain, 2011. 152(8): p. 1740–50. This is a recent systematic review of Internet interventions for pain from 1990 to 2010 concluding that the Internet delivery of care can reduce pain and distress and improve function, but that additional research is needed. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    • Macea, D.D., et al., The efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioral interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain, 2010. 11(10): p. 917–29. This is a recent review that identifies the benefits as well as the future research directions needed to advance the practice of Web-based CBT in chronic pain. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lorig KR et al. Can a back pain e-mail discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs?: A randomized study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(7):792–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Naylor MR et al. Therapeutic interactive voice response for chronic pain reduction and relapse prevention. Pain. 2008;134(3):335–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Buhrman M et al. Controlled trial of Internet-based treatment with telephone support for chronic back pain. Pain. 2004;111(3):368–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lorig KR et al. The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(4):247–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    • Stinson, J.N., et al., An internet-based self-management program with telephone support for adolescents with arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol, 2010. 37(9): p. 1944–52. This is a randomized controlled trial of an Internet website for the management of arthritis in adolescents. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Palermo, T.M., et al., Randomized controlled trial of an Internet-delivered family cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for children and adolescents with chronic pain. Pain, 2009. 146(1–2): p. 205–13. This is a randomized controlled trial of a well-constructed CBT website for the management of pediatric chronic pain. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chiauzzi E et al. painACTION-back pain: a self-management website for people with chronic back pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(7):1044–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    • Williams, D.A., et al., Internet-enhanced management of fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Pain, 2010. 151(3): p. 694–702. This is a randomized controlled trial of an Internet website for the management of fibromyalgia. Outcomes rivaled or even surpassed the effects of current pharmacologic agents in some domains. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    • Hauser, W., F. Petzke, and C. Sommer, Comparative efficacy and harms of duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain, 2010. 11(6): p. 505–21. This was a comparative study of currently approved drugs for treatment of fibromyalgia in the United States. Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    • Dy, S.M., et al., Tell Us: A Web-based tool for improving communication among patients, families, and providers in hospice and palliative care through systematic data specification, collection, and use. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011. This was a study describing an Internet-based program that facilitates better communication between large health care teams and patients. Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    • Snyder, C.F. and N.K. Aaronson, Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet, 2009. 374(9687): p. 369–70. This paper supports the use of PROs as a viable method of monitoring symptoms over time and informing health care teams of patient status over time. Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Snyder, C.F., et al., PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Qual Life Res, 2009. 18(7): p. 793–800. This paper provides an example of how the Internet can be used to collect PROs for the monitoring of care over time. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    • DuBenske, L.L., et al., Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes. Med Decis Making, 2010. 30(6): p. 732–44. This study described an Internet-based program that facilitates communication between patients and caregivers with multimember health care teams. Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:53–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G. Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2008;31(2):169–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    • Webb, T.L., et al., Using the Internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res, 2010. 12(1): p. e4. This was a systematic review of e-health applications designed to promote behavior change in general. Behavior change is necessary in the management of chronic pain. Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    • Tate, D.F., et al., Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med, 2009. 38(1): p. 40–5. The use of the Internet for e-health can offer cost savings in addition to being effective treatment. While more studies are needed, initial cost benefits appear promising. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    • Keogh, E., B.A. Rosser, and C. Eccleston, e-Health and chronic pain management: current status and developments. Pain, 2010. 151(1): p. 18–21. This is a review of the many modalities of e-health and their potential application to the treatment of chronic pain. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations