Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology
- First Online:
- 55 Downloads
The Delphi Technique and Nominal Group Technique are two well-recognized consensus-formation methodologies specifically designed to combine judgments from a group of experts. The Delphi Technique utilizes a series of well-defined questionnaire-based surveys, whereas Nominal Group Technique is a structured face-to-face meeting designed to facilitate consensus. Consensus-formation techniques require that each step build on the results of the previous steps. In this review, we describe these techniques, how they work, and their practical application in pediatric rheumatology, where they have been widely used to develop the outcome measures of several chronic rheumatic diseases, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, as well as the classification criteria for juvenile systemic sclerosis and juvenile vasculitides.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 1.Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH: Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes, edn 1. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975.Google Scholar
- 2.Dalkey NC: Delphi. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1967.Google Scholar
- 3.Helmer O: Analysis of the Future: the Delphi Method. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1967.Google Scholar
- 12.Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Prieur AM, et al.: Efficacy and safety of abatacept in children and adolescents with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65(Suppl 11):248.Google Scholar
- 13.Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Goodman S, et al.: 48-week data from the study of adalimumab in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65(Suppl 11):56.Google Scholar
- 17.Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al.: Methotrexate in resistant juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results of the U.S.A.-U.S.S.R. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group and the Cooperative Children’s Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:1043–1049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Martini A, Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, et al.: An international consensus conference to define core sets of outcome measures for juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis. Proceedings of the Conference, March 31–April 3, 2001. Pavia, Italy: Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO); 2001.Google Scholar
- 19.Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Cuttica R, et al.: The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the disease activity core set. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2854–2864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, et al.: The provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: a prospective validation study. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 59:4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Oliveira S, et al.: The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization/American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the definition of improvement. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:355–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar