Current Psychiatry Reports

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 179–184

Current developments in psychosocial treatments of alcohol and substance abuse

  • Lynne Siqueland
  • Paul Crits-Christoph


This article reviews recent findings and new developments in alcohol and substance abuse treatment over the past 2 years. Outcome results from two large clinical trials: Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity) for alcohol dependent patients; and the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study for cocaine dependent patients; and the naturalistic Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study have yielded important results on the possibility of patient treatment matching. The promising community reinforcement approaches have been expanded to opiate dependent and homeless populations. Finally, a number of studies point to the important role of self-help groups and the power of 12-step-based treatment approaches.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    National Institute on Drug Abuse Household Survey: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration/Office of Applied Statistics, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al.: Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: Results from the epidemiologic catchment area (ECA) study. JAMA 1990, 264:2511–2518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Project MATCH Research Group: Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997, 58:7–29.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Project MATCH Research Group: Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1998, 59:631–639. Project MATCH found that Twelve Step Facilitation Therapy (TSF) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) had better outcome immediately post-treatment on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related negative consequences than Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) in an outpatient sample of over 700 alcoholic patients. There were no differences among the three treatments on measures of employment, psychologic or social functioning, or on liver functioning. None of the patient-treatment matching hypotheses were confirmed.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Project MATCH Research Group: Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998, 22(6):1300–1311. This paper reports on the 3-year outcome for the Project MATCH study described above. Treatment gains found at 1 year were maintained at 3 years with a slight advantage for TSF on a total abstinence measure. The patient-treatment matching variables of anger and networks supportive of drinking are discussed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Longabaugh RL, Wirtz PW, Zweben A, Stout RL: Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction 1998, 93(9):1313–1333. This paper found that Twelve Step Facilitation Therapy (TSF) was more effective at 3-year outcome than Motivation Enhancement Therapy (MET) for patients with networks supportive of drinking. Patients assigned to TSF attended Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) more, and AA involvement was related to better 3-year drinking outcome.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cisler R, Holder HD, Longabaugh R, Stout RL, Zweben A: Actual and estimated replication costs for alcohol treatment modalities: Case study from project MATCH. J Stud Alcohol 1998, 59:503–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al.: Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999, 56:493–502. This article reports the results of the NIDA Collaborative Cocaine Study, a multi-site randomized clinical trial of psychosocial treatments of 487 patients with DSM-IV cocaine dependence. Individual drug counseling (IDC) plus group drug counseling (GDC) showed significantly better drug use outcome than Cognitive Therapy + GDC or Supportive-Expressive Therapy + GDC or GDC alone despite higher attrition rates for IDC.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, et al.: The NIDA Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study: Rationale and methods. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997, 54:721–726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Woody GE, McLellan AT, Luborsky L, O’Brien CP: Psychotherapy in community-based methadone programs - A validation study. Am J Psychiatry. 1995, 152:1302–1308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woody GE, Luborsky L, McLellan AT, et al.: Psychotherapy for opiate addicts: Does it help? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983, 40:639–645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, et al.: Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. Am J Psychiatry 1993, 150:763–769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maude-Griffin PM, Hohenstein JM, et al.: Superior efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for urban crack cocaine abusers: Main and matching effects. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998, 66:832–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gottheil E, Weinstein SP, Sterling RC, Lundy A, Serota RD: A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of intensive outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence. Psychiatr Serv 1998, 49(6):782–787.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, et al.: A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999, 56:507–514. The national Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Studies (DATOS) assessed a total of 1605 cocaine-dependent patients admitted to long term residential programs, outpatient drug-free programs, and shortterm inpatient programs. Only 23.5% of patients reported weekly cocaine use in the year following discharge from treatment, and reductions were also found in alcohol use and criminal activity. Outcome was related to treatment intensity and level of problem severity.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith JE, Meyers RJ, Delaney HD: The community reinforcement approach with homeless alcohol-dependent individuals. J Cons Clin Psych 1998, 66(3):541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abbott PJ, Weller SB, Delaney HD, Moore BA: Community reinforcement approach in the treatment of opiate addicts. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1998, 24(1):17–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Humphreys K, Huebsch PD, Finney JW, Moos RH: A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999, 23(3):558–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne Siqueland
    • 1
  • Paul Crits-Christoph
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical SchoolPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations