Identification and Management of Domestic and Sexual Violence in Primary Care in the #MeToo Era: an Update
- 11 Downloads
Purpose of Review
We discuss recent evidence around the identification and response to domestic and sexual violence in primary care for perpetrators and victims, in the context of feminist social media movements such as #MeToo.
There is no recent research on identification and response to perpetrators in health settings. There is some limited recent evidence for how health settings can address domestic and sexual violence for female victims and their children. Recent studies of mixed quality focus on advocacy and empowerment, integrated interventions (with alcohol and drug misuse) and couples counselling for domestic violence and cognitive behavioural or processing therapy for sexual violence.
Further research on perpetrator interventions in primary care is urgent. Larger sample sizes and a focus on sexual violence are needed to develop the evidence base for female survivors. Clinicians need to ask about violence and provide a first-line response depending on the patient’s needs.
KeywordsDomestic violence Partner abuse Social media Interventions Health settings
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Kelsey Hegarty and Laura Tarzia declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
- 2.Oram S, Trevillion K, Khalifeh H, Feder G, Howard LM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychiatric disorder and the perpetration of partner violence. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014;23(4):361–76.Google Scholar
- 4.Ayre J, Lum On M, Webster K, Gourley M, Moon L. Examination of the burden of disease of intimate partner violence against women. Sydney: ANROWS; 2016.Google Scholar
- 5.Felitti V, Anda R. The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult medical disease, psychiatric disorders and sexual behaviour: implications for healthcare. In: Lanius R, Vermetten E, Pain C, editors. The impact of early life trauma on health and disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pico-Alfonso MA, Garcia-Linares MI, Celda-Navarro N, Blasco-Ros C, Echeburua E, Martinez M. The impact of physical, psychological, and sexual intimate male partner violence on women’s mental health: depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, state anxiety, and suicide. J Women's Health. 2006;15(5):599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.World Health Organization. Global plan of action to strengthen the role of the health system within a national multisectoral response to address interpersonal violence, in particular against women and girls, and against children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
- 13.United Nations. UN sounds alarm to end ‘global pandemic’ of violence against women. UN News [Internet]. 2014 1/10/18. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/11/484692#.We-gOa2ZOU0.
- 14.Council of Australian Governments. National plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010-2022. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.Google Scholar
- 15.Hawley E, Clifford K, Konkes C. The “Rosie Batty Effect” and the framing of family violence in Australian news media. Journal Stud. 2018;19(5):2304–23.Google Scholar
- 19.Cox P. Violence against women in Australia: Additional analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Personal Safety Survey 2012. ANROWS Horizons: 01/2015. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS); 2015.Google Scholar
- 22.World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
- 23.NICE. Domestic violence and abuse: how health services, social care and the organisations they work with can respond effectively. London: NICE; 2014.Google Scholar
- 24.Hegarty K, Feder G, Ramsay J. Identification of partner abuse in health care settings: should health professionals be screening? In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals. London: Elsevier; 2006. p. 79–92.Google Scholar
- 25.• Tarzia L, Forsdike K, Feder G, Hegarty K. Interventions in health settings for male perpetrators or victims of intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017744772. This systematic review highlights the paucity of robust evidence to support effective identification and response to male perpetrators of DV in health settings.
- 26.Williamson E, Jones S, Ferrari G, Debbonaire T, Feder G, Hester M. Health professionals responding to men for safety (HERMES): feasibility of a general practice training intervention to improve the response to male patients who have experienced or perpetrated domestic violence and abuse. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(3):281–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.O’Doherty L1, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healtcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3.
- 29.Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(16):iii–v, xi-xiii, 1-113, 37-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Thompson M, Basile KC, Hertz M, Sitterle D. Measuring intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: a compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2006.Google Scholar
- 38.Stevens L. Screening for sexual violence: gaps in research and recommendations for change 2007 1/10/18. Available from: https://vawnet.org/sites/default/files/materials/files/2016-09/AR_ScreeningforSV.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
- 39.Alvarez C, Fedock G, Grace K, Campbell J. Provider screening and counseling for intimate partner violence: a systematic review of practices and influencing factors. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016:1–17.Google Scholar
- 47.• Parcesepe A, Martin SL, Pollock M, Garcia-Moreno C. The effectiveness of mental health interventions for adult female survivors of sexual assault: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;25:15–25 This systematic review provides a useful summary and critique of the current evidence around responding to adult female survivors of SV. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Regehr C, Alaggia R, Dennis J, Pitts A, Saini M. Interventions to reduce distress in adult victims of sexual violence and rape: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2013;2013(3).Google Scholar
- 49.Warshaw C, Sullivan CM, Rivera EA. A systematic review of trauma-focused interventions for domestic violence survivors. Chicago: National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma & Mental Health. 2013. Available from: http://www.nationalcenterdvtraumamh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/NCDVTMH_EBPLitReview2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
- 50.Quadara A. Implementing trauma-informed systems of care in health settings: the WITH study. State of knowledge paper. Alexandria: Australia’s National Research Organization for Women’s Safety; 2015.Google Scholar
- 52.Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016;16:16.Google Scholar
- 53.Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. ‘A huge, hidden problem’: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion. Qual Health Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318819839.
- 56.Hegarty K, Tarzia L, Murray E, Valpied J, Humphreys C, Taft A, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE). BMC Public Health. 2015;15(736).Google Scholar
- 57.Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Scott-Storey K, Wuest J, Case J, Currie L, et al. A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN Plan 4 Safety randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(273):1–12.Google Scholar
- 58.Koziol-McLain J, Vandal A, Wilson D, Nada-Raja S, Dobbs T, McLean C, et al. Efficacy of a web-based safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(1).Google Scholar
- 61.Zlotnick C, Tzilos Wernette G, Raker CA. A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based brief intervention for victimized perinatal women seeking mental health treatment. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0895-1.
- 62.Tarzia L, Iyer D, Thrower E, Hegarty K. ‘Technology doesn’t judge you’: Young Australian women’s views on using the internet and smartphones to address intimate partner violence. J Technol Hum Serv. 2017;35(3):199–218.Google Scholar
- 64.Rivas C, Ramsay J, Sadowski L, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S, et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3(12):CD005043.Google Scholar
- 65.• Gupta J, Falb K, Ponta O, Xuan Z, Campos P, Gomez A, et al. A nurse-delivered, clinic-based intervention to address intimate partner violence among low-income women in Mexico City: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2017;15(128) This study represents a robust trial of an advocacy intervention with a large sample size. It contradicts previous systematic review evidence (mostly small, low-quality trials) that suggests that advocacy interventions are effective for women experiencing DV. Google Scholar
- 69.Rhodes K, Rodgers M, Sommers M, Hanlon A, Chittams J, Doyle A, et al., editors. Evaluating a motivational intervention for intimate partner violence & heavy drinking in emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. 38th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism; 2015; San Antonio Texas.Google Scholar
- 76.Bacchus L, Bewley S, Fernandez C, et al. Health sector responses to domestic violence in Europe: a comparison of promising intervention models in maternity and primary care settings. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2012.Google Scholar
- 77.Tarzia L, May C, Hegarty K. Assessing the feasibility of a web-based domestic violence intervention using chronic disease frameworks: reducing the burden of ‘treatment’ and promoting capacity for action in women abused by a partner. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16(73):1–9.Google Scholar
- 80.Carlsen A, Salam M, Miller C, Lu D, Ngu A, Patel J, et al. #MeToo brought down 201 powerful men. Nearly half of their replacements are women. New York Times. 2018. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/23/us/metoo-replacements.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
- 81.Mervosh S. Domestic violence awareness hasn’t caught up with #MeToo. Here’s why. New York Times. 2018. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/16/us/domestic-violence-hotline-me-too.html. Accessed 26 Oct 2018.