Toward an Emerging Role for Motivational Interviewing in Primary Care
- 613 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Implementing Motivational Interviewing (MI) in primary care settings has been problematic due in part to persistent gaps in knowledge. Examples include poor understanding of how to effectively train persons to conduct MI, or of which aspects of MI-related communication are associated with better outcomes for patients. This review describes how recent research findings addressing the knowledge gaps support a growing role for MI in primary care.
Two trials of MI training combined classroom time with ongoing coaching and feedback, resulting in enhanced MI ability relative to a control arm where PCPs received minimal or no MI training. A third MI training trial excluded coaching and feedback, failing to increase use of MI. Adding to a growing list of behavioral health-related problems for which MI training has shown some effectiveness, a trial of training PCPs to use MI with depressed patients was associated with significantly improved depressive symptoms. Moreover, aspects of the PCPs’ MI-related language and patients’ arguments for positive behavior changes, “change talk,” appeared to explain the positive effects of MI training on depression outcome.
MI-training approaches have improved such that PCPs and possibly other clinic staff may want to consider MI training as a way to more effectively support their patients as they address behavioral health-related problems (e.g., tobacco use). MI training should focus on eliciting “change talk” from patients. Researchers and funding agencies might collaborate to continue closing knowledge gaps in the MI literature.
KeywordsMotivational Interviewing Primary care MI training
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Robert Keeley, Matthew Engel, Alex Reed, David Brody, and Brian L. Burke each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 4.Organization WH. The world health report 2006: working together for health: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
- 12.White WL, Miller WR. The use of confrontation in addiction treatment: history, science and time for change. Counselor. 2007;8(4):12–30.Google Scholar
- 16.Miller RM, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping people change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 17.Moyers TB, Houck J, Glynn LH, Hallgren KA, Manuel JK. A randomized controlled trial to influence client language in substance use disorder treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;172:43–50.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.036. Epub 7 Jan 12.
- 22.Magill M, Apodaca TR, Borsari B, Gaume J, Hoadley A, Gordon REF, et al. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: technical, relational, and conditional process models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(2):140–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000250. Epub 2017 Dec 21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ball GD, Mackenzie-Rife KA, Newton MS, Alloway CA, Slack JM, Plotnikoff RC, et al. One-on-one lifestyle coaching for managing adolescent obesity: findings from a pilot, randomized controlled trial in a real-world, clinical setting. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16(6):345–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Barkin SL, Finch SA, Ip EH, Scheindlin B, Craig JA, Steffes J, et al. Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e15–25. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-611. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz CA, von Sternberg K, Velasquez MM, Smith PB, et al. Efficacy of a motivational behavioral intervention to promote chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in young women: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 46(2):152–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.012.
- 41.Hardcastle S, Taylor A, Bailey M, Castle R. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of a primary health care based counselling intervention on physical activity, diet and CHD risk factors. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(1):31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.014. Epub Nov 7.
- 44.• Menon U, Belue R, Wahab S, Rugen K, Kinney AY, Maramaldi P, et al. A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(3):294–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z. This may be the first trial of MI in primary care to assess and report MI training outcomes with a valid approach to measuring fidelity, thus taking a step toward addressing limited understanding of how well MI is conducted in trials. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 46.Obarzanek E, Kimm SY, Barton BA, Van Horn LL, Kwiterovich PO Jr, Simons-Morton DG, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of a cholesterol-lowering diet in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: seven-year results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):256–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Ogedegbe G, Chaplin W, Schoenthaler A, Statman D, Berger D, Richardson T, et al. A practice-based trial of motivational interviewing and adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21(10):1137–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2008.240. Epub Jul 24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 49.Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Christensen B. General practitioners trained in motivational interviewing can positively affect the attitude to behaviour change in people with type 2 diabetes. One year follow-up of an RCT, ADDITION Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(3):172–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430903072876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 50.Schaus JF, Sole ML, McCoy TP, Mullett N, O’Brien MC. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: a randomized controlled trial. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009;(16):131–41.Google Scholar
- 53.Van Voorhees BW, Fogel J, Pomper BE, Marko M, Reid N, Watson N, et al. Adolescent dose and ratings of an internet-based depression prevention program: a randomized trial of primary care physician brief advice versus a motivational interview. J Cogn Behav Psychother. 2009;9(1):1–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 54.Ogedegbe G, Schoenthaler A, Richardson T, Lewis L, Belue R, Espinosa E, et al. An RCT of the effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):169–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Madson MB, Loignon AC, Lane C. Training in motivational interviewing: a systematic review. J Subst Abus Treat. 2008;Google Scholar
- 59.Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6126.96.36.1993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 63.Kraemer HCA. Mediator effect size in randomized clinical trials. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014;18(10)Google Scholar
- 64.•• Fu SS, Roth C, Battaglia CT, Nelson DB, Farmer MM, Do T, et al. Training primary care clinicians in motivational interviewing: a comparison of two models. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(1):61–8. This MI training trial appears to be the first to include primary care staff and demonstrate that classroom training with ongoing coaching and booster sessions was associated with superior provision of MI over 12 weeks relative to a classroom-only training. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.•• Jansink R, Braspenning J, Laurant M, Keizer E, Elwyn G, Weijden T, et al. Minimal improvement of nurses’ motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-44. This trial of MI training made substantive contributions to addressing two knowledge gaps in the literature by contributing toward understanding what approaches are impactful or not for MI training, and how to measure fidelity. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 66.•• Jansink R, Braspenning J, Keizer E, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R. No identifiable Hb1Ac or lifestyle change after a comprehensive diabetes programme including motivational interviewing: a cluster randomised trial. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013;31(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.797178. This clinical trial of MI training for improving patients’ sugar control and lifestyle made substantive contributions to addressing the third knowledge gap, puzzling heterogeneity in outcomes, by demonstrating how fidelity information provided context for a negative trial. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 67.•• Keeley RD, Burke BL, Brody D, Dimidjian S, Engel M, Emsermann C, et al. Training to use motivational interviewing techniques for depression: a cluster randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(5):621–36. This trial of MI training appeared to result in improvements in some but not all MI techniques that persisted over 2 years, contributing to addressing the first two knowledge gaps pertaining to how to train persons to conduct MI and how to measure fidelity. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 68.•• Keeley RD, Brody DS, Engel M, Burke BL, Nordstrom K, Moralez E, et al. Motivational interviewing improves depression outcome in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84(11):993–1007. Epub 2016 Sep 5. This trial begins to address the fourth knowledge gap, which is poor understanding of MI's mechanisms. Google Scholar
- 71.Cox ME, Yancy WS Jr, Coffman CJ, Ostbye T, Tulsky JA, Alexander SC, et al. Effects of counseling techniques on patients’ weight-related attitudes and behaviors in a primary care clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):363–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar