Personality Disorders in DSM-5: Emerging Research on the Alternative Model

  • Leslie C. Morey
  • Kathryn T. Benson
  • Alexander J. Busch
  • Andrew E. Skodol
Personality Disorders (C Schmahl, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Personality Disorders

Abstract

The current categorical classification of personality disorders, originally introduced in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III), has been found to suffer from numerous shortcomings that hamper its usefulness for research and for clinical application. The Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group for DSM-5 was charged with developing an alternative model that would address many of these concerns. The developed model involved a hybrid dimensional/categorical model that represented personality disorders as combinations of core impairments in personality functioning with specific configurations of problematic personality traits. The Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association did not accept the Task Force recommendation to implement this novel approach, and thus this alternative model was included in Sect. III of the DSM-5 among concepts requiring additional study. This review provides an overview of the emerging research on this alternative model, addressing each of the primary components of the model.

Keywords

Personality disorders DSM-5 Alternative model 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC. 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blashfield RK, Intoccia V. Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;157(3):472–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frances A. The DSM-III personality disorders section: a commentary. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:1050–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frances A. Categorical and dimensional systems of personality diagnosis: a comparison. Compr Psychiatry. 1982;23:516–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heumann KA, Morey LC. Reliability of categorical and dimensional judgments of personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:498–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark LA, Livesley WJ, Morey LC. Special feature: personality disorder assessment: the challenge of construct validity. J Pers Disord. 1997;11(3):205–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Ruan WJ. Co-occurrence of DSM-IV personality disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Compr Psychiatry. 2005;46:1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zimmerman M, Rothschild L. The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1911–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johansen M, Karterud S, Pedersen G, Gude T, Falkum E. An investigation of the prototype validity of the borderline DSM-IV construct. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;109(4):289–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Pfohl B, Widiger TA, Livesley WJ, Siever LJ. The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personaltity structure. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51(12):936–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper LD, Balsis S. When less is more: how fewer diagnostic criteria can indicate greater severity. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(3):285–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmerman M. Diagnosing personality disorders a review of issues and research methods. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51(3):225–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chmielewski M, Watson D. What is being assessed and why it matters: the impact of transient error on trait research. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(1):186–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shea MT, Stout R, Gunderson J, Morey LC, Grilo CM, McGlashan T, et al. Short-term diagnostic stability of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(12):2036–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts BW, DelVecchio WF. The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psycholo Bull. 2000;126(1):3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gunderson JG, Stout RL, McGlashan TH, et al. Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: psychopathology and functioning from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:827–37.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, McGlashan TH, Morey LC, Sanislow CA, et al. The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): overview and implications. J Pers Disord. 2005;19(5):487–504.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verheul R, Widiger TA. A meta-analysis of the prevalence and usage of the personality disorder not otherwise specified diagnosis. J Pers Disord. 2004;18:309–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson JG, First MB, Cohen P, Skodol AE, Kasen S, Brook JS. Adverse outcomes associated with personality disorder not otherwise specified in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(10):1926–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verheul R, Bartak A, Widiger T. Prevalence and construct validity of personality disorder not otherwise specified (PDNOS). J Pers Disord. 2007;21(4):359–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilberg T, Hummelen B, Pedersen G, Karterud S. A study of patients with personality disorder not otherwise specified. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(5):460–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morey LC, Zanarini MC. Borderline personality: traits and disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109(4):733–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morey LC, Hopwood CJ, Gunderson JG, Skodol AE, Shea MT, Yen S, et al. Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders. Psychol Med. 2007;37(7):983–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hopwood CJ, Zanarini MC. Borderline personality traits and disorder: predicting prospective patient functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(4):585–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.••
    Morey LC, Hopwood CJ, Markowitz JC, Gunderson JG, Grilo CM, McGlashan TH, et al. Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up. Psychological Med. 2012;42:1705–13. Demonstrates that pathological traits demonstrate far greater predictive validity than categorical PD diagnosis in 10 years of follow-up data.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kendler KS. An historical framework for psychiatric nosology. Psychol Med. 2009;39:1935–41.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eaton NR, Krueger RF, South SC, Simms LJ, Clark LA. Contrasting prototypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathology: evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes, are robust. Psychol Med. 2011;41:1151–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCrae RR, Terracciano A, Costa PT, Ozer DJ. Person-factors in the California Adult Q-Set: closing the door on personality trait types? Eur J Pers. 2006;20:29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Markon KE, Krueger RF, Watson D. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integra¬tive hierarchical approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88:139–57.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol. 1997;52(5):509–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCrae RR, Terracciano A. Personality profiles of cultures project. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(3):407–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DE. A research agenda for DSM-V. Am Psychiatric Associ. 2002.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rounsaville BJ, Alarcon RD, Andrews G, Jackson JS, Kendell RE, Kendler KS. Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. In: A Research Agenda for DSM-V. Am Psychiatric Associ. 2002;1–29.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Benjamin LS. Dimensional, categorical, or hybrid analyses of personality: a response to Widiger’s proposal. Psychol Inq. 1993;4(2):91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blashfield R. Variants of categorical and dimensional models. Psychol Inq. 1993;4(2):95–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bernstein DP, Iscan C, Maser J. Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. J Pers Disord. 2007;21(5):536–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Skodol AE, Clark LA, Bender DS, Krueger RF, Morey LC, Verhuel R, et al. Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: description and rationale. Pers Disord: Theory Res Treat. 2011;2(1):4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Skodol AE. Personality disorder classification: stuck in neutral, how to move forward? Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2014;16(10):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Widiger TA, Simonsen E, Sirovatka PJ, Regier DA. Advancing the research agenda for DSM-V: I. Dimensional models of personality disorder. 2006.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Krueger RF, Markon KE. Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:111–33.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morey LC. Personality pathology as pathological narcissism. In: Maj M, Akiskal HS, Mezzich JE, Okasha A, editors. World psychiatric association series: evidence and experience in psychiatry. New York: Wiley; 2005. p. 328–31.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hopwood CJ, Malone JC, Ansell EB, Sanislow CA, Grilo CM, Pinto A, et al. Personality assessment in DSM-5: empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. J Pers Disord. 2011;25:305–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tyrer P. The problem of severity in the classification of personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2005;19(3):309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bender DS, Morey LC, Skodol AE. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: a review of theory and methods. J Pers Assess. 2011;93(4):332–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Morey LC, Berghuis H, Bender DS, Verheul R, Krueger RF, Skodol AE. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. J Pers Assess. 2011;93(4):347–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC. 2013.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bender DS. An ecumenical approach to conceptualizing and studying the core of personality psychopathology: a commentary on Hopwood et al. J Pers Disord. 2013;27(3):311–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morey LC, Bender DS, Skodol AE. Validating the proposed diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, severity indicator for personality disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013;201(9):729–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.••
    Few LR, Miller JD, Rothbaum A, Meller S, Maples J, Terry DP, et al. Examination of the proposed DSM-5 dimensional diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(4):1057–69. Describes the interrater reliability of alternative model components and their relationship to DSM-IV PD concepts.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hentschel AG, Pukrop R. The essential features of personality disorder in DSM-5: the relationship between criteria A and B. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014;202(5):412–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Costa PT, McCrae RR. Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality. J Pers Disord. 1990;4(4):362–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zimmermann J, Benecke C, Bender DS, Skodol AE, Schauenburg H, Cierpka M, et al. Assessing DSM-5 level of personality functioning from videotaped clinical interviews: a pilot study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students. J Pers Assess. 2013;96(4):397–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Krueger RF, Derringer J, Marko KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1879–90.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krueger RF, Markon KE. The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:477–501. Reviews the development and recent research on the trait component of the alternative model.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Samuel DB, Widiger TA. A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:1326–42.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Widiger TA, Costa PT. Personality and personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):78–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Widiger TA, Trull TJ. Plate techtonics in the classification of personality disorder. Am Psychol. 2007;62:71–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychol Assess: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;1:305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Widiger TA, Simonsen E. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. J Pers Disord. 2005;19:110–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jopp AM, South SC. Investigating the personality inventory for DSM-5 using self and spouse reports. J Pers Disord. 2014. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    De Fruyt F, De Clercq B, De Bolle M, Wille B, Markon K, Krueger RF. General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assess. 2013. doi:10.1177/1073191113475808.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fossati A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Borroni S, Maffei C. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assess. 2013;20(6):689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wright AGC, Thomas KM, Hopwood CJ, Markon KE, Pincus AL, Krueger RF. The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121:951–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Morey LC, Krueger RF, Skodol AE. The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122:836–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Bagby RM, Quilty LC, Veltri CO, Markon KE, et al. On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assess. 2013;20(3):286–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hopwood CJ, Thomas KM, Markon KE, Wright AGC, Krueger RF. DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121(2):424–32.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Samuel DB, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF, Thomas KM, Ruggero CJ. Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assess. 2013;20(3):353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Wygant DB, Salekin RT, Krueger RF. Examining the associations between DSM-5 Section III antisocial personality disorder traits and psychopathy in community and university samples. J Pers Disord. 2014;28(5):675–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wright AGC, Pincus AL, Thomas KM, Hopwood CJ, Markon KE, Krueger RF. Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Assess. 2013;20(3):339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Quilty LC, Ayearst L, Chmielewski M, Pollock BG, Bagby RM. The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assess. 2013;20(3):362–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Watson D, Stasik SM, Ro E, Clark LA. Integrating normal and pathological personality relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assess. 2013;20(3):312–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Thomas KM, Yalch MM, Krueger RF, Wright AGC, Markon KE, Hopwood CJ. The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assess. 2013;20(3):308–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gore WL, Widiger TA. The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(3):816–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sellbom M, Anderson JL, Bagby RM. Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assess. 2013;20:709–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hopwood CJ, Wright AG, Krueger RF, Schade N, Markon KE, Morey LC. DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assess. 2013;20:269–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Aluja A, Blach A. Predictive analysis of ZKA-PQ respect to the personality inventory for DSM-5 high order factors. Pers Individ Differ. 2014;60:66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Van den Broeck J, Bastiaansen L, Rossi G, Dierckx E, De Clercq B. Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: a DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2013;35(4):487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Krueger RF, Hopwood CJ, Wright AGC, Markon KE. DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clin Psychol. 2014;21(3):245–61.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Carlotta D, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Borroni S, Frera F, Somma A, et al. Adaptive and maladaptive personality traits in high-risk gamblers. J Pers Disord. 2014;28:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Clarkin JF, Huprich SK. Do DSM-5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? J Pers Disord. 2011;25:192–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zimmerman M. Is there adequate empirical justification for radically revising the personality disorders section for DSM-5? Pers Disord:Theory Res Treat. 2012;3(4):444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Morey LC, Skodol AE, Oldham JM. Clinician judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;123:398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gunderson JG, Links PS, Reich JH. Competing models of personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 1991;5(1):60–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gunderson JG. Understanding the speed of change: rejoinder for “Seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5”. Pers Disord: Theory Res Treat. 2013;4(4):381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Skodol AE, Morey LC, Bender DS, Oldham JM. The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5. Pers Disord: Theory Res Treat. 2013;4(4):342–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Morey LC, Stagner BH. Narcissistic pathology as core personality dysfunction: comparing DSM-IV and the DSM-5 proposal for Narcissistic Personality Disorder. J Clin Psychol In Session. 2012;68:908–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.••
    Morey LC, Skodol AE, Morey LC, Skodol AE. Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. J Psychiatric Pract. 2013;19(3):179–93. Describes rationale and evidence for constructing DSM-5 alternative model criterion sets, documents reasonable correspondence with corresponding DSM-IV concepts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Morey LC. Personality disorders in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: convergence, coverage, and internal consistency. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(5):573–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D, Dalrymple K, Martinez J. Impact of deleting 5 DSM -IV personality disorders on prevalence, comorbidity, and the association between personality disorder pathology and psychosocial morbidity. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(2):202–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Krueger RF. Promoting the vanguard: Rejoinder for “personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era.” Pers Disord: Theory Res Treat. 2013;4(4):367Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shedler J, Beck A, Fonagy P, Gabbard GO, Gunderson J, Kernberg O, et al. Personality disorders in DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(9):1026–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, et al. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(7):757–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Levy KN, Clarkin JF, Yeomans FE, Scott LN, Wasserman RH, Kernberg OF. The mechanisms of change in the treatment of borderline personality disorder with transference focused psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(4):481–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Morey LC, Bender DS. Articulating a core dimension of personality pathology. In: The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Personality Disorders. Edited by Oldham JM, Skodol AE, Bender DS. American Psychiatric Publishing. Virginia; 2014 pp. 39–47Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sanislow CA, Pine DS, Quinn KJ, Kozak MJ, Garvey MA, Heinssen RK, et al. Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010;119(4):631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gunderson JG, Stout RL, McGlashan TH, et al. Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: psychopathology and functioning from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:827–37.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Reich DB, et al. Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: a 16-year prospective follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:476–83.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Vernon PA. Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. J Pers. 1996;64(3):577–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hopwood CJ, Morey LC, Donnellan MB, Samuel DB, Grilo CM, McGlashan TH, et al. Ten year rank order stability of personality traits and disorders in a clinical sample. J Personality. 2013;81(3):335–44.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Krueger RF, Eaton NR, Derringer J, et al. Personality in DSM-5: helping delineate personality disorder content and framing the meta-structure. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:325–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie C. Morey
    • 1
  • Kathryn T. Benson
    • 1
  • Alexander J. Busch
    • 1
  • Andrew E. Skodol
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.University of Arizona School of MedicineArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations