Attention Bias Modification for Anxiety and Phobias: Current Status and Future Directions
Attention bias modification (ABM) was introduced over a decade ago as a computerized method of manipulating attentional bias and has been followed by intense interest in applying ABM for clinical purposes. While meta-analyses support ABM as a method of modifying attentional biases and reducing anxiety symptoms, there have been notable discrepancies in findings published within the last several years. In this review, we comment on recent research that may help explain some of the inconsistencies across ABM studies. More relevant to the future of ABM research, we highlight areas in which continuing research is needed. We suggest that ABM appears to be a promising treatment for anxiety disorders, but relative to other interventions, ABM is in its infancy. Thus, research is needed in order to improve ABM as a clinical treatment and advance the psychological science of ABM.
KeywordsAttention bias modification Attentional bias Anxiety Mechanisms
This project was supported by grants R01 MH087623-04 and R34 MH073004-01 from the National Institutes of Health awarded to Dr. Amir.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Nader Amir has received grant R01 MH087623-04 from the National Institutes of Health and is the co-founder of a company that markets anxiety relief products.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 4.Kuckertz JM, Amir N. Cognitive biases in social anxiety disorder. In: Hofman SG, DiBartolo PM, eds. Social anxiety: clinical, developmental, and social perspectives. 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier; 2014.Google Scholar
- 5.Williams J, Watts F, MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1997.Google Scholar
- 7.••Mogoaşe C, David D, Koster EHW. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22081. This updated meta-analysis examined effect sizes for (1) change in attention bias and (2) change in symptoms separately for different clinical conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression, substance abuse). For anxiety studies of ABM, the authors reported an effect size of g = 0.33 for change in attentional bias and g = 0.26 for post-intervention symptoms. Change in attention bias was significantly related to change in symptoms when all studies were aggregated with a similar effect size for anxiety studies only; however, the relationship for anxiety studies did not reach significance.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.MacLeod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(1):107–23. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hertel PT, Mathews A. Cognitive bias modification: past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(6). doi: 10.1177/1745691611421205.
- 15.•Beard C, Sawyer AT, Hofmann SG. Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: a meta-analytic review. Behav Ther. 2012;43(4):724–40. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.01.002. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of ABM for (1) change in attentional bias and (2) effects on subjective experiences for studies which consisted of conditions that compared attend neutral versus attend threat, attend neutral versus attend appetitive, or attend neutral versus control condition. The authors found large effect sizes for changes in attentional bias as well as generally consistent support that ABM affects subjective experiences; however, these effects were moderated by types of condition included and training methodology. Their results suggested overall stronger effects for threat rather than appetitive studies.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Boettcher J, Berger T, Renneberg, B. Internet-based attention training for social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(5). doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9374-y.
- 23.Zvielli A, Bernstein A, Koster E. Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clin Sci Rev. 2014. doi: 10.1177/2167702614551572
- 24.••Price RB, Kuckertz JM, Siegle G, et al. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. Psychol Assess. In press. This study examined the test-retest reliability of the probe detection paradigm in two clinically anxious adult samples and one pediatric healthy control sample. The authors provide specific empirical recommendations aimed at maximizing the reliability of this measure in attentional bias and ABM research.Google Scholar
- 27.Schmukle SC. Unreliability of the dot probe task. Eur J Pers. 2005;19(7). doi: 10.1002/per.554.
- 28.Staugaard SR. Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces. Psychol Sci. 2009;51(3):339–50. PAUAD sorsta@psy. au. d.Google Scholar
- 29.Waechter S, Nelson AL, Wright C, Hyatt A, Oakman J. Measuring attentional bias to threat: reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices. Cognit Ther Res. 2014;38(3). doi: 10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2.
- 33.Matsumoto D, Ekman P. American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motiv Emot. 1989;13(2). doi: 10.1007/BF00992959.
- 37.•Kuckertz JM, Amir N, Boffa J, et al. The effectiveness of an attention bias modification program as an adjunctive treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.09.002. This study found that ABM resulted in significantly greater decreases than ACC when used as an adjunctive treatment for PTSD in a military inpatient care unit. The authors demonstrated that initial attentional bias moderated, and change in attentional bias plasticity mediated response to treatment.
- 40.Shechner T, Rimon-Chakir A, Britton JC, et al. Attention bias modification treatment augmenting effects on cognitive behavioral therapy in children with anxiety: randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.••Clarke PJF, Notebaert L, MacLeod C. Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-8. This commentary was written as a response to recent studies suggesting that ABM and ACC do not yield differential decreases in symptoms. The authors point out that the majority of “failed” ABM trials did not actually succeed in manipulating attentional bias—the supposed mechanism of action in ABM trials—and thus, researchers should not conclude that manipulation of attentional bias is not associated with symptom reduction.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.••Kuckertz JM, Gildebrant E, Liliequist B, et al. Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2014;53:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.12.003. The authors analyzed combined data from two randomized controlled trials of Internet-delivered treatments for social anxiety disorder that compared (1) ABM to ACC (data initially published by Carlbring et al. 2012) and (2) ABM with a fear activation component to CBT. The authors found that ABM with fear activation was equally as efficacious as CBT and more efficacious than ABM without fear activation. The authors also demonstrated that the initial level of attention bias moderated treatment effects, and change in bias mediated the differences in social anxiety reductions for the two ABM groups.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Guy W. Clinical global impressions. In: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976:217–22.Google Scholar
- 49.Selig JP, Preacher KJ. Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Res Hum Dev. 2009;6. doi: 10.1080/15427600902911247.
- 50.MacLeod C, Mathews A. Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol. 1988;40. doi: 10.1080/14640748808402292.