Adolescents and the Internet: What Mental Health Clinicians Need to Know
- 3.7k Downloads
The Internet’s permeation into daily life has profoundly changed the practice of psychiatry with adolescents, who mobilize online social media and related technologies in their efforts to develop identity and “hang out” with peers. Technology offers both challenges and opportunities to mental health professionals working with teens. Practitioners will need a new skill-set, including keeping abreast of technological developments; professionally incorporating technology into clinical assessment and practice; identifying the negative impacts of technology on teens’ physical and mental health and the particular vulnerabilities of at-risk patients in a digital world; and guiding patients and parents about interventions. Particular patient factors related to race/ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation, mental health and trauma history, family culture, parenting style, and personality traits will need to be considered. This article provides an overview of the literature on adolescents and the Internet focusing on recent research on Internet and digital technologies used for social communication among youth.
KeywordsAdolescence Internet Social media Cyberbullying Text messaging Mental health Trauma Social identity Problematic internet use Professionalism Child psychiatry Psychotherapy Formulation Parent guidance
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Malak Rafla is employed by Cambridge Health Alliance.
Nicholas J. Carson is employed by Cambridge Health Alliance and has received honoraria and paid travel accommodations from Four Winds Hospital (Grand Rounds). Dr. Carson is also a member, Media Committee, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Sandra M. DeJong is employed by Cambridge Health Alliance. Dr. DeJong also is a PRITE editorial board member and has received honoraria and paid travel and accommodations for talks and Grand Rounds at various medical schools and psychiatric societies. She has received royalties from Elsevier for her book Blogs and Tweets, Texting and Friending: Social Media and Online Professionalism in Health Care (2014). She is also a member of the AACAP Ethics Committee.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Pew Research Center. Internet use over time. 2014. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/teens/internet-use/. Accessed 1 May 2014.
- 2.Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF. Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010.Google Scholar
- 3.Madden M, Lenhart A, Cortesi S, Gasser U, Duggan M, Smith A et al. Teens, social media, and privacy. 2013.Google Scholar
- 4.Madden M. Teens haven’t abandoned Facebook (yet). Pew Internet Research Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/08/15/teens-havent-abandoned-facebook-yet/. Accessed 1 May 2014. 2013.
- 5.••Lenhart A, Madden M, Smith A, Purcell K, Zickuhr K, Rainie L. Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: how american teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship”. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2011. Another recent and detailed report describing how US teens behave in online spaces. Google Scholar
- 6.••Boyd D. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press; 2014. This book is a sociological overview of the impact of technology on teens’ lives. It includes clinical examples from Boyd’s decade of qualitative research at Microsoft, New York University, and Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society. She argues that technology is scapegoated and dystopias over-emphasized by adults. It provides an interesting socio-cultural backdrop for clinicians and parents. Google Scholar
- 7.Palfrey JG, Gasser U. Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books; 2013.Google Scholar
- 8.••Steiner-Adair C, Barker TH. The big disconnect: Protecting childhood and family relationships in the digital age. HarperCollins; 2013. An overview of the known and potential impacts of technology on the wellbeing, development and relationships of children and families written by a psychologist at Harvard for a lay audience. It is based on the author’s clinical experience and qualitative research and is useful for parent guidance. Google Scholar
- 9.Pew Research Project Internet Survey. Internet user demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/. Accessed 24 April 2014. 2014.
- 10.Pew Research Project Internet Survey. Cell phone and smartphone ownership demographics. http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/cell-phone-and-smartphone-ownership-demographics/. Accessed 24 April 2014. 2014.
- 19.Miniño AM. Mortality among teenagers aged 12–19 years: United States, 1999–2006. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010.Google Scholar
- 20.Westerlund M, Wasserman D. The role of the internet in suicide prevention. In: Wasserman D, Wasserman C, editors. Oxford textbook of suicidology and suicide prevention: A global perspective. UK: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 525–32.Google Scholar
- 22.Brooks M. Prosuicidal posts on Instagram ‘Alarming’. In: Medscape psychiatry and mental health. 2014. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/824518?src=wnl_edit_cfna. Accessed 8 May 2014.
- 25.Lewis SP, Mahdy JC, Michal NJ, Arbuthnott AE. Googling self-injury: the state of health information obtained through online searches for self-injury. JAMA pediatrics. 2014.Google Scholar
- 30.Hinduja S, Patchin JW. School climate 2.0: Preventing cyberbullying and sexting one classroom at a time. SAGE; 2012.Google Scholar
- 35.Bazelon E. How to stop the bullies. The Atlantic. 2013.Google Scholar
- 38.English B. Yik Yak app raises bullying concerns. Boston Globe. 2014.Google Scholar
- 41.•van Geel M, Vedder P, Tanilon J. Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(5):435–42. A methodologically rigorous review of one of the most clinically important associations of online aggression.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Lenhart A. Teens and sexting. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2009.Google Scholar
- 44.The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Sex and tech: results from a survey of teens and young adults. http://thenationalcampaign.org/resource/sex-and-tech. Accessed 10 May 2014. 2008.
- 45.•Weigle P, Reid D. Social Media Use in Adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry.2014. An up-to-date review on social media and their effects on adolescent mental health. Google Scholar
- 49.Kaye R. How a cell phone picture led to girl’s suicide. CNN Living. http://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/10/07/hope.witsells.story/. Accessed 6 May 2014. 2010.
- 53.Chakraborty K, Basu D, Vijaya Kumar K. Internet addiction: consensus, controversies, and the way ahead. East Asian Arch Psychiatr. 2010;20(3):123–32.Google Scholar
- 56.••Carli V, Durkee T, Wasserman D, Hadlaczky G, Despalins R, Kramarz E, et al. The association between pathological Internet use and comorbid psychopathology: a systematic review. Psychopathology. 2012;46(1):1–13. An up-to-date and detailed review on the association between Problematic Internet Use and psychiatric disorders.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.Aboujaoude E. Problematic Internet use: an overview. World Psychiatr. 2010;9(2):85–90.Google Scholar
- 62.••Szwedo DE, Mikami AY, Allen JP. Qualities of peer relations on social networking websites: predictions from negative mother–teen interactions. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21(3):595–607. An important study for its focus on SNS and traumatized youth and families followed longitudinally.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.Erikson EH. Identity: Youth and crisis, vol. 7. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1968.Google Scholar
- 65.••Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(2):121–7. A useful synthesis of research on SNS effects on adolescent identity, intimacy, and sexuality including risks and benefits.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Nauert R. Avatars reduce depression rates in young adults. PsychCentral. http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/02/12/avatars-reduce-depression-rates-in-young-adults/51509.html. Accessed 12 May 2014. 2013.
- 72.Van Ameringen M. Social Anxiety Disorder and Technology-Based Communication, Symposium SCR03: Using the web for education and clinical support American Psychiatric Association 167th Annual Meeting; New York, NY. 2014.Google Scholar
- 73.DeJong SM. Blogs and Tweets, Texting and Friending: Social Media and Online Professionalism in Health Care. Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 76.Federation of State Medical Boards Inc. Model guidelines for the appropriate use of the Internet in medical practice. http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/2002_grpol_use_of_internet.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2014. 2002.
- 77.Federation of State Medical Boards Inc. Model policy guidelines for the appropriate use of social media and social networking in medical practice. www.fsmb.org/pdf/pub-social-media-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2014. 2012.
- 78.Council on Communications. Children, adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics. 2013;132(5):958.Google Scholar
- 79.Recupero PR. The mental status examination in the age of the internet. J Am Acad Psychiatr Law Online. 2010;38(1):15–26.Google Scholar