Beyond Bricks and Mortar: Recent Research on Substance Use Disorder Recovery Management
- 631 Downloads
Scientific advances in the past 15 years have clearly highlighted the need for recovery management approaches to help individuals sustain recovery from chronic substance use disorders. This article reviews some of the recent findings related to recovery management: (1) continuing care, (2) recovery management checkups, (3) 12-step or mutual aid, and (4) technology-based interventions. The core assumption underlying these approaches is that earlier detection and re-intervention will improve long-term outcomes by minimizing the harmful consequences of the condition and maximizing or promoting opportunities for maintaining healthy levels of functioning in related life domains. Economic analysis is important because it can take a year or longer for such interventions to offset their costs. The article also examines the potential of smartphones and other recent technological developments to facilitate more cost-effective recovery management options.
KeywordsSubstance use disorders Continuing care Recovery management Self-help Technology Smartphone
This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant No. DA011323. The opinions are those of the author and do not reflect official positions of the government. The authors would like to thank Brittany Callahan for assistance preparing the manuscript. Comments and questions can be directed to Dr. Michael L. Dennis, Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Drive, Normal, IL, 61761; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel.: 309-451-7801.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Michael L. Dennis and Christy K Scott have received a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant no. DA011323).
Alexandre Laudet has received a consulting fee from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (via Chestnut Health Systems) (grants no. DA011323).
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 8.Lenaerts E. et al. Continuing care patients with alcohol use disorders: A systematic review, drug and alcohol dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, in press.Google Scholar
- 9.•Godley MD et al. A randomized trial of Assertive Continuing Care and Contingency Management for adolescents with substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol, in press. This is the most recent experimental study of post-residential adolescent treatment asservice continuing care and contingency management that showed that both can be used to increase abstinence during the next 12 months and increase the percent of youth in recovery after 12 months. Google Scholar
- 11.Scott CK, Dennis ML. Recovery management check-ups: An early reintervention model. 2003.Google Scholar
- 13.Scott CK, Dennis ML. Recovery management checkups with adult chronic substance users. In: Kelly J, White W, editors. Addiction recovery management: Theory, science and practice. New York: Springer Science; 2011. p. 87–102.Google Scholar
- 14.•Scott CK, Dennis ML. The first 90 days following release from jail: Findings from recovery management checkups for women offenders (RMCWO) experiment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;125(1):110–8. This experiment replicated the effects of RMC with a women offender coming out of a county jail and showed how the direct effects on increased treatment led to an indirect effect in terms of reduced HIV risk behaviors and illegal activity.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.•McCollister K et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) for adults with chronic substance use disorders: evidence from a 4-year randomized trial. Addiction. 2013;108:2166–74. This experiment demonstrated that RMC was more cost-effective than the control group in terms of reduced cost per days of abstinence and cost per reduced substancee problems; it also showed that the marginal costs of RMC were complete off-set by reductions in healthcare/service utilization and/or costs of crime crime to society.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Zhao S. Patterns and correlates of self-help group membership in the United States. Social Policy. 1997;27(3):27–46.Google Scholar
- 19.Lembke A, Humphreys K. What self-help organizations tell us about the syndrome model of addiction. In: Shaffer HJ, editor. A psychological view of addictions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation; 2012. p. 157–68.Google Scholar
- 20.Pickard JG, Laudet A, Grahovac ID. The philosophy and practice of Alcoholics Anonymous and related 12-step program. In: Vaughn MG, Perron BE, editors. Social work practice in the addictions. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 119–36.Google Scholar
- 21.Rosenblum A. et al. Mutual aid groups. In: Intervention for mental health-substance use. 2011. p. 207–224.Google Scholar
- 24.Laudet AB, Humphreys K. Promoting recovery in an evolving policy context: What do we know and what do we need to know about recovery support services? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013. This paper reviews the emerging focus on recovery from substance use disorder and recovery support services, as well as the need for more effectiveness studies of the later. Google Scholar
- 40.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-44, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12–4713. 2012, Office of Applied Studies: Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
- 44.•Marsch LA, Carroll KM, Kiluk BD. Technology-based interventions for the treatment and recovery management of substance use disorders: a JSAT special issue. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(1):1–4. This special issue highlights recent studies evaluating new interactive web and mobile technologies to improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prevention, treatment, and recovery support services.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Gustafson DH. Personal communication based on unpublished preliminary analysis. 2012.Google Scholar
- 51.Gustafson D.H. et al. Effects of a mHealth intervention for alcohol relapse prevention. 2012. Cited 2013; Available from: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2012/12/mhealth-intervention-alcohol-relapse-prevention/.
- 52.Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4(1–32).Google Scholar
- 54.Office of National Drug Control Policy, ed. National Drug Control Strategy. 2011, Office of National Drug Control Policy: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 56.Laudet A et al. Collegiate Recovery Communities Programs: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, In press.Google Scholar