Chronic Headache: a Review of Interventional Treatment Strategies in Headache Management
- 114 Downloads
Purpose of the Review
To provide an overview of current interventional pain management techniques for primary headaches with a focus on peripheral nerve stimulation and nerve blocks.
Despite a plethora of treatment modalities, some forms of headaches remain intractable to conservative therapies. Interventional pain modalities have found a niche in treating headaches. Individuals resistant to common regimens, intolerant to pharmaceutical agents, or those with co-morbid factors that cause interactions with their therapies are some instances where interventions could be considered in the therapeutic algorithm. In this review, we will discuss these techniques including peripheral nerve stimulation, third occipital nerve block (TON), lesser occipital nerve block (LON), greater occipital nerve block (GON), sphenopalatine block (SPG), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI).
Physicians have used several interventional techniques to treat primary headaches. While many can be treated pharmacologically, those who continue to suffer from refractory or severe headaches may see tremendous benefit from a range of more invasive treatments which focus on directly inhibiting the painful nerves. While there is a plethora of evidence suggesting these methods are effective and possibly durable interventions, there is still a need for large, prospective, randomized trials to clearly demonstrate their efficacy.
KeywordsCervicogenic headache Peripheral nerve stimulation Radiofrequency ablation Greater occipital nerve block Lesser occipital nerve block Sphenopalatine block
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Ruchir Gupta, Kyle Fisher, and Srinivas Pyati declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.•• Levin M. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, (ICHD III)–changes and challenges. Headache. 2013;53(8):1383–95. This artcle provides rationale behind ICHD classification, a guide to its use; and summary of improtant diagniostic features. Google Scholar
- 6.Franco AL, Gonçalves DA, Castanharo SM, Speciali JG, Bigal ME, Camparis CM. Migraine is the most prevalent primary headache in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2010;24(3).Google Scholar
- 9.Bogduk N, Windsor M, Inglis A. The innervation of the cervical intervertebral discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(1):2–8.Google Scholar
- 10.Wu B, Yang L, Peng B. Ingrowth of nociceptive receptors into diseased cervical intervertebral disc is associated with discogenic neck pain. Pain Med. 2019.Google Scholar
- 14.•• Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Saper J, Huh B, Slavin KV, Sharan A, et al. Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(16):1165–79. In a randomized study investigators demonstrate that there was no difference between active and control group as far as PNS is concerned but showed 30% reduction (as opposed to 50%) in pain, decrease in headache days and improvement in diasbility. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.•• Mekhail NA, Estemalik E, Azer G, Davis K, Tepper SJ. Safety and efficacy of occipital nerves stimulation for the treatment of chronic migraines: randomized, double-blind, controlled single-center experience. Pain Pract. 2017;17(5):669–77. This study showed 60% of patients received atleast 30 % reduction in pain at 52 weeks for chronic migraine, albeit in a smaller study of 20 patients. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.•• Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Reed KL, Deer TR, Slavin KV, Huh B, et al. Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(4):344–58. This is a long-term follow up study of Silberstein et al showing larger percentage patients received 30% pain relief but 70% of patients expericnced an adverse event during 12-month follow up. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.•• Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lanteri-Minet M, Láinez MJ, Gaul C, Goodman AM, et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(10):816–30. This study showed 67% reduction in pain (vs 7.4%) with full stimulation on demand with acceptable safety profile. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.• Grandhi RK, Kaye AD. Abd-Elsayed a. systematic review of radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency for management of cervicogenic headaches. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(3):18. This comprehensive review shows that both techniques provide limited benefit and identifies an urgent need for a high quality RCT. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.•• Cohen SP, Peterlin BL, Fulton L, Neely ET, Kurihara C, Gupta A, et al. Randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study comparing pulsed radiofrequency to steroid injections for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness. Pain. 2015;156(12):2585–94. This study demonstrates greater reduction in pain up to 6 months with PRF compared to steroid injections, but analgesia was not accompanied by improvement in other outcome measures. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Fadayomi O, Kendall MC, Nader A. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of C2 dorsal root ganglion as adjuvant treatment for chronic headache disorders: a case report. A A Pract. 2018:1.Google Scholar
- 42.• Nagar VR, Birthi P, Grider JS, Asopa A. Systematic review of radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency for management of cervicogenic headache. Pain Physician. 2015;18(2):109–30. Because of the lack of high quality studies (RCTs) this review showed limited evidence to show the benefit of RFA and PRF for cervicogenic headache. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Haspeslagh SR, Van Suijlekom HA, Lame IE, Kessels AG, van Kleef M, Weber WE. Randomised controlled trial of cervical radiofrequency lesions as a treatment for cervicogenic headache [ISRCTN07444684]. BMC Anesthesiol. 2006;6(1).Google Scholar
- 49.•• Wang E, Wang D. Treatment of cervicogenic headache with cervical epidural steroid injection. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(9):442. This article describes neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and classification of CGH and comprehensive review of the efficacy of cervical epidural steroid injections. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar