Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: a 10-Year Experience
- 32 Downloads
Purpose of Review
An increasing amount of literature supports a multimodal approach to analgesic administration in the management of postoperative pain. The purpose of this study and review was to further evaluate the differences in efficacy in controlling immediate postoperative pain among the various routes of analgesia administration.
This study consisted of an analysis of the various routes of analgesic administration (parental, neuraxial, and oral/rectal) in 107,671 consecutive surgical cases performed over a 10-year period at Yale New Haven Hospital. This study included variables of postoperative pain score at initial request for analgesic, pain score at discharge, nausea and vomiting in the post-anesthesia care unit, and gender. The most common route of administration of analgesia in our study was via the parenteral route (29,962), and the least common route was the neuraxial route (1319). There was a significant decrease in pain scores at the time of discharge in all three groups relative to the pain score at first request for analgesia.
Multimodal analgesia via various routes of administration targets numerous proponents of the nervous system with the intent to reduce the adverse side effects of the individual analgesics if given alone or as an additive to produce synergistic analgesia. Our study suggests that although all the routes investigated (parenteral, neuraxial (intrathecal/epidural), and per os or per rectum (PO/PR)) promote significant pain relief on discharge from the PACU, the group that received neuraxial analgesia reported the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.
KeywordsPostoperative pain Multimodal analgesia Route of administration
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Nalini Vadivelu, Alice M Kai, Feng Dai, and Susan Dabu-Bondoc declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 12.Urden LD, Stacy KM, Thelan LA, Lough ME. Thelan’s critical care nursing: diagnosis and management. Maryland Heights: Mosby Inc; 2006.Google Scholar
- 14.Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. The Cochrane Library. 2001.Google Scholar
- 19.Pöpping D, Zahn P, Van Aken H, Dasch B, Boche R, Pogatzki-Zahn E. Effectiveness and safety of postoperative pain management: a survey of 18 925 consecutive patients between 1998 and 2006 (2nd revision): a database analysis of prospectively raised data†. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(6):832–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Shibasaki S, Kawamura H, Homma S, Yosida T, Takahashi S, Takahashi M, et al. A comparison between fentanyl plus celecoxib therapy and epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2016 Oct;46(10):1209–16.Google Scholar
- 21.Werawatganon T, Charuluxanun S. Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004088.Google Scholar
- 25.Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Carli F. Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(5):850–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Williams J, Louw G, Towlerton G. Intrathecal pumps for giving opioids in chronic pain: a systematic review. 2000.Google Scholar
- 40.Ebrahimzadeh MH, Mousavi SK, Ashraf H, Abubakri R, Birjandinejad A. Transdermal fentanyl patches versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine analgesia for postoperative pain management. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 May;16(5):e11502.Google Scholar
- 45.Minkowitz HS, Rathmell JP, Vallow S, Gargiulo K, Damaraju C, Hewitt DJ. Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery. Pain Med. 2007;8(8):657–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Viscusi ER, Siccardi M, Damaraju CV, Hewitt DJ, Kershaw P. The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(5):1428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Mugabure BB. A clinical approach to neuraxial morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:612145.Google Scholar
- 61.• Elia N, Lysakowski C, Tramer MR. Does multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and patient-controlled analgesia morphine offer advantages over morphine alone? Meta-analyses of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(6):1296–304 Meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrating advantage of multimodal analgesia compared to morphine alone. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.McDaid C, Maund E, Rice S, Wright K, Jenkins B, Woolacott N. Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of morphine-related side effects after major surgery: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess (Winch, Eng). 2010;14(17):1–153 iii–iv.Google Scholar
- 64.Toms L, HJ MQ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD004602.Google Scholar