A Review of Current Treatment Options for Coccygodynia
- 97 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Coccygodynia is pain within the coccyx area. The diagnosis is made clinically with symptoms of pain in the coccyx region and worsening pain in sitting position. The initial treatment is conservative therapy. For patients who do not respond to conservative therapies, there are further interventions available. This includes local injection of local anesthetics and steroids, neurolysis of sacral nerve roots, caudal epidural block, pulse radiofrequency (PRF), intra-rectal massage and manipulation, ganglion impar block, levator ani massage and stretching, coccyx manipulation, and coccygectomy. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the efficacies of these interventions in the treatment of coccygodynia.
Literature search was performed with the keywords including coccygodynia, treatment, and coccygectomy, on PubMed and Google Scholar between August 2012 and August 2017. Thirteen studies with patients age 18 and over who underwent treatments for coccygodynia were selected for analysis. These treatments include conservative therapies (physical therapy and capsaicin patch), interventional techniques (local injections with steroids and local anesthetic, pulsed radiofrequency ablation of ganglion impar, extracorporeal shock wave therapy), and surgical techniques (complete and partial coccygectomies). The results from these studies demonstrated that most patients had significant pain relief with these techniques.
Our literature review demonstrated various interventions including coccygectomy can be effective in the treatment of coccygodynia refractory to conservative therapies. There is a growing body of clinical evidence to support that coccygectomy is an effective treatment for patients with debilitating pain who had failed interventional therapies. Further randomized control studies should be conducted to examine duration of pain relief after coccygectomy and associated surgical complications.
KeywordsCoccygodynia Coccyx pain Ganglion impar Coccygodynia treatment Coccygectomy Ganglion impar block
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Yasmin Elkhashab and Andrew Ng declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Zundert JV. In: Evidence-based interventional pain practice: according to clinical diagnoses. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 103–6.Google Scholar
- 16.Cha YD1, Yang CW, Han JU, Song JH, Na W, Oh S, et al. Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar block for treatment of chronic coccygodynia after spinal arachnoid cyst removal: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(39):e5010. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Gunduz OH, Sencan S, Kenis-Coskun O. Pain relief due to transsacrococcygeal ganglion impar block in chronic coccygodynia: a pilot study. Pain Med. 2015;16:1278–81. This study highlights efficacy of ganglion impar block and limitations of repeated blocks for coccygodynia CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Kleimeyer JP1, Wood KB, Lønne G, Herzog T, Ju K, Beyer L, et al. Surgery for refractory coccygodynia: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(16):1214–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002053. This retrospective cohort study demonstrates coccygectomy as a successful surgical option for patients who have failed conservative therapy including injections. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Dalbayrak S, Yaman O, Yilmaz T, Yilmaz M. Treatment principles for coccygodynia. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2014; https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.9505-13.0.